Loading…
Loading…
Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit
JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE (Washington, D.C.) is funded by 86 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $20,845,885 in grants to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($2,490,233). 47 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE is better cushioned than half of the 211 animals nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 211 animals nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2024 16%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
94% of JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (65% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$123k from 2 funders in 2025, up from $858k and 12 in 2017.
40 of 86 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 58% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 86 funders by total. Association, not causation.
JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 12% of grant income, and it takes 6 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 6 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 61% · 2018 36% · 2019 47% · 2020 45% · 2021 21% · 2022 19% · 2023 33% · 2024 22% · 2025 80% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
33% of JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 55% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE draws 98% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C. — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 25 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 86 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $3.4M on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
80% of spending goes to programs.
89%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 28 states
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 86funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing