· Private foundation
Devereaux Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $160k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST ANN CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $60,000 |
| BEACON HILL | $50,000 |
| READERS 2 LEADERS | $50,000 |
| READING PARTNERS | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| HOPE HEALING & HORSES INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- R2READERS 2 LEADERS8× · 2018–2025 · $286k · revenue +116%
- LILIFTFUND INC5× · 2018–2022 · $180k · revenue +61%
- BHBEACON HILL PREPARATORY INSTITUTE4× · 2021–2024 · $140k · revenue +324%
Funded once
- ECEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +354%
- NDNEW DAY SCHOOLS INC DBA COMPASS COMMUNITY SCHOOLSone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +20%
- CFCOMMITTEE FOR CHILDRENgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +79%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Year-round, one-to-one tutoring program provided at Title 1 schools to students not at grade-level proficiency in reading. Tutors are area teens recruited and trained to deliver reading support.
The charter school is a model for the next generation of schools, working to prepare students, especially poor and minority students, for the workplace and college.
To equip all students with the academic knowledge and character development necessary to set forth confidently on the path to college and life filled with success.
The mission of The Reading League Texas is to advance the awareness, understanding, and use of evidence-aligned reading instruction in the State of Texas.
Reading results partners with schools to support students from systemically excluded communities in becoming successful readers. we believe that literacy is a basic human right, and we work to increase access and break down barriers…
The Purpose of Read 2 Win is to match a local church, business, and/or community stakeholders with all Fort Worth ISD, Crowley ISD, Eagle Mountain-Saginaw ISD, Lake Worth ISD, and Arlington ISD elementary schools by providing caring,…
Enlearn is dedicated to closing the achievement gap for K-16 students by making the entire learning ecosystem adaptive to the learning needs of each student through its groundbreaking learning platform, Enlearn Dx, which allows publishers,…
The Youth Life Foundation of Richmond operates Learning Centers to develop leaders by making long-term investments in children from under-served communities. By supporting students academically, developing their character from a young age,…
To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life
The strategic education research partnership generates innovative, scalable solutions to our schools' most pressing problems through sustained collaborations among researchers, practitioners, and designers. we work to increase equity,…
Colorado christian academy provides an innovative christ-centered education that prioritizes academic achievements and individual development of the whole child. in relationship with parents, we will build healthy foundations that result…
Our mission is to cultivate a national network of leaders who provide books, supplies, and projects to support early literacy in underserved schools.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Today Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Cr for Cw. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds READERS 2 LEADERS ↗
- Who funds LIFTFUND INC ↗
- Who funds BEACON HILL PREPARATORY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Tackle Tomorrow ↗
- Who funds TODAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE HEALING AND HORSES INC ↗
- Who funds EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW DAY SCHOOLS INC DBA COMPASS COMMUNITY SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds CR FOR CW ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Devereaux Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.