· Public charity
Service Employees International Illinois Council
To protect and promote the interests of the council's more than 125,000 seiu affiliate local union members in securing better working conditions and in promoting the objectives and principles endorsed by seiu.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL ILLINOIS COUNCIL’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $157k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR AFL-CIO | $50,000 |
| CHICAGO DEFENDER CHARITIES INC | $50,000 |
| CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL LATINO CAUCUS FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| DEVELOPMENT NOW FOR CHICAGO | $20,000 |
| CHICAGO ALDERMANIC BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| CHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE | $20,000 |
| ILLINOIS LEGISLATIVE LATINO CAUCUS FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGE RIGHTS | $20,000 |
| CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION | $17,220 |
| ILLINOIS DELIVERS | $10,000 |
| PUERTO RICAN CULTUARAL CENTER | $10,000 |
| EQUALITY ILLINOIS INSTITUTE | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL UNION COUNCIL6× · 2017–2024 · $193k · revenue +6%
- CACitizen Action Illinois4× · 2017–2023 · $128k · revenue +24%
- ICILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS4× · 2018–2024 · $125k · revenue +489%
Funded once
- RFREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $275k · revenue +194%
- GIGrassroots Illinois Actionone grant, 2018 · $85k · revenue -78%
- EDEAT DRINK AND BE EVENTS LLCone grant, 2023 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.
Public education on current public policy issues
To promote job growth and communicate important issues to the public through information campaigns.
Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.
Strengthen United Way movement in Illinois
Secure racial equity and economic opportunity for all
Advocate for tort reform in Illinois by communicating with public officials and staff to influence legislation and administrative action designed to create a more equitable and balanced judicial system in Illinois.
Champion equitable responses and recovery efforts for the Latinx community impacted by COVID-19
Chicago Votes is a non-profit organization building a more inclusive democracy by putting power in the hands of young Chicagoans. We're engaging and developing a new generation of leaders by opening the doors of government and politics to…
Change illinois action fund is dedicated to advocating for solutions to the issues that undermine democracy and government efficiency in illinois, including restricted ballot access, uncompetitive elections, decreased citizen…
PILI engages, inspires and empowers those advancing equal access to justice.
Change illinois is dedicated to activities that promote honest and effective government, open elections, and high levels of voter participation in illinois.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Equality Illinois Institute and the most unlike its peers is Sierra Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO FEDERATION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL UNION COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Citizen Action Illinois ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO DEFENDER CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS ↗
- Who funds Grassroots Illinois Action ↗
- Who funds Grassroots Collaborative ↗
- Who funds Chicago Votes ↗
- Who funds Illinois Alliance for Retired Americans ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL LATINO CAUCUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO JOBS WITH JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO ALDERMANIC BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PUERTO RICAN CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds We March On Chicago ↗
- Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
- Who funds illinois One Foundation ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE JOBS ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPMENT NOW FOR CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS LEGISLATIVE LATINO CAUCUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PUSH FOR EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZEN EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LIEUTENANT GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood of Illinois ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS DELIVERS ↗
- Who funds SEIU HEALTHCARE ILLINOIS & INDIANA ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY ILLINOIS INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Chicago Federation of Labor and Industrial Union Council · Tides Foundation · Service Employees' Local No 1 · Indiana Illinois & Iowa Foundation for Fair Contracting · Seiu Healthcare Illinois & Indiana · Field Foundation of Illinois · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · AARP · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Service Employees International Illinois Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.