· Private foundation
The Barcroft Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k21 grants · $460k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $170k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LAWS | $70,000 |
| Insight Memory Care Center | $50,000 |
| Friendship Place | $50,000 |
| The Hill School | $40,000 |
| Loudoun Volunteer Caregivers | $40,000 |
| Windy Hill Foundation | $40,000 |
| Arlington Thrive | $40,000 |
| Loudoun Free Clinic | $30,000 |
| Planned Parenthood | $30,000 |
| Fauquier Free Clinic | $30,000 |
| Homestretch Foundation | $30,000 |
| House of Ruth Inc | $20,000 |
| Seven Loaves Services | $20,000 |
| Boulder Crest Foundation | $20,000 |
| Piedmont Environmental Council | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $350k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IMINSIGHT MEMORY CARE CENTER3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +16%
- FPFriendship Place3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +17%
- WHWINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC3× · 2023–2025 · $120k · revenue +12%
Funded once
THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATIONone grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue 0%- LLAWSone grant, 2023 · $20k
- TMTHE MAGGIE WALKER COMMUNITY LAND TRUSTone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
GoochlandCares (GC) provides basic human services for local individuals who need help with healthcare, housing, food, clothing, and domestic violence services, providing a safety net for 2,135 Goochland residents and their families in 2024.
Assisted Living and Nursing Care
Retirement housing
Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.
DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.
To advocate for domestic violence victims, at-risk children, and other vulnerable individuals by providing over $22.8m in pro bono legal services, social service referrals, and on-going support; to train and support a strong network of…
Home of va ensures equal access to housing opportunities by building individual capacity, ensuring compliance with fair housing laws, and promoting effective public policy to advance housing justice.
To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.
Low-income housing.
To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…
Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arlington Thrive and the most unlike its peers is Elevated Access Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INSIGHT MEMORY CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Friendship Place ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON THRIVE ↗
- Who funds WINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOUDOUN CITIZENS FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds THE CATOCTIN FOUNDATION dba LOUDOUN FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FAUQUIER FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE ABORTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOUDOUN VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS A FAITH IN ACTION PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL CORPORATION OF MIDDLEBURG ↗
- Who funds Seven Loaves Services Inc ↗
- Who funds Elevated Access Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF EXUMA CO CHAMBERLIN OWEN & CO INC ↗
- Who funds A PLACE TO BE ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds Shelter House Inc ↗
- Who funds THE MAGGIE WALKER COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Loudoun and Northern Fauquier Counties · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · United Way of the National Capital Area · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Van Metre Family Foundation Inc · The Bank of Clarke County Foundation · Graham Foundation Inc · Frank Mangano Foundation · The Luminescence Foundation Inc · Wise Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Barcroft Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.