· Private foundation
Anne & Philip Glatfelter III Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $87k
- $10k–50k68 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k4 grants · $230k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST PAULS EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH | $65,000 |
| BARNES FOUNDATION | $65,000 |
| WITF INC | $50,000 |
| SPRING GROVE AREA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE | $40,000 |
| THE CROSSING INC | $40,000 |
| YORK COLLEGE OF PA | $40,000 |
| BALLETX | $35,000 |
| CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF YORK COUNTY INC | $35,000 |
| WOODMERE ART MUSEUM | $35,000 |
| NATIVITY SCHOOL OF HARRISBURG | $35,000 |
| YORK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $35,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HARRISBURG | $30,000 |
| PENNSYLVANIA BALLET ASSOCIATION | $25,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY HARRISBURG | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $736k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
120 repeat relationships — 83 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BBALLETX9× · 2017–2025 · $355k · revenue +158%
- POPENNON ORGANIZATION7× · 2018–2025 · $350k · revenue +89%
- TCTHE CROSSING INC9× · 2017–2025 · $325k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- FHFriendship Hose Co 1one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
- MSMAIN STREET YORK INCone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +21%
- GFGERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOLone grant, 2018 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
The mission of capital area school for the arts charter school is to provide students with a rich, rigorous, arts-infused high school program that enables them to succeed in college and careers.
Germantown academy inspires students to be independent in thought; confident in expression; compassionate in spirit; collaborative in action; and honorable in deed. germantown academy is a private school educating students from pre-k…
To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.
All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.
The association for public art (apa, formerly the fairmount park art association) commissions, preserves, interprets and promotes public art in philadelphia. dedicated to creating a museum without walls that informs, engages and inspires…
Founded in 1827, the pennsylvania horticultural society (phs) uses horticulture to advance the health and well-being of the greater philadelphia region. (continued in sch o)phs's work focuses on four impact priorities: creating healthy…
Charter school providing students a content rich, adademically rigerous core knowledge education with a well-defined, sequential curriculum in a safe, orderly disiplined and caring environment.
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
We connect the people and places of philadelphia through art and partnership. the organization is a free-standing platform that endeavors to show forward-thinking, high-quality contemporary visual and performance art in the city. the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior Achievement of South Central Pa and the most unlike its peers is Young Thinkers of York Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 152 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BALLETX ↗
- Who funds PENNON ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds THE CROSSING INC ↗
- Who funds WOODMERE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF YORK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds YORK SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds THE NATIVITY SCHOOL OF HARRISBURG ↗
- Who funds YORK COUNTY HISTORY CENTER ↗
- Who funds YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds ARDEN THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH BALLET ↗
- Who funds THE PENNSYLVANIA BALLET ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HARRISBURG SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds NED SMITH CENTER FOR NATURE AND ART ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA BREAST CANCER COALITION ↗
- Who funds ADAMS COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HARRISBURGINC ↗
- Who funds Philabundance ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
- Who funds THE VISTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YORK COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds LEG UP FARM INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS SMILES INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH CENTRAL PA ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA ↗
- Who funds MIGHTY WRITERS ↗
- Who funds Abington Art Center ↗
- Who funds SUSAN P BYRNES HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation · United Way of the Capital Region · York County Community Foundation · The Arthur J and Lee R Glatfelter Foundation · Powder Mill Foundation · McCormick Family Fdn Agent 80397 · Airie Knipel Harry V and J William Warehime Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · John Crain Kunkel Foundation · Joseph T and Helen M Simpson Foundation · White Rose Leadership Institute
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Anne & Philip Glatfelter III Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.