Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

Committee for Children

Committee for Children (Washington) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,704,654 to it, the largest being GATES FOUNDATION ($1,098,581). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2026
$34M
Funders on record
15
Grants received
$1.7M
Net assets
$-1900544
5/15 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 2%
01What it does

What Committee for Children does

Mission

To foster the safety and well-being of children through social-emotional learning and development.

As stated on its FY2026 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Program Development: Designing and developing new programs, enhancing existing programs, and developing tools and resources to support implementation. We use research, prototyping, field testing, advisory groups, and continuous feedback to ensure program engagement, relevance, and high implementation fidelity. Program development, impact, and evaluation goal: Develop, continuously improve, and evaluate culturally responsive and affirming programs that extend social-emotional learning into multiple settings and increase program impact through research-informed strategies and ongoing assessment of effectiveness.(See Schedule O for more achievements.) - Redesigned the K8 training experience with role-specific content and educator and student stories. - Introduced new and revised K12 lessons reflecting a broader range of student experiences. - Used educator survey and platform data to improve training structure, navigation, completion tracking, and differentiated access. - Expanded middle school units, high school practice tools, and district-level dashboards. - Conducted four Second Step K8 studies, each with more than 4,000 students, showing statistically significant outcomes at…

    $8,473,689 spent
    43% of program spending
  2. Implementation and Support: Providing consultation, training, and implementation support to current and prospective clients focused on the successful reach and impact of CFC programs. Implementation and support goal: Provide high-quality, efficient, and accessible implementation support to help ensure the successful reach and impact of our programs.Improved implementation supports by adding the following new strategies and tools: - Added implementation videos, webinars, messaging, check-in schedules, and resources.(See Schedule O for more achievements.) - Developed new training workshops to strengthen program implementation. - Created new goal setting tools. - Integrated implementation tools into programs to support social-emotional learning across classrooms, staff meetings, and schoolwide initiatives. - Launched a more intuitive implementation guide and improved access to key implementation resources. - Launched a high school program implementation and training plan.

    $6,141,653 spent$416,578 earned by the program
    31% of program spending
  3. Community Education: Educating teachers, administrators, families, and the broader community about social-emotional skill development, bullying prevention, and personal safety for children through conferences, presentations, speeches, community awareness campaigns, legislative advocacy, media outreach, and printed and web-based materials. Community education goal: Increase community awareness of human skills development, child sexual abuse prevention, and bullying prevention through social media, publications, presentations, policy advocacy, and other outreach.(See Schedule O for more achievements.) - Expanded social media channels to increase awareness of human skills development, child sexual abuse prevention, and bullying prevention. - Added blog content to SecondStep.org to expand access to social-emotional learning resources that help educators strengthen children's skills. - Attended and presented at national and regional conferences, including ISTE and ASCA, two national organizations that support K12 education and collectively serve more than 50,000 members. - Hosted a national webinar with more than 1,000 registrants on "Empowering Student Mental Wellness: The Science of…

    $4,316,401 spent
    22% of program spending
  4. Production: Assembling and distributing educational programs and materials and maintaining and managing inventory.

    $693,823 spent$33,174,833 earned by the program
    4% of program spending
  5. Research and Evaluation: Researching areas related to CFC programs and recommending new program design. Conducting or partnering with outside entities to conduct evaluations on the effectiveness of existing CFC programs.

    $196,129 spent
    1% of program spending

The 5 programs described on its FY2026 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $19,821,695.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($18M) Expenses 100 ($16M) Net assets 100 ($20M)2018 Revenue 112 ($20M) Expenses 126 ($20M) Net assets 106 ($21M)2019 Revenue 154 ($27M) Expenses 179 ($28M) Net assets 104 ($21M)2020 Revenue 192 ($34M) Expenses 225 ($35M) Net assets 94 ($19M)2021 Revenue 173 ($31M) Expenses 206 ($32M) Net assets 86 ($17M)2022 Revenue 196 ($35M) Expenses 247 ($38M) Net assets 64 ($13M)2023 Revenue 218 ($39M) Expenses 336 ($52M) Net assets -7 ($-1430116)2024 Revenue 210 ($37M) Expenses 290 ($45M) Net assets -39 ($-7956595)2025 Revenue 201 ($36M) Expenses 239 ($37M) Net assets -46 ($-9297712)2026 Revenue 192 ($34M) Expenses 174 ($27M) Net assets -9 ($-1900544)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Revenue (192)Expenses (174)Net assets (-9)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $37M to $26M (−29%).

$22M
$26M
$30M
$30M
$36M
$46M
$37M
$26M
$24M
$26M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 10% · 2026 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

0% of Committee for Children’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (95% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 270 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 7 of the last 10 reported years ran a deficit.

$2.2M
’17
$314k
’18
−$394k
’19
−$958k
’20
−$1.3M
’21
−$3.6M
’22
−$14M
’23
−$7.8M
’24
−$1.5M
’25
$7.1M
’26
1.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Andrea Lovanhill

Chief Executive Officer

As listed on its FY2026 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Listed22242225232823211921
Joined·+4+4+6+7+8+6+7+4+6
No longer listed·2639311964
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $2k → $159k.

4 of 15 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 3% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Committee for Children’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Committee for Children leans on a few funders — its largest provides 64% of grant income and the top three 95%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

64%
largest funder
95%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 53% · 2020 66% · 2021 68% · 2022 71% · 2023 63% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

13% of Committee for Children's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 33% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

66% of Committee for Children's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
UT
MD
DC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $43k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Committee for Children's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 4 as grant income climbed.

Revenue growth (annualized)8% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 268 crime & legal nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2026

Government funding Committee for Children receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $71k on record — $60k federal, $11k state.

Federal$60k
grants $0contracts $60k
19
23
24
Top agencies
  • Department of the Interior$60k
State$11k
11
17
By state
  • VT$10k
  • MA$1k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Committee for Children

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

73% of spending goes to programs.

Program 73%Management 27%Fundraising 0%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

94%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Committee for Children: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Committee for Children?
Committee for Children (Washington) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,704,654 to it, the largest being GATES FOUNDATION ($1,098,581). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Committee for Children have?
IRS filings report 15 organizations giving $1,704,654 in grants to Committee for Children, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Committee for Children?
GATES FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,098,581 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Committee for Children find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2026 (financials across 2017–2026), and the filings of 15 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing