How much did ZERO SIX ONE NINE FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of ZERO SIX ONE NINE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

dallasaustin

2019

—

2020

food bankcare

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k9 grants · $61k
$10k–50k2 grants · $29k

$8,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.1M

Total assets

Largest grants

SAMARITAN INN MCKINNEY TEXAS$19,000
CHARITY WATER$10,000
NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES$9,000
MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY FIRST VILLAGE$9,000
THE OTHER ONES FOUNDATION INC$9,000
LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION$8,000
ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$6,000
TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$6,000
WYLIE CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER$6,000
CITY HOUSE$4,000
FOR THE NATIONS REFUGEE OUTREACH$4,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 9%. 84% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$431k · 15 repeat orgs$225k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +164% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$431k

$225k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+164%

+37%

Still filing today

53%

39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NO
NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES
6× · 2019–2024 · $52k · revenue +294%
TO
THE OTHER ONES FOUNDATION INC
2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +1398%
CH
CITY HOUSE
3× · 2022–2024 · $17k · revenue +20%

Funded once

DC
DFW CANINES FOR VETERANS
one grant, 2019 · $30k
BI
BECAUSE I SAID I WOULDgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +108%
AA
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION
one grant, 2018 · $19k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Homeless Network of Texas

To lead texas communities to make homelessness rare, brief and non- recurring. to help communities strategically plan to prevent and end homelessness.

Community Improvement

Arlington Life Shelter

The mission of Arlington Life Shelter is to promote self-sufficiency by providing shelter, employment programs and transitional services for North Texans impacted by homelessness.

Housing & Shelter

Open Arms Inc

The mission of Open Arms, Inc. is to provide underserved children in North Texas with specialized medical, educational and therapeutic care, and holistic support services for their families.

Health

Camp Fire First Texas

Camp Fire First Texas invests in North Texas communities by providing out-of-school time and outdoor learning programs for children and youth while also offering workforce development programs for early childhood educators. We envision a…

Youth Development

The Net Fw Inc

The net disrupts sex trafficking and provides holistic support to survivors during their recovery.

Community Improvement

Caritas of Austin

Caritas of austin's mission is to prevent and end homelessness in greater austin.

—

Atx Helps

ATX Helps was created to fill gaps in the spectrum of services available to people in Austin who are experiencing homelessness.

Human Services

The McCombs School of Business

To provide support to The University of Texas McCombs School of Business.

Education

Operation Care International Inc

To help the homeless in the city of dallas, texas and beyond.

Human Services

Humane Society of North Texas

To save, shelter, protect and advocate for all animals in need in North Texas.

Animals

Dallas Afterschool

Dallas Afterschool levels the playing field for children of all races and economic backgrounds by increasing the quality and availability of afterschool and summer programs for over 19,000 students in Dallas County.

Education

Texas 2036

Texas 2036 empowers texans to make informed decisions using data and long-term strategic planning to sustain texas as the best place to live and work.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Because I Said I Would and the most unlike its peers is Homes for Our Troops Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/19

Grantees still filing

16/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$461,875Human Services$121,625Public Benefit$20,000Animals$16,750Arts & Culture$14,000Health$12,000Housing & Shelter$9,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments FoundationTX22.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Rees-Jones Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Moody Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · McKesson Foundation Inc · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Hillcrest Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ZERO SIX ONE NINE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TEXAS MUSIC PROJECT.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 550817516 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TEXAS MUSIC PROJECT, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 8% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Zero Six One Nine Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Zero Six One Nine Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ZERO SIX ONE NINE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Zero Six One Nine Foundation?

More from the funding graph

ZERO SIX ONE NINE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Zero Six One Nine Foundation?

More from the funding graph