· Public charity
Greater Hudson Heritage Network
To provide services and assistance to historical agencies and museums.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 24 grants below total $170,627 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $243,861 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $73,234 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MUSEUM OF CHINESE IN AMERICA | $9,150 |
| NEW CASTLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $9,129 |
| LEROY HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $8,500 |
| PLANTING FIELDS FOUNDATION | $8,150 |
| LINDENHURST HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $8,146 |
| HOWLAND STONE STORE MUSEUM (HSSM) | $8,142 |
| SOUTHOLD HISTORICAL SOCIETY DBA THE SOUTHOLD HISTORICAL MUSEUM | $8,010 |
| EDWARD HOPPER HOUSE MUSEUM & STUDY CENTER | $7,970 |
| CARAMOOR CENTER FOR MUSIC AND THE ARTS INC | $7,500 |
| HISPANIC SOCIETY OF AMERICA | $7,500 |
| YATES COUNTY HISTORY CENTER | $7,500 |
| THE FARMERS' MUSEUM | $7,500 |
| THOMAS COLE HISTORIC HOUSE | $7,500 |
| DERFNER JUDAICA MUSEUM THE ART COLLECTION AT HEBREW HOME AT RIVERDALE | $7,500 |
| NORTH SALEM HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $6,565 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
70 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 56 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HCHISTORIC CHERRY HILL4× · 2017–2023 · $28k · revenue +80%
- SHSOUTHOLD HISTORICAL SOCIETY4× · 2019–2024 · $27k · revenue +44%
NIAGARA UNIVERSITY5× · 2017–2023 · $25k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- OCOSWEGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $9k · revenue +255%
- DCDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INCone grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +13%
- RHRUSSIAN HISTORY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +524%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization was formed to safeguard and share existing and future collections related to the social, cultural, and economic history of the high peaks adirondack region in and around the township of newcomb in essex county, new york.
Housing and exhibition of long island new york north shore historical significance
Museum provides general public with displays and information about the history of Fulton County New York.
To encourage preservation, education , research, and interest in the history of Albion
Preservation & maintenance collection
The mission of the Sharon Historical Society is to make all people aware of our history by linking the past with the present in order to inform them of our future. The Sharon Historical Society exists to inspire people's understanding that…
The Historical Society of Rockland County is a museum and educational organization dedicated to engaging diverse audiences in a dynamic dialogue about the rich historical heritage of the county.
Operation of roseau county museum along with acquisition, maintenance, preservation, and display of other items of historic interest to the county of roseau
The purpose of the montauk historical society is to collect, restore, preserve and display historically significant buildings, objects and writings and to preserve and share the history and cultures of montauk and the east end for this and…
Museum for the acquisition, conservation and exhibition of historical artifacts of st. lawrence county, new york.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rensselaer County Historical Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Percy Grainger Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
151 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 151 of the 182 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HISTORIC CHERRY HILL ↗
- Who funds SOUTHOLD HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NIAGARA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE LONG ISLAND MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART HISTORY & CARRIAGES ↗
- Who funds Yates County Genealogical and Historical Society ↗
- Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE HYDE COLLECTION TRUST ↗
- Who funds FENIMORE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds HECKSCHER MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Old Westbury Gardens Inc ↗
- Who funds HUDSON RIVER MUSEUM OF WESTCHESTER ↗
- Who funds New York Historical Society ↗
- Who funds EVERSON MUSEUM OF ART OF SYRACUSE AND ONONDAGA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds OLD MERCHANTS HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF CHINESE IN AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE NEW CASTLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds King Manor Assoc of Long Island Inc ↗
- Who funds THOMAS COLE HISTORIC HOUSE ↗
- Who funds HOWLAND STONE STORE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds BOWNE HOUSE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds EDWARD HOPPER HOUSE MUSEUM AND STUDY CEN TER ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC SOCIETY OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WOODSTOCK ↗
- Who funds SEYMOUR PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT ↗
- Who funds LOUIS ARMSTRONG HOUSE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds NIAGARA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CAYUGA MUSEUM OF HISTORY & ART INC ↗
- Who funds BARTOW PELL LANDMARK FUND ↗
- Who funds MADOO CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER MUSEUM & SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FASNY Museum of Firefighting ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF LONG ISLAND ANTIQUITIES ↗
- Who funds The Hebrew Home for Aged at Riverdale ↗
- Who funds THE FORT TICONDEROGA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DYCKMAN FARMHOUSE MUSEUM ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds RENEE & CHAIM GROSS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The William G Pomeroy Foundation · New York Council for the Humanities · Preservation League of New York State · Robert David Lion Gardiner Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · The Gladys Krieble Delmas Foundation · Historic House Trust of New York City Inc · The Tianaderrah Foundation (NY)
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greater Hudson Heritage Network funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Greater Hudson Heritage Network?
Find your warmest path to Greater Hudson Heritage Network through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.