Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Brethren Community Foundation Inc

FOCUS ON GIVING TO BENEFIT SENIOR & YOUTH IN TWO METHODS; INDIV GRANTS & PROGRAMMATIC GRANTS TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS & SCHOOLS WHO SERVICE TARGET AUDIENCES.

$617k
Granted FY2020
24
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$150k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Brethren Community Foundation Inc’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Orange County Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Brethren Community Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 14 organizations, $617k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

14
17
17
18
17
19
14
20
0
21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Philanthropy$18MEducation$944kYouth Development$594kHealth$540kInternational$396kHuman Services$192kEmployment$50kHousing & Shelter$25kOther$0
02FY2020 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k8 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $213k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $358k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$150,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PHILADELPHIA$147,500
GLOBAL PARTNERS FOR DEVELOPMENT$60,000
IMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW$25,000
WISEPLACE SHELTER FOR WOMEN$25,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FONTANA$25,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FULLERTON$22,500
KIDWORKS COMMUNITY DEVELEOPMENT CENTER$20,000
URBAN YOUTH WORKERS INSTITUTE$15,000
PRENTICE SCHOOL$15,000
OLIVE CREST$15,000
PRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC$10,000
FAME$10,000
HART COMMUNITY HOMES$10,000
MY DAY COUNTS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HART COMMUNITY HOMES: $10k → 10%HART COMMUNITY HOMES: $10k → 10%HART COMMUNITY HOMES: $10k → 10%HART COMMUNITY HOMES: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 30 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2020, 6 since wound down. Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
6

Total granted

$2.7M
$43k

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Youth DevelopmentEducationHealthInternationalReligionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $122k · revenue +53%
  • IY
    IMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $90k · revenue ×18
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FULLERTON INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $73k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • KC
    KIWANIS CLUB OF GREATER JAMUL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LA HARBOR
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • MU
    MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys and Girls Club of Tracy

The boys & girls club of tracy's mission is to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
2
The Boys & Girls Clubs Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those most in need of our services, to realize and develop their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens in a global society.

3
The Antelope Valley Boys and Girls Club

The Antelope Valley Boys and Girls Club mission is to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
4
Boys & Girls Club of San Fernando Valley

Boys and girls clubs provide a safe place for youth to develop character, leadership, education, career guidance, health, art, sports and fitness while becoming responsible and caring citizens.

5
Boys and Girls Club of Fremont County Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
6
Boys & Girls Clubs of Bandera County

Enable young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances to realize their full potential as productive, responsible & caring citizens.

Recreation & Sports
7
Boys & Girls Clubs of El Paso

To enable young people, especially those that need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible adults

8
Boys and Girls Club of Hollywood Inc

Boys and girls club of hollywood provides educational programs in diverse subjects that are focused on providing structured learning to the children of our community.

Youth Development
9
Youth Policy Institute Inc

Youth policy institute (ypi) transforms los angeles neighborhoods, reducing poverty by offering cradle to college & career services.

10
Boys & Girls Club of the Coastside

To enable all young people, especially those who need it the most to reach their full potential as productive and responsible citizens. the organization achieves its mission through educational programs, enrichment activities and organized…

Youth Development
11
Community Youth Center of San Francisco

Our mission is to encourage a diverse population of high-need young people to explore their full potential through academic, career, family, and community life. Every year, CYC impacts over 8,000 San Francisco youth and their families,…

12
Boys & Girls Clubs of Fresno Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens. This is accomplished through activities provided for the children to participate in.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest and the most unlike its peers is Whittier College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $17,993,179 · PhilanthropyORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $500,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PHILADELPHIA — $480,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL OC — $100,000 · OtherWISEPLACE SHELTER FOR WOMEN — $82,620 · OtherKIDWORKS COMMUNITY DEVELEOPMENT CENTER — $75,000 · Other+16 more — $346,925 · OtherGlobal Partners For Development — $395,900 · InternationalBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC — $122,000 · Youth DevelopmentIMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC — $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FULLERTON INC — $72,500 · Youth DevelopmentFREEDOM 4 U — $37,400 · Youth DevelopmentDIY GIRLS — $17,500 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentWhittier College — $175,300 · EducationThe Prentice School — $65,000 · EducationPRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC — $35,000 · EducationOLIVE CREST — $50,000 · HealthDIGNITY GROUP — $25,000 · HealthHISPANIC MINISTRY CENTER — $55,000 · ReligionHART COMMUNITY HOMES INC — $36,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$17,993,179Other$1,584,545International$395,900Youth Development$369,400Education$275,300Health$75,000Religion$55,000Human Services$36,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $17,993,179 over 1y, 16% of budgetGlobal Partners For Development — $395,900 over 3y, 15% of budgetWhittier College — $175,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC — $122,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetIMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC — $90,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FULLERTON INC — $72,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetThe Prentice School — $65,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHISPANIC MINISTRY CENTER — $55,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetOLIVE CREST — $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FONTANA — $50,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetORANGE COUNTY ADULT ACHIEVEMENT CENTER DBA MY DAY COUNTS — $50,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFREEDOM 4 U — $37,400 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetHART COMMUNITY HOMES INC — $36,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC — $35,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetDIGNITY GROUP — $25,000 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouth Bay Youth Clubs Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Global Partners For Development
  • Who funds Whittier College
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC
  • Who funds IMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FULLERTON INC
  • Who funds The Prentice School
  • Who funds HISPANIC MINISTRY CENTER
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FONTANA
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY ADULT ACHIEVEMENT CENTER DBA MY DAY COUNTS
  • Who funds FREEDOM 4 U
  • Who funds HART COMMUNITY HOMES INC
  • Who funds PRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC
  • Who funds DIGNITY GROUP
  • Who funds DIY GIRLS
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds South Bay Youth Clubs Inc
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA30.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Southern California Housing Services · Pacific Youth Foundation · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Brethren Community Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph