Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

California · Nonprofit

Consortium for Children

Consortium for Children (California) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $53 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($53). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$2.0M
Revenue FY2025
1
Funders on record
$53
Grants received
$1.0M
Net assets
1/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%

Against its field

Consortium for Children runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 5,983 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin5% · above the median
Months of reserve3.9mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−0% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 5,983 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.0M) Expenses 100 ($2.0M) Net assets 100 ($647k)2018 Revenue 95 ($1.9M) Expenses 108 ($2.2M) Net assets 62 ($401k)2019 Revenue 98 ($2.0M) Expenses 100 ($2.0M) Net assets 59 ($385k)2020 Revenue 99 ($2.0M) Expenses 94 ($1.9M) Net assets 77 ($500k)2021 Revenue 94 ($1.9M) Expenses 90 ($1.8M) Net assets 93 ($603k)2022 Revenue 126 ($2.6M) Expenses 119 ($2.4M) Net assets 118 ($761k)2023 Revenue 109 ($2.2M) Expenses 106 ($2.1M) Net assets 129 ($831k)2024 Revenue 96 ($2.0M) Expenses 93 ($1.9M) Net assets 141 ($911k)2025 Revenue 100 ($2.0M) Expenses 95 ($1.9M) Net assets 158 ($1.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (100)Expenses (95)Net assets (158)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 49% · 2018 52% · 2019 53% · 2020 54% · 2021 58% · 2022 67% · 2023 63% · 2024 55% · 2025 54%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

54% of Consortium for Children’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,740 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$17k
17
$245k
18
$17k
19
$115k
20
$103k
21
$159k
22
$70k
23
$80k
24
$111k
25
3.9
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $22 → $16.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
funders
1
1
1
1

1 of 1 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Consortium for Children’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of Consortium for Children's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $53 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding Consortium for Children receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $617k on record.

State$617k
04
07
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top programs
  • GRANT IN AID$616k
  • FEDERAL$2k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Consortium for Children

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

84% of spending goes to programs.

Program 84%Management 16%Fundraising 0%

Governance

6
board members
83%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Consortium for Children: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Consortium for Children?
Consortium for Children (California) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $53 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($53). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Consortium for Children have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $53 in grants to Consortium for Children, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Consortium for Children?
AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $53 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Consortium for Children find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 1funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing