Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dana Corman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$220kEducation$97kRecreation & Sports$18kCivil Rights$5kHealth$4kFood & Nutrition$2kArts & Culture$2kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$574k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUTHERAN CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES$25,000
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES$25,000
GREENLIGHT FAMILY SERVICES$15,000
CHICAGO PSYCHOANALYTIC INSTITUTE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $160k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CENTER FOR HEALTH JUSTICE: $500 → 14%GREENLIGHT FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%CENTER ON HALSTED: $56k → 14%CENTER ON HALSTED: $44k → 14%CENTER ON HALSTED: $25k → 14%CENTER ON HALSTED: $17k → 14%CENTER ON HALSTED: $730 → 14%LET IT BE US: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$283k · 8 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
13

Total granted

$283k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+208%

Still filing today

75%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationSocial ScienceRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    Center on Halsted
    5× · 2017–2023 · $143k · revenue +61%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS
    2× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +72%
  • MU
    Marquette University
    3× · 2017–2019 · $25k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATION
    one grant, 2018 · $12k
  • BC
    BARR-HARRIS CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • SC
    SHRINERS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
2
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
3
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
4
Chicago Children's Advocacy Center

The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.

Crime & Legal
5
Center for Family Services

Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…

Human Services
6
Concordia University Chicago

Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

Education
7
Live Free Chicago

Live Free Illinois is a statewide organization partnering with over 120 congregations and directly impacted individuals to build safer more equitable communities across Illinois. Operating at the intersection of criminal justice reform and…

8
Chicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for

Providing academic support to children experiencing homelessness in Chicago and providing resources and services to families experiencing homelessness in Chicago.

Education
9
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
10
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
11
The Chicago High School for the Arts

The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…

Education
12
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago

Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago's purpose is to partner with mission-driven people and organizations across Cook and Lake counties and to witness a message of mercy and hope to a world in need through service.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of Illinois and the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Center on Halsted — $142,930 · Human ServicesCenter on HalstedGREENLIGHT FAMILY SERVICES — $15,000 · Human ServicesGREENLIGHT FAMILY SERVICES+2 more — $2,500 · Human ServicesIL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $42,500 · OtherIL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS — $32,500 · OtherLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOISLUTHERAN CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF ILLINOIS — $25,000 · OtherLUTHERAN CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF IL…UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATION — $12,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - SCHOOL OF SOCIAL…I AM WHO I AM — $4,785 · Other+8 more — $9,500 · Other+8 moreMarquette University — $25,000 · EducationMarquette Uni…TRINITY COLLEGE — $17,000 · EducationTRINITY COLLE…Northwestern University — $17,500 · Recreation & SportsCHICAGO PSYCHOANALYTIC INSTITUTE — $1,000 · Social SciencePAWS INC — $1,000 · AnimalsBEYOND HUNGER — $650 · Food & NutritionHOUSING FORWARD — $500 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$160,430Other$126,285Education$42,000Recreation & Sports$17,500Social Science$1,000Animals$1,000Food & Nutrition$650Housing & Shelter$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCenter on Halsted — $142,930 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS — $32,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF ILLINOIS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University — $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE — $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENLIGHT FAMILY SERVICES — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLET IT BE US — $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCHICAGO PSYCHOANALYTIC INSTITUTE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Saints of Chicago — $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBEYOND HUNGER — $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING FORWARD — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO ABORTION FUND — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL15.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Christopher Family Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dana Corman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Trinity College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph