Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Aaron and Patricia Blumberg Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$432k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Animals$828kEnvironment$583kInternational$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kCrime & Legal$31kHealth$23kScience & Tech$22kEducation$8k
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $230k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$50,000
GREENPEACE FUND INC$50,000
SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY$50,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC$30,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED$25,000
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC$25,000
THE DIAN FOSSEY GORILLA FUND INTERNATIONAL$25,000
THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA$25,000
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC$25,000
BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA$15,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC$10,000
ENDANGERED SPECIES INTERNATIONAL$10,000
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHI$10,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 81% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHI: $10k → 22%THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA: $25k → 10%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $10k → 10%MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $30k → 14%THE DIAN FOSSEY GORILLA FUND INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 13%BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA: $15k → 9%THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA: $25k → 10%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $10k → 10%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $25k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $30k → 14%THE DIAN FOSSEY GORILLA FUND INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 13%BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA: $15k → 9%THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA: $20k → 10%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $25k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $30k → 14%THE DIAN FOSSEY GORILLA FUND INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 13%BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA: $10k → 9%THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA: $10k → 10%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $15k → 14%THE DIAN FOSSEY GORILLA FUND INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 13%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $10k → 14%SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $50k → 6%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $10k → 14%SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $50k → 6%SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $40k → 6%SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $20k → 6%ENDANGERED SPECIES INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 10%SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $13k → 6%ENDANGERED SPECIES INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 10%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $10k → 6%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $10k → 6%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $40k → 14%SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $10k → 6%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $10k → 6%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%GREENPEACE FUND INC: $50k → 14%GREENPEACE FUND INC: $50k → 14%GREENPEACE FUND INC: $40k → 14%GREENPEACE FUND INC: $20k → 14%GREENPEACE FUND INC: $13k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 27 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
0

Total granted

$1.6M
$0

Still filing today

96%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentInternationalCrime & LegalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $213k · revenue +128%
  • GREENPEACE FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $213k · revenue +31%
  • AW
    AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $213k · revenue +54%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Rainforest Trust

    Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

    International
    2
    Conservation International Foundation

    Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

    Environment
    3
    Wildaid Inc

    Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

    Animals
    4
    Wildlife Conservation Society

    The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

    Animals
    5
    Friends of the Earth

    Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

    Environment
    6
    The Nature Conservancy

    The mission of the nature conservancy is to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends.

    7
    Wildlife Sos

    Protecting india's precious wildlife from poaching, habitat loss, and human exploitation since 1995.

    Animals
    8
    Oceana Inc

    To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

    Environment
    9
    American Humane Association

    Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

    Animals
    10
    National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

    To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

    Animals
    11
    Rainforest Foundation Inc

    The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

    Environment
    12
    Environmental Investigation Agency

    To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

    International

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildlife Conservation Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Earthjustice. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

    ← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Environmental Advocacy Orga…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Animal Rescue and AdoptionLand Conservation Organizat…
    the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
    Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

    Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

    Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

    THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
    THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%55%35–55yr16%20%55yr+

    The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

    Closures · last 5 years

    The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

    orgs you fund
    0.0%0/27
    the rest of the field
    13%
    240,396/1,819,538

    Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

    04the grantee network

    26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    26/26
    Grantees still filing
    19/26
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY — $212,500 · AnimalsSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETYAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC — $212,500 · AnimalsAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INCTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC — $107,500 · AnimalsTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INCCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $66,000 · AnimalsCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INCBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA — $51,000 · AnimalsBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USAJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION — $33,500 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF SOUTHERN OCEAN COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER — $28,000 · Animals+6 more — $119,000 · Animals+6 moreGREENPEACE FUND INC — $212,500 · EnvironmentGREENPEACE FUND INCWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $142,500 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INCOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $60,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCYEARTHJUSTICE — $17,500 · EnvironmentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $50,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SA…AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC — $50,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INT…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $50,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTR…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $22,000 · InternationalTHE UNION O…Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc — $105,000 · OtherDian Fossey…DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK — $33,000 · OtherDELAWARE RI…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION — $22,500 · OtherRONALD MCDO…PA ANIMAL PROTECTIVE SOCIETY & SPCA INC — $10,000 · OtherPA ANIMAL P…PHILADELPHIA BAR FOUNDATION — $31,000 · Crime & LegalOVERBROOK SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND — $8,000 · Education
    Animals$830,000Environment$432,500International$172,000Other$170,500Crime & Legal$31,000Education$8,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY — $212,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetGREENPEACE FUND INC — $212,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC — $212,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $142,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC — $107,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc — $105,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $66,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $60,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA — $51,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION — $33,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK — $33,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetPHILADELPHIA BAR FOUNDATION — $31,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF SOUTHERN OCEAN COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER — $28,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA — $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION — $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $22,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC — $21,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetENDANGERED SPECIES INTERNATIONAL — $20,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETIES INC — $19,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $17,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMarine Mammal Stranding Center — $10,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetOVERBROOK SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND — $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY
    • Who funds GREENPEACE FUND INC
    • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    • Who funds THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC
    • Who funds Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc
    • Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC
    • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY
    • Who funds BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA
    • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC
    • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    • Who funds JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION
    • Who funds DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK
    • Who funds PHILADELPHIA BAR FOUNDATION
    • Who funds FRIENDS OF SOUTHERN OCEAN COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER
    • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA
    • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION
    • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC
    • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC
    • Who funds ENDANGERED SPECIES INTERNATIONAL
    • Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC
    • Who funds ASSOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETIES INC
    • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE
    • Who funds Marine Mammal Stranding Center
    • Who funds OVERBROOK SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Chubb Charitable FoundationPA12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Aaron and Patricia Blumberg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
    • Marine Mammal Stranding Center10% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph