Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

California · Nonprofit

CalWild

CalWild (California) receives grants from 26 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,954,985 to it, the largest being The Pew Charitable Trusts ($652,419). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$897k
Revenue FY2025
26
Funders on record
$2.0M
Grants received
$724k
Net assets
17/26 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 48%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($541k) Expenses 100 ($627k) Net assets 100 ($127k)2018 Revenue 137 ($742k) Expenses 94 ($588k) Net assets 222 ($281k)2019 Revenue 119 ($643k) Expenses 89 ($560k) Net assets 287 ($364k)2020 Revenue 135 ($732k) Expenses 98 ($615k) Net assets 380 ($480k)2021 Revenue 123 ($663k) Expenses 93 ($586k) Net assets 441 ($558k)2022 Revenue 171 ($923k) Expenses 111 ($697k) Net assets 619 ($784k)2023 Revenue 153 ($828k) Expenses 141 ($884k) Net assets 575 ($727k)2024 Revenue 151 ($819k) Expenses 138 ($864k) Net assets 539 ($682k)2025 Revenue 166 ($897k) Expenses 137 ($857k) Net assets 572 ($724k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (166)Expenses (137)Net assets (572)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 5% · 2022 2% · 2024 2% · 2025 19%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$86k
17
$154k
18
$83k
19
$117k
20
$77k
21
$226k
22
$56k
23
$45k
24
$40k
25
10
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 13 funders, grant income rose $206k → $297k.

7 of 26 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)14% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CalWild’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CalWild leans on a few funders — its largest provides 33% of grant income and the top three 62%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

46% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CalWild.

33%
largest funder
62%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 80% · 2018 62% · 2019 35% · 2020 45% · 2021 28% · 2022 23% · 2023 21%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

54% of CalWild's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 65% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

CalWild draws 67% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 7 states in all.

WI
NY
PA
CA
CO
DC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $270k arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 26 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like CalWild

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 13%Fundraising 10%

Governance

12
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

68%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CalWild: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CalWild?
CalWild (California) receives grants from 26 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,954,985 to it, the largest being The Pew Charitable Trusts ($652,419). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CalWild have?
IRS filings report 26 organizations giving $1,954,985 in grants to CalWild, 17 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CalWild?
The Pew Charitable Trusts is the largest funder on record, with $652,419 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CalWild find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 26funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing