Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

ABRAHAM AND LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED WOMEN

ABRAHAM AND LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED WOMEN (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $744,463 to it, the largest being The Washington Home Inc ($380,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$13M
Revenue FY2024
7
Funders on record
$744k
Grants received
$6.2M
Net assets
5/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($10.0M) Expenses 100 ($12M) Net assets 100 ($19M)2018 Revenue 123 ($12M) Expenses 109 ($13M) Net assets 95 ($19M)2019 Revenue 131 ($13M) Expenses 110 ($13M) Net assets 90 ($18M)2020 Revenue 127 ($13M) Expenses 116 ($14M) Net assets 80 ($16M)2021 Revenue 140 ($14M) Expenses 114 ($14M) Net assets 90 ($18M)2022 Revenue 155 ($15M) Expenses 118 ($14M) Net assets 79 ($15M)2023 Revenue 142 ($14M) Expenses 131 ($16M) Net assets 43 ($8.4M)2024 Revenue 127 ($13M) Expenses 122 ($15M) Net assets 32 ($6.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (127)Expenses (122)Net assets (32)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 0% · 2018 0% · 2019 0% · 2020 4% · 2021 2% · 2022 12% · 2023 1%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$2.3M
17
$1.0M
18
$449k
19
$1.5M
20
$14k
21
$1.1M
22
$1.8M
23
$2.2M
24
6.9
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $368 → $12k.

3 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)6% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ABRAHAM AND LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED WOMEN’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ABRAHAM AND LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED WOMEN leans on a few funders — its largest provides 51% of grant income and the top three 95%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

57% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ABRAHAM AND LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED WOMEN.

51%
largest funder
95%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 95% · 2022 57% · 2023 57%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

98% of ABRAHAM AND LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED WOMEN's grant income comes from Washington, D.C. funders.

NC
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

21
22
23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $48k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like ABRAHAM AND LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED WOMEN

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 17%Fundraising 3%

Governance

12
board members
92%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

35%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

DC

Part of a family of 2 related entities

  • Legacy Life Services Inc · exempt
  • Lisner Senior Independent Owner LP · partnership

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ABRAHAM AND LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED WOMEN: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ABRAHAM AND LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED WOMEN?
ABRAHAM AND LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED WOMEN (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $744,463 to it, the largest being The Washington Home Inc ($380,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ABRAHAM AND LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED WOMEN have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $744,463 in grants to ABRAHAM AND LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED WOMEN, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ABRAHAM AND LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED WOMEN?
The Washington Home Inc is the largest funder on record, with $380,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ABRAHAM AND LAURA LISNER HOME FOR AGED WOMEN find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing