Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

ALLIANCE ON AGING INC

ALLIANCE ON AGING INC (California) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $390,950 to it, the largest being MONTEREY PENINSULA FOUNDATION ($225,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.7M
Funders on record
14
Grants received
$391k
Net assets
$2.7M
10/14 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 3%
01What it does

What Alliance on Aging Inc does

Mission

Established in 1970, the alliance on aging celebrates 56 years of services and resources that promote the safety, dignity, autonomy, and quality of life for seniors in monterey county. As the primary link to direct services and referrals to other specialized providers, the alliance makes it possible for older adults to receive the comprehensive assistance that extends their independence, protects them from abuse, and enhances their lives. The ombudsman program, instituted in 1981, serves individuals residing in long-term care facilities, and merged with the alliance in 2004. In fy24-25, the alliance served 25,916 individuals as described in the program descriptions below and on schedule o. Services are delivered through seven major programs and other ancillary services.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Health insurance counseling and advocacy program (hicap)the hicap program provides counseling and information on topics such as medicare, health insurance benefits, and long-term care insurance, to county residents. Hicap provides essential services to medicare beneficiaries, including the elderly and those on medicare due to a disability. Services include help navigating the medicare initial enrollment, claim process and with annual open enrollment decisions. Hicap counselors are trained and registered by the state of california department of aging. They conduct seminars and individual counseling sessions to help beneficiaries (of all ages) and/or their family member navigate the medicare system and its often, complex changes. Ten community educational seminars were presented throughout the county in fy24-25, on the subjects of medicare basics & medicare update 2025. Additionally, 1821 individuals received individual health insurance counseling and education resulting in an estimated $743,270 in insurance savings. Hicap responded to 1298 quick calls from the community about general medicare questions that didn't require additional assistance and 352 people attended a medicare…

    $358,981 spent
    29% of program spending
  2. The ombudsman programthe ombudsman program is dedicated to ensuring the safety and well-being of all residents in long-term care. Ombudsman staff and volunteers advocate on behalf of the 2952 seniors and dependent adults residing in long-term care in monterey county, acting as spokespersons for those who are without family or friends to speak on their behalf, or who fear retaliation if they complain. Ombudsman's placement services benefit family members and caregivers searching for long-term care facility information and guidance for their loved ones. Ombudsman help place the senior in a safe living environment with the appropriate level of care required for optimum health as well as a positive social setting. In fy24-25, the ombudsman program opened 123 investigation cases, assisted 90 families with long term care placement guidance, provided information/assistance to 1596 individuals including care facility staff, and made 233 monitoring visits to county facilities. A total of 2042 units of service were provided.

    $311,062 spent
    25% of program spending
  3. Senior peer counseling programthe senior peer counseling program offers emotional support through no-cost, individual home-based and group peer counseling sessions to seniors who are experiencing grief and depression due to loss, loneliness, isolation, and other stresses of aging and transitions in life. In fy24-25, senior peer counseling served 203 individuals by providing a grand total of 1645 hours of service. Fifteen wellness events were conducted reaching 211 attendees.

    $259,091 spent
    21% of program spending
  4. Senior luncheon programthe senior luncheon program offers a monthly hot meal and socialization. In fy24-25, a total of 1003 hot lunches were served. A frequent feature of the meal is a bag of produce from the food bank.

    $17,302 spent
    1% of program spending
  5. Tax counseling for the elderly programthe tax counseling for the elderly program has a tangible impact on moving seniors from crisis to stability by assisting with the filing of income tax returns and economic stimulus payments and helping seniors to obtain refunds. Every extra dollar these seniors receive impacts their ability to survive, especially now that many other public assistance programs, such as those detailed previously, have disappeared. In fy24-25, the program served 2223 individuals and helped secure $1,821,726 in refunds.

    $64,283 spent
    5% of program spending
  6. Outreach and benefits checkup programthe aoa's outreach program travels throughout monterey county to inform and educate the general public, in particular seniors and their care partners, about services available to them through the alliance on aging as well as other area agency on aging-funded programs, e.g., meals on wheels, legal services for seniors, alzheimer's association. Outreach enables the alliance on aging to provide information, in english and spanish, to underserved seniors in remote areas of the county. The program also schedules "benefits checkup" appointments for low income seniors who may qualify for calfresh food assistance, home heating discounts, inexpensive cell phones, and other targeted benefits. In fy24-25, staff reached 6268 persons at local venues. Through benefits checkup appointments, the program assisted 2679 individuals and distributed 219 farmers market coupons to qualifying seniors.

    $140,626 spent
    11% of program spending
  7. Transportation programthe transportation assistance program is designed to help seniors navigate a wide variety of transportation options including bus, taxi, uber, lyft, and door-to-door services. In fy24-25, 233 individuals were provided with information and training about the local transportation options. Another 172 were provided with one on one support with taxi voucher registration and 260 people received free bus passes. The program helps to reduce isolation for older adults.

    $98,378 spent
    8% of program spending
  8. The hubthe hub is a centralized access point for healthy aging programs that promote wellness and social connections. In fy24-25, 4801 visited the hub and 211 particpated in a wellness class.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending
  9. Spiralsthe spirals consignment store offers local residents and tourists an upscale consignment and benefit store selling new and lightly used merchandise including clothing for men and women, accessories, furniture, art, books, and household goods.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 9 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,249,723.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.1M) Expenses 100 ($1.5M) Net assets 100 ($1.8M)2018 Revenue 76 ($1.6M) Expenses 111 ($1.6M) Net assets 98 ($1.8M)2019 Revenue 79 ($1.6M) Expenses 119 ($1.7M) Net assets 96 ($1.8M)2020 Revenue 90 ($1.9M) Expenses 126 ($1.8M) Net assets 100 ($1.8M)2021 Revenue 94 ($1.9M) Expenses 121 ($1.7M) Net assets 120 ($2.2M)2022 Revenue 107 ($2.2M) Expenses 136 ($2.0M) Net assets 123 ($2.2M)2023 Revenue 160 ($3.3M) Expenses 149 ($2.2M) Net assets 189 ($3.4M)2024 Revenue 101 ($2.1M) Expenses 165 ($2.4M) Net assets 180 ($3.3M)2025 Revenue 84 ($1.7M) Expenses 166 ($2.4M) Net assets 150 ($2.7M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (84)Expenses (166)Net assets (150)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $2.6M to $5.9M (+125%).

$1.9M
$1.9M
$1.9M
$2.0M
$2.3M
$2.6M
$5.9M
$5.6M
$5.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 38% · 2018 50% · 2019 56% · 2020 56% · 2021 55% · 2022 51% · 2023 32% · 2024 49% · 2025 90%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

115% of ALLIANCE ON AGING INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,793 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$622k
’17
−$29k
’18
−$92k
’19
$31k
’20
$195k
’21
$246k
’22
$1.2M
’23
−$290k
’24
−$660k
’25
1.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

John Mcpherson

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2023 and FY2024 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed151616151517131315
Joined·+4+1+2+2+2+1+4+9
No longer listed·31320547
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose $9k → $90k.

3 of 14 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 6% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ALLIANCE ON AGING INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ALLIANCE ON AGING INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 58% of grant income and the top three 74%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

72% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ALLIANCE ON AGING INC.

58%
largest funder
74%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 56% · 2018 56% · 2019 55% · 2020 38% · 2021 47% · 2022 34% · 2023 83% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

40% of ALLIANCE ON AGING INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 71% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

98% of ALLIANCE ON AGING INC's grant income comes from California funders.

CA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $22k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ALLIANCE ON AGING INC's funding base is broadening — from 3 funders to 4 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−38% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.7mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−2% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,891 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding ALLIANCE ON AGING INC receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $189k on record.

Federal$189k
grants $189kcontracts $0
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of the Treasury$189k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like ALLIANCE ON AGING INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

52% of spending goes to programs.

Program 52%Management 32%Fundraising 16%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ALLIANCE ON AGING INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ALLIANCE ON AGING INC?
ALLIANCE ON AGING INC (California) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $390,950 to it, the largest being MONTEREY PENINSULA FOUNDATION ($225,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ALLIANCE ON AGING INC have?
IRS filings report 14 organizations giving $390,950 in grants to ALLIANCE ON AGING INC, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ALLIANCE ON AGING INC?
MONTEREY PENINSULA FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $225,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ALLIANCE ON AGING INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Alliance on Aging →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 14 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing