Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Claire Giannini Fund co Delagnes Mitchell & Linder LLP

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.2M
Granted FY2020
31
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$475k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of Claire Giannini Fund co Delagnes Mitchell & Linder LLP’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2020 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $2.4M
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.8M
$100,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Foundation for Monterey C$475,000
UCSF$400,000
Children's Mercy Hospital$350,000
Weingarten Children's Center$310,000
Kansas City Univ of Medicine and Bi$250,000
Hearing Speech Ctr of Northern CA$210,000
California State University Montere$201,265
That Man May See$200,000
Northeast Community Center$155,000
Hartnell College Foundation$148,733
Planned Parenthood Mar Monte$135,000
Boys Hope Girls Hope KC$125,000
Young Center for Immigrant Chlidren$110,000
The First Tee of Greater Kansas Cit$102,949
Every Child's Hope$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KC Healthy Kids: $50k → 16%Every Child's Hope: $100k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Claire Giannini Fund co Delagnes Mitchell & Linder LLP’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Claire Giannini Fund co Delagnes Mitchell & Linder LLPlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 31 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2020, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
20

Total granted

$11M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+6%

Still filing today

65%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $453k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationHealthCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    That Man May See Inc DBA All May See Foundation
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.3M · revenue +68%
  • KC
    Kansas City University
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.1M · revenue +148%
  • TC
    The Children's Mercy Hospital
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.1M · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • US
    UC SAN FRANCISCO
    one grant, 2017 · $350k
  • SU
    STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
    one grant, 2017 · $286k
  • GO
    GIRLS ON THE RUN OF ST LOUISgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $275k · revenue +26% · 26% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
2
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
3
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
4
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
5
Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula

Community hospital of the monterey peninsula is dedicated to identifying and meeting the changing healthcare needs of the people of the monterey peninsula and surrounding communities.we are committed to providing high-quality services at a…

Health
6
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
7
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
8
El Paso Children's Hospital Corporation

To provide compassionate, coordinated, family-centered care for children with a dedicated commitment to excellent patient outcomes, inclusive leadership and innovative pediatric research and education.

Health
9
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
10
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

11
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
12
Mentis

Mentis provides bilingual professional mental health services to people throughout the county of every age, stage, and income level.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Foundation of California and the most unlike its peers is Monterey Bay Aquarium Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr14%36%35–55yr16%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr18%2%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr14%22%35–55yr16%54%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/36
the rest of the field
12%
2,551/22,074

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
29/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UCSF — $748,630 · OtherUCSFHearing Speech Ctr of Northern CA — $626,000 · OtherHearing Speech Ctr of Northern CACalifornia State University Montere — $594,648 · OtherCalifornia State University MontereCommunity Foundation for Monterey C — $525,000 · OtherCommunity Foundation for Monterey CUC SAN FRANCISCO — $350,042 · OtherWomen's Foundation of Kansas City — $350,000 · OtherSTANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $286,000 · OtherFirst 5 Monterey County — $275,000 · OtherSTANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE - BYERS EYE INSTITUTE — $250,000 · OtherNORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER — $240,000 · Other+25 more — $2,634,246 · Other+25 moreKansas City University — $1,131,000 · EducationKansas City UniversityTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,036,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE…FOUNDATION FOR HEARING RESEARCH INC WEINGARTEN CHILDRENS CENTER — $759,984 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR HEARING RESEA…HARTNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $620,801 · EducationHARTNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION+5 more — $370,000 · Education+5 moreThat Man May See Inc DBA All May See Foundation — $1,250,000 · HealthThat Man May See Inc DB…The Children's Mercy Hospital — $1,076,920 · HealthThe Children's Mercy Ho…NATIVIDAD MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $400,000 · HealthNATIVIDAD MEDICAL FOUND…PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC — $330,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR …+2 more — $128,434 · HealthGIRLS ON THE RUN OF ST LOUIS — $275,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirls Incorporated of the Central Coast — $200,000 · Youth DevelopmentDIGITAL NEST INC — $50,386 · Youth DevelopmentCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Monterey County Inc — $200,000 · Crime & LegalRESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC — $200,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILDREN'S PLACE INC — $50,000 · Crime & LegalKANSAS CITY SYMPHONY — $275,000 · Arts & CultureKAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $25,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY — $221,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MONTEREY COUNTY — $75,000 · Philanthropy
Other$6,879,566Education$3,917,785Health$3,185,354Youth Development$525,386Crime & Legal$450,000Arts & Culture$300,000Philanthropy$296,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThat Man May See Inc DBA All May See Foundation — $1,250,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetKansas City University — $1,131,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $1,076,920 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,036,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR HEARING RESEARCH INC WEINGARTEN CHILDRENS CENTER — $759,984 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetHARTNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $620,801 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetNATIVIDAD MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC — $330,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF ST LOUIS — $275,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetKANSAS CITY SYMPHONY — $275,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER — $240,000 over 3y, 9.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY — $221,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHEARING AND SPEECH CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $206,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Monterey County Inc — $200,000 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetGirls Incorporated of the Central Coast — $200,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetRESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC — $200,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $190,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAI — $161,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetKansas City CARE Clinic — $150,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAmethyst Place Inc — $100,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetELEVATE METRO KC — $100,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetMonterey Peninsula College Foundation — $100,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetEvangelical Children's Home — $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCommunity Action Board — $80,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY — $80,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MONTEREY COUNTY — $75,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS — $70,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA — $60,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDIGITAL NEST INC — $50,386 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S PLACE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKC Healthy Kids — $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMISSOURI VALLEY TENNIS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 95% of budgetPACIFIC VISION FOUNDATION — $28,434 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nancy Buck Ransom FoundationCA24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nancy Buck Ransom Foundation · Pebble Beach Company Foundation · Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Health Forward Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Sally Hughes Church Foundation · Edward & Kathryn Mader Foundation · John W and Effie E Speas Memorial Trust · Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Claire Giannini Fund co Delagnes Mitchell & Linder LLP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Claire Giannini Fund co Delagnes Mitchell & Linder LLP?

    Find your warmest path to Claire Giannini Fund co Delagnes Mitchell & Linder LLP through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph