Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Montana · Public charity

Intertribal Agriculture Council

The INTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL was founded in 1987 to pursue and promote the conservation, development and use of our agricultural resources of american indian and alaska native tribes.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
9
Itemized grants FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$1.2M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$81,223
Largest grant, FY2024
$513,770
States reached, FY2024
9
Total assets, FY2024
$15M

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
OR
SD
CA
NM
AR
TN
DC
MS

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Arkansas Fayetteville$513,7701n/a
Uve$264,6521n/a
Rural Coalition$99,38511%
Alcorn State University$96,6111n/a
Annies Project-Education for Farm Women$81,223117%
Indian Nations Conservation Alliance$69,804113%
Akiptan Inc$60,00011%
United South and Eastern Tribesinc$44,01610%
Intertribal Timber Council$7,63011%

Compare Intertribal Agriculture Council with peer funders

About Intertribal Agriculture Council

How much does Intertribal Agriculture Council give?
Intertribal Agriculture Council reported 9 itemized grants totaling $1,237,091, out of $1,914,523 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Intertribal Agriculture Council fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (49%), Human Services (21%), Food & Nutrition (11%).
Who are Intertribal Agriculture Council's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2024: University of Arkansas Fayetteville ($514k), Uve ($265k), Rural Coalition ($99k).
Where is Intertribal Agriculture Council based?
Intertribal Agriculture Council is based in MT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Intertribal Agriculture Council’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home