Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$27M
Granted FY2024still arriving
192
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

International$22MPhilanthropy$14MCommunity Improvement$10MReligion$9.0MEducation$5.9MCivil Rights$4.9MScience & Tech$3.0MEnvironment$2.6MOther$0
02FY2024 · 192 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k33 grants · $846k
  • $50k–250k130 grants · $14M
  • $250k+28 grants · $12M
$100,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$606M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS$1,400,000
THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTH AMER$1,000,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS AN$900,000
THE JEWISH CLIMATE TRUST INC$750,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVER$600,000
AMERICAN FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY$500,000
THE JERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC$500,000
PEF ENDOWMENT FUNDS$500,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$405,000
PEF ENDOWMENT FUNDS$400,000
SAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US$400,000
JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL-NORTH AMER$350,000
THE IDI FOUNDATION$300,000
PEF ENDOWMENT FUNDS$300,000
ISRAEL POLICY FORUM$300,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $180k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RESPECTABILITY: $50k → 8%ENTER THE JEWISH PEOPLEHOOD ALLIANC: $50k → 11%WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $80k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
HI
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of The Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 22% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 18% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 33% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$48M · 100 repeat orgs$18M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

100 repeat relationships — 83 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

100
48

Total granted

$48M
$14M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+1%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalReligionEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +3%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +28%
  • JA
    JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • NONPROFIT FINANCE FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $8.2M · revenue -41%
  • OR
    OAK RIDGE LAND BANK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1.3M · revenue -115%
  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY PROTECT NATURE ISR
    one grant, 2023 · $400k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
3
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
4
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
5
Connect Israel

Connect israel is a life-long program that aims to strengthen the gap between american jews and israelis through business, creative teamwork, and developing personal relationships.

International
6
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
7
New Jewish Narrative Inc

To support a strong and secure israel and to carry out public information activities on the middle east peace issues in the united states.

International
8
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
9
Sherit Isroel
—
10
University of Judaism Foundation
—
11
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
12
Israel-America Academic Exchange

Israel-america academic exchange (iaae) is a nonprofit organization whose mission is todeepen the understanding of israel and the middle east within the international academiccommunity. the organization organizes educational missions and…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Israel Education Resource Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Keshet Chaim Dance Ensemble. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Community FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyImmigrant Worker SupportCancer Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Health Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%4%<5yr14%14%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr19%28%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%2%<5yr14%8%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr19%18%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%36%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/127
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,633

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

125 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 125 of the 194 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
125/125
Grantees still filing
63/125
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PEF ENDOWMENT FUNDS — $6,237,985 · OtherPEF ENDOWMENT FUNDSAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVER — $2,550,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERTHE JEWISH EDUCATON PROJECT — $2,000,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH EDUCATON PROJECTTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LO — $1,950,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS AN — $1,850,000 · OtherWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST — $1,200,000 · Other+100 more — $19,088,078 · Other+100 moreTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $8,242,538 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS …PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $5,308,100 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FU…JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK — $1,547,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORKJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $1,400,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDA…+8 more — $825,000 · PhilanthropyBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $1,460,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL…NEW ISRAEL FUND — $1,226,770 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC — $1,200,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS …JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL — $1,040,000 · InternationalJEWISH AGENCY FOR…ISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC — $1,000,000 · InternationalISRAEL POLICY FOR…AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $750,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTE…AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $750,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY …THE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA — $594,500 · InternationalTHE ISRAEL INSTITUTE INC — $550,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ELNET — $530,000 · InternationalJERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 · InternationalFuente Latina Inc — $470,000 · International+13 more — $2,787,000 · International+13 moreNONPROFIT FINANCE FUND — $8,215,000 · Community ImprovementNONPROFIT FI…OAK RIDGE LAND BANK INC — $1,300,000 · Community ImprovementOAK RIDGE LA…+2 more — $165,500 · Community ImprovementSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $531,000 · EducationAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC — $500,000 · EducationNetzach Educational Network Inc — $485,000 · EducationSIXPOINT INC — $400,000 · EducationBOUNDLESS ISRAEL INC — $315,000 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $283,333 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KIDUM INC — $265,850 · EducationIsrael 21c — $240,000 · EducationThe George Washington University — $150,000 · Education+10 more — $969,250 · EducationHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $720,000 · ReligionHONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC — $480,000 · ReligionOPENDOR MEDIA INC — $375,000 · ReligionNEFESH LA — $285,000 · ReligionREBOOT INC — $275,000 · ReligionJEWBELONG INC — $250,000 · ReligionJEWISH INTERACTIVE INC — $245,000 · ReligionMOISHE HOUSE — $240,000 · ReligionONETABLE INC — $125,000 · Religion+12 more — $594,167 · ReligionANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $1,150,000 · Civil RightsZIONESS MOVEMENT INC — $260,000 · Civil RightsA WIDER BRIDGE — $200,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $125,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR COUNTERING DIGITAL HATE INC — $105,000 · Civil RightsJEWISH ELECTORATE INSTITUTE — $75,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $50,000 · Civil Rights
Other$34,876,063Philanthropy$17,323,138International$12,858,270Community Improvement$9,680,500Education$4,139,433Religion$3,589,167Civil Rights$1,965,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $8,242,538 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetNONPROFIT FINANCE FUND — $8,215,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $5,308,100 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK — $1,547,500 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $1,460,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $1,400,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $1,226,770 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC — $1,200,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $1,150,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL — $1,040,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC — $1,000,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $975,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $750,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JEWISH CLIMATE TRUST INC — $750,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $750,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $720,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC — $600,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC — $600,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC — $600,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA — $594,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE ISRAEL INSTITUTE INC — $550,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION — $545,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA — $533,333 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $531,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF ELNET — $530,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC — $500,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetNetzach Educational Network Inc — $485,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetHONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC — $480,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA — $475,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetFuente Latina Inc — $470,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetTHE HAROLD GRINSPOON FOUNDATION — $466,667 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER — $450,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $420,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC — $420,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetSIXPOINT INC — $400,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetOPENDOR MEDIA INC — $375,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PEACE COMMUNICATIONS INC — $375,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetJVS SOCAL — $370,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMEET INTERNATIONAL INC — $350,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetTHE IDI FOUNDATION INC FKA AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEMOC — $342,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel — $320,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBOUNDLESS ISRAEL INC — $315,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD — $310,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetJEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC — $300,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetNEFESH LA — $285,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $283,333 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetREBOOT INC — $275,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…The Shimon Ben Joseph…Jewish Community Fede…The Marcus Foundation…Jewish Federation Cou…The Rosalinde and Art…Jewish Communal FundCombined Jewish Phila…United Jewish Appeal-…One8 FoundationCharles and Lynn Schu…Koret Foundation
Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA54.2× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Marcus Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · One8 Foundation · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · Koret Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
  • Keshet Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 194 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home