· Private foundation
Zero Six One Nine Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $85k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $21,000 |
| SAMARITAN INN MCKINNEY TEXAS | $20,000 |
| CHARITY WATER | $12,000 |
| NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES | $10,500 |
| THE OTHER ONES FOUNDATION INC | $10,500 |
| THE CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK | $10,500 |
| LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION | $9,000 |
| HUGS CAFE INC | $8,500 |
| FOR THE NATIONS REFUGEE OUTREACH | $4,000 |
| TOTAL OF ALL OTHER CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS PAID | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $207k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
CHARITY GLOBAL INC8× · 2018–2025 · $94k · revenue +36%- NONETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC7× · 2019–2025 · $63k · revenue +235%
- AFALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC3× · 2023–2025 · $33k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- DCDFW CANINES FOR VETERANSone grant, 2019 · $30k
- BIBECAUSE I SAID I WOULDgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +78%
- ADALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $19k · revenue +32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…
The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.
Caritas of austin provides a home and tailored services to prevent and end homelessness.
The successful transition of u.s. military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.
Established in 1934, vna helps older adults live with dignity and independence at home by providing in-home care, food and friendship for the ill, hungry, and homebound.
To lead texas communities to make homelessness rare, brief, and non- curring; to help communities strategically plan to prevent and end homelessness.
One tail at a time west texas otat wtx serves the rural communities of west texas by supporting animal shelter operations rescuing and sheltering homeless unwanted companion animals dogs and cats primarily arranging their veterinary care…
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…
To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).
NextOp helps place talented enlisted service members and veterans into civilian careers through highly individualized preparation and an array of programming.
To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homes for Our Troops Inc and the most unlike its peers is Charity Global Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE OTHER ONES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds BECAUSE I SAID I WOULD ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CITY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds For the Nations Refugee Outreach ↗
- Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds DALLAS PETS ALIVE ↗
- Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
- Who funds Texas Music Project Inc ↗
- Who funds Homeless Veterans Services Of Dallas Inc ↗
- Who funds HUGS CAFE INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE DOG RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS PALLIATIVE CARE ASSOCIATES DBA AUSTIN PALLIATIVE CARE ↗
- Who funds BIG THOUGHT ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN EXPLORE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MATH & SCIENCE INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds MY POSSIBILITIES ↗
- Who funds HUG IT FORWARD INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Celanese Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Morton H Meyerson Family Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Give Lively Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Zero Six One Nine Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.