Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Illinois · Nonprofit

Chicago Society of Jungian Analysts DBA CG Jung Institute of Chicago

Chicago Society of Jungian Analysts DBA CG Jung Institute of Chicago (Illinois) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $145,465 to it, the largest being THE ARMOUR FOUNDATION INC ($135,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$427k
Revenue FY2025
6
Funders on record
$145k
Grants received
$413k
Net assets
3/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 12%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($286k) Expenses 100 ($310k) Net assets 100 ($67k)2019 Revenue 117 ($333k) Expenses 107 ($331k) Net assets 173 ($116k)2020 Revenue 116 ($331k) Expenses 103 ($318k) Net assets 192 ($129k)2021 Revenue 112 ($320k) Expenses 95 ($296k) Net assets 228 ($153k)2022 Revenue 152 ($434k) Expenses 105 ($326k) Net assets 388 ($261k)2023 Revenue 142 ($406k) Expenses 115 ($357k) Net assets 462 ($311k)2024 Revenue 162 ($463k) Expenses 126 ($391k) Net assets 568 ($383k)2025 Revenue 149 ($427k) Expenses 128 ($397k) Net assets 614 ($413k)
'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (149)Expenses (128)Net assets (614)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 10%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$25k
17
$2k
19
$13k
20
$24k
21
$108k
22
$49k
23
$72k
24
$31k
25
12
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $1k → $37k.

1 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $502k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest The Analytical Psychology Foundation of Chicago). These are real filings, and they are not money Chicago Society of Jungian Analysts DBA CG Jung Institute of Chicago raised.

From the IRS filings of Chicago Society of Jungian Analysts DBA CG Jung Institute of Chicago’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Chicago Society of Jungian Analysts DBA CG Jung Institute of Chicago leans on a few funders — its largest provides 93% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

93%
largest funder
98%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 93% · 2021 90% · 2022 96% · 2023 94%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

Chicago Society of Jungian Analysts DBA CG Jung Institute of Chicago draws 98% of its grant income from funders outside Illinois, across 4 states in all.

IL
NY
DE
KS

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

19
20
21
22
23
Illinois out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $345 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like Chicago Society of Jungian Analysts DBA CG Jung Institute of Chicago

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Illinois

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 23%Fundraising 0%

Governance

11
board members
55%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

IL

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Analytical Psychology Foundation · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Chicago Society of Jungian Analysts DBA CG Jung Institute of Chicago: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Chicago Society of Jungian Analysts DBA CG Jung Institute of Chicago?
Chicago Society of Jungian Analysts DBA CG Jung Institute of Chicago (Illinois) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $145,465 to it, the largest being THE ARMOUR FOUNDATION INC ($135,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Chicago Society of Jungian Analysts DBA CG Jung Institute of Chicago have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $145,465 in grants to Chicago Society of Jungian Analysts DBA CG Jung Institute of Chicago, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Chicago Society of Jungian Analysts DBA CG Jung Institute of Chicago?
THE ARMOUR FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $135,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Chicago Society of Jungian Analysts DBA CG Jung Institute of Chicago find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Illinois. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing