Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Global Partners For Development

Global Partners For Development (California) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,361,153 to it, the largest being ROCK PAPER SCISSORS FOUNDATION INC ($540,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$648k
Funders on record
25
Grants received
$2.4M
Net assets
$316k
12/25 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 54%
01What it does

What Global Partners For Development does

Mission

GPFDs mission is to advance community-led initiatives that improve education and public health in East Africa. We envision a world in which every East African community has the capacity to implement dynamic, sustainable solutions to the challenges they face.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Community Driven Education (CDE) - Education is vital in the fight against poverty. In collaboration with local leaders who identify the schools with the highestneed, and the projects within the schools. In Kenya, over seven local schools have benefitted from constructed classrooms, latrines(toilets}, and in a school forstudents with physical challenges paved walkways to facilitate wheelchair access. In Tanzania,GPFD partnered with Genesis Community Fdn to advance education togirls and women in the community by expanding transportation services to and from school. In Uganda, GPFD partnered with Madaraja Foundation to support girlsand women to access essentail sexual reproductive health information and services.

    $299,181 spentof which $299,152 as grants
    53% of program spending
  2. Grassroots Community Led Development that is in support of grassroots organizations in East Africa. These organizations led by the local communities understandthe strengths and needs of the people they serve. In Burundi, GPFD supported the Menya Accelerator, a non-profit education-centered initiative whose goal is toprovide high-quality education to youth enrolled in formal education institutions. In Tanzania, GPFD collaborated with the community in Arkaria and organized alarge-scale tree planting campaign to combat the effects of climate change on the local environment. In Kenya, the Homa Bay Blue Print project is in response tothe pollution at Lake Victoria. The lake is a resource to the community and home to a varietal of fauna and flora. Using technology GPFD in partnership with theKenyan Government & others are turning waste into clean energy, water and fertilizer

    $242,337 spentof which $71,258 as grants
    43% of program spending
  3. Water Projects - In a unique partnership between Sonoma County wine industry and the East African communities, the Vineyards to Villages initiative funds cleanwater infrastructure, sanitation facilities and hygiene education,address the environmental, economic, and social justice challenges impacting their communities.In Kenya, GPFD financially supported the Turkana Women's Group in a water project that improved water access for communities and livestock.

    $23,585 spentof which $23,060 as grants
    4% of program spending
  4. Water Projects - In a unique partnership between Sonoma County wine industry and the East African communities, the Vineyards to Villages initiative funds cleanwater infrastructure, sanitation facilities and hygiene education,address the environmental, economic, and social justice challenges impacting their communities.In Kenya, GPFD financially supported the Turkana Women's Group in a water project that improved water access for communities and livestock.

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $565,103.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($918k) Expenses 100 ($793k) Net assets 100 ($851k)2018 Revenue 123 ($1.1M) Expenses 160 ($1.3M) Net assets 84 ($712k)2019 Revenue 128 ($1.2M) Expenses 141 ($1.1M) Net assets 91 ($771k)2020 Revenue 110 ($1.0M) Expenses 140 ($1.1M) Net assets 78 ($666k)2021 Revenue 123 ($1.1M) Expenses 107 ($846k) Net assets 111 ($945k)2022 Revenue 109 ($997k) Expenses 126 ($998k) Net assets 110 ($932k)2023 Revenue 86 ($789k) Expenses 143 ($1.1M) Net assets 77 ($657k)2024 Revenue 72 ($658k) Expenses 102 ($805k) Net assets 61 ($520k)2025 Revenue 71 ($648k) Expenses 107 ($849k) Net assets 37 ($316k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (71)Expenses (107)Net assets (37)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $683k to $1.0M (+53%).

$873k
$747k
$826k
$683k
$1.0M
$983k
$746k
$568k
$355k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 4% · 2022 4%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

82% of Global Partners For Development’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,945 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$125k
’17
−$140k
’18
$59k
’19
−$105k
’20
$280k
’21
−$1k
’22
−$343k
’23
−$148k
’24
−$200k
’25
4.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed1112121414151588
Joined·+1+0+2+0+2+0+0+1
No longer listed·00001071
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 6 funders to 9 funders, grant income rose $56k → $427k.

8 of 25 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 51% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Global Partners For Development’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Global Partners For Development has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 23% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

54% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Global Partners For Development.

23%
largest funder
60%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 71% · 2018 71% · 2019 48% · 2020 39% · 2021 35% · 2022 28% · 2023 32% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

25% of Global Partners For Development's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 48% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

51% of Global Partners For Development's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $1.2M that is directly attributable, 65% of it comes from California funders.

WA
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
DE
NC
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.2M arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Global Partners For Development's revenue fell 29% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−31% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve4.4mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−4% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,468 international nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like Global Partners For Development

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

67% of spending goes to programs.

Program 67%Management 32%Fundraising 2%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Global Partners For Development: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Global Partners For Development?
Global Partners For Development (California) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,361,153 to it, the largest being ROCK PAPER SCISSORS FOUNDATION INC ($540,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Global Partners For Development have?
IRS filings report 25 organizations giving $2,361,153 in grants to Global Partners For Development, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Global Partners For Development?
ROCK PAPER SCISSORS FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $540,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Global Partners For Development find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Global Partners For Development →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 25 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing