Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Nonprofit

MANADA CONSERVANCY

MANADA CONSERVANCY (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $704,798 to it, the largest being THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ($180,150). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$1.0M
Funders on record
15
Grants received
$705k
Net assets
$1.7M
10/15 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 17%
01What it does

What Manada Conservancy does

Mission

Manada Conservancy is a land trust- a local, non-profit organization- dedicated to preserving the natural, historic, agricultural and scenic resources of dauphin county through land conservation, environmental education and community engagement.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Land protection: Manada Conservancy has protected over 2,500 acres of land through conservation easement or fee-owned property.

    $412,211 spent
    68% of program spending
  2. Environmental education: the conservancy's education program provides five education programs annually, two in the spring, one youth focused program in late summer, and two in the fall. These programs are free and open to the public. Programs include topics such as native plant-focused talks, natural history, land preservation, conservation and wildlife.

    $13,444 spentof which $200 as grants$14,007 earned by the program
    2% of program spending
  3. Communications and development: produced and circulated brochures, newsletters and other materials to members of our community. Presented numerous talks to various community organizations. Worked with local youth organizations. Offered outdoor experiences that were free and open to the public.

    $91,591 spent$14,008 earned by the program
    15% of program spending
  4. Stewardship and habitat restoration: habitat restoration is addressed through a native plant initiative, working with landowners on streamside buffer restoration as well as forest management and habitat improvement.

    $92,667 spent
    15% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $609,913.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($207k) Expenses 100 ($150k) Net assets 100 ($329k)2018 Revenue 180 ($373k) Expenses 108 ($162k) Net assets 161 ($531k)2019 Revenue 199 ($412k) Expenses 280 ($421k) Net assets 160 ($527k)2020 Revenue 202 ($419k) Expenses 119 ($179k) Net assets 234 ($770k)2021 Revenue 245 ($507k) Expenses 199 ($299k) Net assets 307 ($1.0M)2022 Revenue 227 ($471k) Expenses 163 ($245k) Net assets 338 ($1.1M)2023 Revenue 211 ($438k) Expenses 236 ($355k) Net assets 379 ($1.2M)2024 Revenue 495 ($1.0M) Expenses 443 ($665k) Net assets 515 ($1.7M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (495)Expenses (443)Net assets (515)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $1.2M to $1.7M (+36%).

$329k
$531k
$527k
$770k
$1.0M
$1.1M
$1.2M
$1.7M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 6% · 2018 39% · 2019 31% · 2020 5% · 2021 16% · 2022 1% · 2023 9% · 2024 61%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

90% of MANADA CONSERVANCY’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,303 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$57k
’17
$211k
’18
−$10k
’19
$240k
’20
$208k
’21
$226k
’22
$83k
’23
$360k
’24
13
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1413121312121212
Joined·+1+3+1+1+4+2+0
No longer listed·2402420
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 6 funders, grant income rose $35k → $70k.

6 of 15 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 51% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of MANADA CONSERVANCY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MANADA CONSERVANCY has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 26% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

67% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MANADA CONSERVANCY.

26%
largest funder
68%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 57% · 2018 46% · 2019 55% · 2020 60% · 2021 42% · 2022 82% · 2023 48% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

56% of MANADA CONSERVANCY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

51% of MANADA CONSERVANCY's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $344k that is directly attributable, 54% of it comes from funders outside Pennsylvania, across 3 states.

NY
PA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Pennsylvania out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $361k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

MANADA CONSERVANCY runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 2,187 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin35% · top quartile
Months of reserve12.9mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)26% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,187 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like MANADA CONSERVANCY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Pennsylvania

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

92% of spending goes to programs.

Program 92%Management 6%Fundraising 2%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

83%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

PA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MANADA CONSERVANCY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MANADA CONSERVANCY?
MANADA CONSERVANCY (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $704,798 to it, the largest being THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ($180,150). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does MANADA CONSERVANCY have?
IRS filings report 15 organizations giving $704,798 in grants to MANADA CONSERVANCY, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MANADA CONSERVANCY?
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY is the largest funder on record, with $180,150 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MANADA CONSERVANCY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Manada Conservancy →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 15 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing