Skip to content

New York · Nonprofit

GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP

GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP (New York) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $763,347 to it, the largest being HOLLYWOOD FOREIGN PRESS ASSOCIATION ($200,000). 19 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$568k
Funders on record
25
Grants received
$763k
Net assets
$114k
19/25 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 37%
01What it does

What Gingold Theatrical Group does

Mission

To create theatre and theatre-related programs that promote the humanitarian ideals central to the work of activist playwright George Bernard Shaw, including universal human rights, the freedom of thought and speech, the equality of all living beings, and the responsibility of individuals to promote societal progress.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Gingold Theatrical Group (GTG), now in its 21st year, produces theatre and related programs that promote the humanitarian ideals of playwright George Bernard Shaw, including universal human rights, freedom of expression, equality, and individual responsibility in advancing societal progress. GTG believes in the power of inclusive, mission-driven storytelling to engage diverse audiences and foster civic dialogue.To date, GTG has produced 12 Off-Broadway productions, most recently Shaws PYGMALION, which was nominated at the 70th Drama Desk Awards. The production engaged over 4,000 patrons and employed more than 250 artists, designers, and technicians.In FY 202526, GTGs Speakers Corner new play development lab supported four new plays, employing 4 writers, 4 directors, 50 actors, 6 stage managers, and 4 assistants, with 270 attendees across workshop presentations.GTGs Project Shaw reading series presented four public readings, engaging 650 audience members and employing 65 actors, 8 stage managers, 4 directors, and 4 assistants. All readings and workshops are free and open to the public.GTG also maintained educational partnerships with 2 New York City high schools and 5 colleges,…

    $416,257 spent$84,605 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $416,257.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($236k) Expenses 100 ($194k) Net assets 100 ($338k)2018 Revenue 199 ($469k) Expenses 222 ($431k) Net assets 111 ($376k)2019 Revenue 185 ($436k) Expenses 243 ($471k) Net assets 104 ($350k)2020 Revenue 323 ($761k) Expenses 110 ($214k) Net assets 280 ($946k)2021 Revenue 160 ($377k) Expenses 276 ($537k) Net assets 238 ($806k)2022 Revenue 148 ($348k) Expenses 329 ($638k) Net assets 127 ($429k)2023 Revenue 147 ($347k) Expenses 319 ($620k) Net assets 54 ($184k)2024 Revenue 192 ($453k) Expenses 302 ($586k) Net assets 17 ($57k)2025 Revenue 241 ($568k) Expenses 264 ($513k) Net assets 34 ($114k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (241)Expenses (264)Net assets (34)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $357k to $998k (+180%).

$345k
$384k
$357k
$998k
$866k
$450k
$202k
$98k
$129k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 23% · 2018 9% · 2019 10% · 2020 6% · 2021 21% · 2022 25% · 2023 10% · 2024 19% · 2025 15%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

84% of GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,618 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$41k
’17
$38k
’18
−$36k
’19
$548k
’20
−$160k
’21
−$291k
’22
−$273k
’23
−$133k
’24
$55k
’25
0.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Pamela Singleton

Board Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed111098910111112
Joined·+0+0+0+1+1+1+0+1
No longer listed·11100000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 15 funders, grant income rose $28k → $129k.

3 of 25 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 3% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 26% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

31% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP.

26%
largest funder
51%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 43% · 2018 38% · 2019 33% · 2020 38% · 2021 65% · 2022 21% · 2023 31% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

54% of GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 76% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

51% of GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP's grant income comes from New York funders.

IL
NY
CA
DE
AZ
NC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $20k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 12,262 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin10% · above the median
Months of reserve0.9mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)12% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 12,262 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Government funding GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $15k on record.

Federal$15k
grants $15kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • National Endowment for the Arts$15k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 15%Fundraising 4%

Governance

12
board members
92%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

71%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NY

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP?
GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP (New York) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $763,347 to it, the largest being HOLLYWOOD FOREIGN PRESS ASSOCIATION ($200,000). 19 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP have?
IRS filings report 25 organizations giving $763,347 in grants to GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP, 19 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP?
HOLLYWOOD FOREIGN PRESS ASSOCIATION is the largest funder on record, with $200,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Gingold Theatrical Group →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 25 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing