Skip to content
Zero Six One Nine Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Zero Six One Nine Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$109k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$241kHealth$218kFood & Nutrition$70kAnimals$57kHousing & Shelter$47kPublic Benefit$21kArts & Culture$18kInternational$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $85k
$10,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$21,000
SAMARITAN INN MCKINNEY TEXAS$20,000
CHARITY WATER$12,000
NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES$10,500
THE OTHER ONES FOUNDATION INC$10,500
THE CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$10,500
LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION$9,000
HUGS CAFE INC$8,500
FOR THE NATIONS REFUGEE OUTREACH$4,000
TOTAL OF ALL OTHER CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS PAID$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $207k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $11k → 14%CITY HOUSE: $9k → 5%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $11k → 14%CITY HOUSE: $4k → 5%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $9k → 14%CHARITY WATER: $22k → 17%CITY HOUSE: $4k → 5%LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION: $9k → 14%CHARITY WATER: $12k → 17%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $9k → 14%CHARITY WATER: $10k → 17%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $9k → 14%CHARITY WATER: $10k → 17%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $9k → 14%CHARITY GLOBAL INC: $10k → 17%LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%CHARITY WATER: $10k → 17%LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%CHARITY WATER: $10k → 17%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $5k → 14%CHARITY WATER: $10k → 17%HOMELESS VETERANS SERVICES OF DALLAS: $9k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
CO
AZ
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$528k · 14 repeat orgs$237k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
27

Total granted

$528k
$215k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+32%

Still filing today

71%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsEducationArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CHARITY GLOBAL INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $94k · revenue +17%
  • NO
    NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $63k · revenue +235%
  • AF
    ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $33k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • DC
    DFW CANINES FOR VETERANS
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • BI
    BECAUSE I SAID I WOULDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +78%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $19k · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
2
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
3
Caritas of Austin

Caritas of austin provides a home and tailored services to prevent and end homelessness.

—
4
Usvets - Texas

The successful transition of u.s. military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Human Services
5
Visiting Nurse Association of Texas

Established in 1934, vna helps older adults live with dignity and independence at home by providing in-home care, food and friendship for the ill, hungry, and homebound.

Health
6
Homeless Network of Texas

To lead texas communities to make homelessness rare, brief, and non- curring; to help communities strategically plan to prevent and end homelessness.

Community Improvement
7
One Tail At a Time West Texas

One tail at a time west texas otat wtx serves the rural communities of west texas by supporting animal shelter operations rescuing and sheltering homeless unwanted companion animals dogs and cats primarily arranging their veterinary care…

Animals
8
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
9
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
10
HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
11
NextOp Inc

NextOp helps place talented enlisted service members and veterans into civilian careers through highly individualized preparation and an array of programming.

Public Benefit
12
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homes for Our Troops Inc; the most unlike its peers is Charity Global Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAMARITAN INN MCKINNEY TEXAS: $134,875 · OtherSAMARITAN INN MCKINNEY TEXASMOBILE LOAVES AND FISHESCOMMUNITY FIRST VILLAGE: $32,750 · OtherMOBILE LOAVES AND FISHESCOMMUNITY FIRST VILLAGEWYLIE CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $32,125 · OtherWYLIE CHRISTIAN CARE CENTERDFW CANINES FOR VETERANS: $30,000 · OtherDFW CANINES FOR VETERANSIndividual grant recipient: $18,375 · Other+19 more: $134,125 · Other+19 moreCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $94,000 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INCNETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $62,625 · Human ServicesNETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES IN…THE OTHER ONES FOUNDATION: $28,500 · Human ServicesTHE OTHER ONES FOUNDATIONLIFESAVERS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesLIFESAVERS FOUNDATIONCITY HOUSE INC: $16,750 · Human ServicesCITY HOUSE INCHomeless Veterans Services Of Dallas Inc: $8,750 · Human ServicesALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $33,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S…TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $21,375 · HealthTEXAS SCOTT…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $19,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S…CENTRAL TEXAS PALLIATIVE CARE ASSOCIATES DBA AUSTIN PALLIATIVE CARE: $5,000 · HealthCENTRAL TEX…BECAUSE I SAID I WOULD: $20,000 · Public BenefitVETERAN TICKETS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Public BenefitDALLAS PETS ALIVE: $10,000 · AnimalsBLUE DOG RESCUE INC: $6,750 · AnimalsNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR RESCUED ANIMALS DBA TIGER CREEK ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $2,500 · AnimalsSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationAUSTIN EXPLORE INC: $4,750 · EducationNATIONAL MATH & SCIENCE INITIATIVE INC: $4,500 · EducationTexas Music Project Inc: $9,000 · Arts & CultureBIG THOUGHT: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$382,250Human Services$235,625Health$78,375Public Benefit$21,000Animals$19,250Education$14,250Arts & Culture$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $94,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $62,625 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $33,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OTHER ONES FOUNDATION: $28,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLIFESAVERS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $21,375 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBECAUSE I SAID I WOULD: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $19,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HOUSE INC: $16,750 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFor the Nations Refugee Outreach: $12,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS PETS ALIVE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $9,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Music Project Inc: $9,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetHomeless Veterans Services Of Dallas Inc: $8,750 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBLUE DOG RESCUE INC: $6,750 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL TEXAS PALLIATIVE CARE ASSOCIATES DBA AUSTIN PALLIATIVE CARE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIG THOUGHT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN EXPLORE INC: $4,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL MATH & SCIENCE INITIATIVE INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMY POSSIBILITIES: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUG IT FORWARD INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR RESCUED ANIMALS DBA TIGER CREEK ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments Fou…The Moody FoundationCommunities Foundatio…The Rees-Jones Founda…Austin Community Foun…Celanese FoundationMcKesson Foundation I…Morton H Meyerson Fam…Raymond James Charita…Give Lively Foundatio…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Community Foundation …
Texas Instruments FoundationTX23.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Celanese Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Morton H Meyerson Family Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Give Lively Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zero Six One Nine Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zero Six One Nine Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Zero Six One Nine’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home