Skip to content

Missouri · Nonprofit

JEFFERSON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION

JEFFERSON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION (Missouri) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $696,689 to it, the largest being MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK ($464,587). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$21M
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$697k
Net assets
$3.6M
4/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What Jefferson Franklin Community Action Corporation does

Mission

The mission of Jefferson Franklin Community Action Corporation is to serve individuals and families through partnerships, empowerment, and education in order to strengthen and improve the entire community.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Public housing authority-provides rental and homeownership assistance to approximately 1,000 families in jefferson and franklin counties in missouri through the mainstream, housing choice voucher and emergency housing voucher programs.

    $8,914,617 spent
    44% of program spending
  2. The head start/early head start programs program is funded to provide education services to approximately 487 income eligible expectant families, infants, toddlers and preschool children and their families. The program provides services in 27 classrooms at 13 locations and offers in home education services throughout jefferson and franklin counties. The program employs approximately 107 staff who hold a bachelor's or associate degree, family development credential, and/or child development associate (cda) credential. The program contracts with 24 school districts and 6 community childcare/school district partners to ensure positive child outcomes for school and life-long learning.

    $5,665,225 spent
    28% of program spending
  3. Weatherization is a decades old program that focuses federal, state, and local resources on upgrading low-income client homes with energy efficiency measures, at no cost to the client. A comprehensive energy audit is performed to create a computer model showing the most cost-effective items to install on the home. The energy savings for client overtime will at a minimum pay for the cost of the measures implemented on the home. Health, safety, and comfort are also increased for the occupant with the added benefit of lower medical costs over the long term. Weatherization allows participants to save money on their utility bills by placing more useable income in their pockets. Jfcac weatherized 47 homes during the year ended 9-30-2025.healthy homes and home repair opportunity (hero) are two of our hud funded programs which allow the agency to provide major home upgrades such as new roofs and substantial health, and safety upgrades as identified. Hero installs roofs, repairs structural issues, and replaces windows along with a litany of other items. In the 2023-2024 program year we upgraded 3 homes. Healthy homes provides for home safety upgrades at no cost or obligation to the client.…

    $1,909,614 spent
    9% of program spending
  4. O energy assistance (ea) provides low-income utility clients with a once-a-year energy assistance grant paid to the primary utility company in order to offset the high energy burden experienced by many low-income families. Ea provides winter and summer crisis funds for clients who find themselves in a state of or threat of disconnect. Ea also works in partnership with local utilities, churches, and other organizations to enhance ea effectiveness and help solve payment of larger utility bills. Ea helped approximately 4,566 families.

    $1,536,215 spent
    8% of program spending
  5. The community services department includes programs delivering valuable services coupled with case management activities for supporting individuals seeking assistance in stabilizing households and moving towards self-sufficiency. All community service's projects work strategically, driven by the assessed needs of the community and individuals living in jefferson and franklin counties. Programs include the community service block grant, insurance, education & coordination assistance, empowerment coaching & case management, crisis intervention programs, skill-up, ezmo transportation and poverty simulations.

    $921,128 spent
    5% of program spending
  6. O the jfcac behavioral health program delivers accessible and affordable mental health therapy services to low-income residents of franklin and jefferson counties in missouri. Services include individual and group therapy, comprehensive intake assessments, and referrals to additional community resources. The program is designed to reduce symptoms in depression, anxiety, and other mental health challenges, while supporting improved overall well-being. Funded through a combination of grants and community partnerships, the program advances jfcac's mission to empower individuals and families through supported services that foster resilience, stability and mental wellness. The wic program is designed to safeguard the health and nutritional wellbeing of low-income pregnant, postpartum, and breastfeeding women, as well as infants and children up to age 6 who are at nutritional risk. Jfcac's wic program has two locations in jefferson county, and 18,734 participants were served during the fiscal year.

    $813,595 spent
    4% of program spending
  7. Transportation

    $436,142 spent$329,114 earned by the program
    2% of program spending

The 7 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $20,196,536.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($14M) Expenses 100 ($13M) Net assets 100 ($1.7M)2018 Revenue 96 ($13M) Expenses 103 ($14M) Net assets 65 ($1.1M)2019 Revenue 108 ($15M) Expenses 109 ($15M) Net assets 89 ($1.5M)2020 Revenue 106 ($15M) Expenses 107 ($14M) Net assets 111 ($1.9M)2021 Revenue 133 ($18M) Expenses 133 ($18M) Net assets 136 ($2.3M)2022 Revenue 149 ($21M) Expenses 153 ($21M) Net assets 173 ($2.9M)2023 Revenue 156 ($22M) Expenses 154 ($21M) Net assets 220 ($3.7M)2024 Revenue 154 ($21M) Expenses 158 ($21M) Net assets 219 ($3.7M)2025 Revenue 155 ($21M) Expenses 159 ($21M) Net assets 214 ($3.6M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (155)Expenses (159)Net assets (214)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $6.5M to $11M (+65%).

$2.7M
$2.7M
$3.3M
$4.3M
$6.5M
$11M
$10M
$8.6M
$7.7M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 99% · 2021 99% · 2022 99% · 2023 96% · 2024 98% · 2025 98%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$363k
’17
−$594k
’18
$364k
’19
$273k
’20
$432k
’21
−$26k
’22
$887k
’23
−$49k
’24
$92k
’25
2.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Diana Hayes

Chief executive officer

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2017 and FY2018 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed172024242121201819
Joined·+9+7+6+3+1+0+12+5
No longer listed·636611144
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 3 funders, grant income rose $114k → $135k.

2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of JEFFERSON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

JEFFERSON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 67% of grant income and the top three 93%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

73% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund JEFFERSON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION.

67%
largest funder
93%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 56% · 2021 74% · 2022 100% · 2023 81% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of JEFFERSON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION's grant income comes from Missouri funders.

MO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
’22
’23
Missouri out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $26k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding JEFFERSON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $54.4M on record.

Federal$54.4M
grants $54.4Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$48.6M
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development$4.9M
  • Small Business Administration$1.0M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like JEFFERSON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Missouri

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

95% of spending goes to programs.

Program 95%Management 5%Fundraising 0%

Governance

13
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 7 related entities

  • Jfcac Aurora Estates Gp LLC · disregarded
  • Jfcac Riverbend III Gp LLC · disregarded
  • Be 2 Mm LLC · disregarded
  • Aurora Estates LP · partnership
  • Riverbend Estates III LP · partnership

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for JEFFERSON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds JEFFERSON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION?
JEFFERSON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION (Missouri) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $696,689 to it, the largest being MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK ($464,587). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does JEFFERSON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $696,689 in grants to JEFFERSON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of JEFFERSON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION?
MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK is the largest funder on record, with $464,587 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like JEFFERSON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Jefferson Franklin Community Action →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing