Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kettle Run Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Environment$48kFood & Nutrition$10kArts & Culture$3kEducation$1kAnimals$900Community Improvement$600Other$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$162k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lancaster Conservancy$30,000
Lancaster Conservancy$4,000
Lititz Area Community Chest$3,000
Lancaster Farmland Trust$2,000
Hourglass$1,000
Manada Conservancy$700
Lititz Public Library$500
Lititz Historical Foundation$300
Venture Lilitz$200
Hawk Mountain Sanctuary Association$200
Individual grant recipient$200
Friends of Cornwall Iron Furnace$200
Trout Unlimited Donegal Charity$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Lancaster Conservancy: $30k → 9%Hawk Mountain Sanctuary Association: $200 → 11%Friends of Cornwall Iron Furnace: $200 → 11%Manada Conservancy: $700 → 12%Lancaster Conservancy: $4k → 9%Hawk Mountain Sanctuary Association: $200 → 11%Friends of Cornwall Iron Furnace: $200 → 11%Manada Conservancy: $500 → 12%Lancaster Conservancy: $4k → 9%Hawk Mountain Sanctuary Association: $200 → 11%Friends of Cornwall Iron Furnace: $200 → 11%Lancaster Conservancy: $2k → 9%Hawk Mountain Sanctuary Association: $100 → 11%Hourglass: $1k → 9%Lancaster Conservatory: $1k → 9%Hourglass: $1k → 9%Historic Preservation Trust: $500 → 9%Hourglass: $500 → 9%Hourglass: $500 → 9%Historic Preservation Trust: $200 → 9%Historic Preservation Trust: $100 → 9%Lancaster Historic Trust: $100 → 9%Lancaster Farmland Trust: $2k → 9%Lancaster Farmland Trust: $2k → 9%Lancaster Farmland Trust: $1k → 9%Lancaster Farmland Trust: $1k → 9%Lancaster Farmland Trust: $100 → 9%Lititz Area Community Chest: $3k → 9%Lititz Area Community Chest: $3k → 9%Lititz Area Community Chest: $2k → 9%Lititz Area Community Chest: $2k → 9%Lititz Public Library: $500 → 9%Lititz Historical Foundation: $300 → 9%Lititz Historical Foundation: $300 → 9%Lititz Historical Foundation: $200 → 9%Lititz Public Library: $200 → 9%Lititz Public Library: $200 → 9%Venture Lilitz: $200 → 9%Venture Lilitz: $200 → 9%Venture Lilitz: $200 → 9%Lititz Public Library: $100 → 9%Lititz Historical Foundation: $100 → 9%Lititz Historical Foundation: $100 → 9%Lititz Public Library: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$66k · 13 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$66k
$1k

Still filing today

69%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +4%
  • LP
    LITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1k · revenue +12%
  • DC
    DONEGAL CHAPTER TROUT UNLIMITED
    3× · 2022–2024 · $700 · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • LH
    Lancaster Historic Trust
    one grant, 2021 · $100

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lititz Run Watershed Alliance Cpld

Improve the quality of life within the Community by developing and implementing a Comprehensive Plan for the Lititz Run Watershed. This endeavor will focus the community on improving its water quality through a comprehensive long-term…

Environment
2
Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Inc

See schedule oper the bylaws of the delaware & lehigh national heritage corridor(which were updated by the merged board of the national canal musuem and the d&l), our mission is to work with government entities, non-profit organizations…

Arts & Culture
3
Millport Conservancy
4
Central Pennsylvania Conservancy Inc

The mission of Central Pennsylvania Conservancy (CPC) is to acquire, preserve, and protect local land and natural resources in a five-county, South-Central PA region. Our vision is to create a local network of permanently protected and…

Environment
5
Little River Wetlands Project Inc

To restore and protect wetlands in the historic watershed of the little river, a major tributary of the wabash river, and to provide educational opportunities that encourage good stewardship of wetlands and other natural ecosystems.

Environment
6
American Littoral Society

Promote the study and conservation of marine life and its habitat, defend the coast from harm, and empower others to do the same.

Environment
7
French and Pickering Creeks Conservation Trust Inc

To preserve, steward, and connect people to the land in northern chester county pennsylvania. see additional information on schedule o.french & pickering is recognized as a leader in regional land conservation, the organization is…

Environment
8
Lake Erie Islands Conservancy

Encourage conservation & protection of natural & agricultural lands in the lake erie islands for the benefit of this & future generations through purchase of land & sponsorship of programs & walks at these preserves.

Environment
9
Montgomery Creek Preserve
Philanthropy
10
Livingston Land Conservancy Inc

To protect the natural heritage and rural character of the greater Livingston County area by preserving quality natural areas and productive farmland. To promote an appreciation and understanding of the environment for the long term…

Environment
11
Lower Howards Creek Nature and Heritage Preserve Inc

The organization was formed to manage a 441 acre nature preserve. management includes controlling invasive species of plants, having archaeological surveys conducted and restoring historical sites.

Environment
12
Friends of Lackawanna

Friends of lackawanna is a pennsylvania non-profit corporation dedicated to supporting the health and welfare of the residents of northeastern pennsylvania and educating individuals regarding the health and safety of the enviroment.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lititz Public Library Inc and the most unlike its peers is Donegal Chapter Trout Unlimited. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY — $40,000 · EnvironmentLANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCYLANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST — $6,100 · EnvironmentLANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST+2 more — $1,900 · EnvironmentLITITZ AREA COMMUNITY CHEST — $9,500 · PhilanthropyLITITZ AREA COM…Hourglass — $3,000 · OtherHourglassLITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY INC — $1,100 · OtherLITITZ PUBLIC …Individual grant recipient — $1,000 · OtherIndividual gra…LITITZ HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · OtherLITITZ HISTORI…Historic Preservation Trust — $800 · OtherHistoric Prese…Individual grant recipient — $700 · OtherIndividual gra…Friends of Cornwall Iron Furnace — $600 · OtherFriends of Cor…+2 more — $300 · OtherHAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY ASSOCIATION — $700 · AnimalsVENTURE LITITZ INC — $600 · Arts & Culture
Environment$48,000Philanthropy$9,500Other$8,500Animals$700Arts & Culture$600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLITITZ AREA COMMUNITY CHEST — $9,500 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetLANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST — $6,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMANADA CONSERVANCY — $1,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY INC — $1,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLITITZ HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDONEGAL CHAPTER TROUT UNLIMITED — $700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY ASSOCIATION — $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVENTURE LITITZ INC — $600 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds LITITZ AREA COMMUNITY CHEST
  • Who funds LANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST
  • Who funds MANADA CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds LITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY INC
  • Who funds LITITZ HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DONEGAL CHAPTER TROUT UNLIMITED
  • Who funds HAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds VENTURE LITITZ INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lancaster County Community FoundationPA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kettle Run Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph