Skip to content

· Public charity

Zonta Club of Newport Harbor Foundation

Zonta Club of Newport Harbor Foundation is part of a global service organization of professionals working together to empower women worldwide through service and advocacy.

$86k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$49kHuman Services$47kInternational$42kArts & Culture$6kHousing & Shelter$6k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $61,545, the rows itemized in this filing. The $85,745 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $24,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chapman Univ Film School$35,000
OC United Together$10,000
Kherut$9,045
Radiant Futures$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CASA DE LA FAMIGLIA: $3k → 10%HELPING OTHERS PREPARE FOR ETERNITY: $5k → 10%Kherut: $9k → 10%OC United Together: $10k → 10%Radiant Futures: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
2
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
3
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
4
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
5
Covenant House California

Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.

Human Services
6
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
7
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
8
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
9
Colette's Children's Home Inc

Colettes childrens home provides housing and supportive services to homeless women and children with nowhere to turn. we work to remove the barriers that cause displacement and provide the means for transition from homelessness to stable…

Housing & Shelter
10
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services
11
House of Ruth Inc

House of ruth is dedicated to preventing domestic violence and ensuring the safety and well-being of those impacted.

Human Services
12
Crisis House

The mission of crisis house is to respond immediately to stop the cycle of domestic violence and homelessness and to connect families and individuals to crucial resources that empower them to renew their lives.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thomas House Temporary Shelter; the most unlike its peers is Chapman University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Chapman Univ Film School: $35,000 · OtherChapman Univ Film SchoolZONTA INTERNATIONAL: $19,800 · OtherZONTA INTERNATIONALZONTA INTERNATIONAL FUND: $17,000 · OtherZONTA INTERNATIONAL FUNDAge Well Senior Services Inc: $5,100 · OtherAge Well Senior Services IncFRIENDLY CENTER INC: $5,000 · OtherFRIENDLY CENTER INCPROJECT FOR HOPE ALLIANCE: $5,000 · OtherPROJECT FOR HOPE ALLIANCE+2 more: $3,500 · OtherOC UNITED TOGETHER: $10,000 · Human ServicesOC UNITED TOGETHERKHERUT: $9,045 · Human ServicesKHERUTWOMENS TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC RADIANT FUTURES: $7,500 · Human ServicesWOMENS TRANSITIONAL LIVIN…HELPING OTHERS PREPARE FOR ETERNITY: $5,000 · Human ServicesHELPING OTHERS PREPARE FO…CASA DE LA FAMILIA: $2,500 · Human ServicesCASA DE LA FAMILIACHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $13,484 · EducationCHAPMAN UN…ORANGE COUNTY CHILDRENS THERAPEUTIC ARTS CENTER: $6,200 · Arts & CultureGRANDMA'S HOUSE OF HOPE: $6,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$90,400Human Services$34,045Education$13,484Arts & Culture$6,200Housing & Shelter$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetZONTA INTERNATIONAL: $19,800 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $13,484 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOC UNITED TOGETHER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOMENS TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC RADIANT FUTURES: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetORANGE COUNTY CHILDRENS THERAPEUTIC ARTS CENTER: $6,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGRANDMA'S HOUSE OF HOPE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAge Well Senior Services Inc: $5,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING OTHERS PREPARE FOR ETERNITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDLY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCASA DE LA FAMILIA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA23.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation · St Joseph Health System Foundation · Orange County's United Way · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · The Devto Support Foundation · American Woodmark Foundation Inc · Sempra Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zonta Club of Newport Harbor Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zonta Club of Newport Harbor Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Zonta Club of Newport Harbor Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Zonta Club of Newport Harbor Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Zonta Club of Newport Harbor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph