Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Yum Brands Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10M
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$4.3M
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Human Services$23MInternational$14MPhilanthropy$8.1MHealth$7.0MCommunity Improvement$5.8MEducation$5.5MFood & Nutrition$5.0MEmployment$2.7MOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $144k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $950k
  • $250k+8 grants · $9.2M
$15,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAF America$4,308,006
University of Louisville Foundation$1,649,000
Emergency Assistance Foundation$1,000,000
American Red Cross$750,000
The Giving Kitchen Initiative Inc$530,000
Dare to Care$400,000
American Online Giving Foundation$323,035
Conservation International Foundation$250,000
Fund for the Arts$150,000
Metro United Way$125,000
Evolve502 INC$125,000
ProLiteracy Worldwide Inc$119,780
OneTen Coalition Inc$100,000
Initiative for Competitive Inner City$100,000
Adventurous Minds Produce Extraordinary Dreams Inc$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $24.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Emergency Assistance Foundation: $9.0M → 11%Children's Bureau: $100k → 13%Gift of Adoption Fund: $3k → 14%Youth Encouragement Services: $500 → 13%Emergency Assistance Foundation: $7.1M → 11%Emergency Assistance Foundation: $3.3M → 11%CitySquare: $25k → 14%Emergency Assistance Foundation: $2.0M → 11%Emergency Assistance Foundation: $1.0M → 11%Community Partners of Dallas: $3k → 14%Emergency Assistance Foundation: $200k → 11%Jonathan's Place: $3k → 14%Jonathan's Place: $10k → 14%American Red Cross: $750k → 14%American Red Cross: $250k → 14%Home of the Innocents: $50k → 15%Blessings in a Backpack: $400k → 15%Blessings in a Backpack Inc: $80k → 15%Blessings in a Backpack: $2k → 15%Elder Serve: $5k → 15%Neighborhood House Inc: $10k → 15%Neighborhood House Inc: $6k → 15%Neighborhood House Inc: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 17% of Yum Brands Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Yum Brands Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$60M · 50 repeat orgs$8.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

50 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
105

Total granted

$60M
$7.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+5%

Still filing today

72%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $714k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +42%
  • HI
    HATCH INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2.1M · revenue +521% · 85% of their budget
  • DT
    DARE TO CARE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • O
    OneTen
    one grant, 2023 · $1.1M
  • HE
    Hatch Enterprise
    one grant, 2024 · $700k
  • WE
    West End Opportunity Partnership
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -94%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

5
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
6
Kentucky Center for Economic Policy Inc

To improve the quality of life for all kentuckians through research, education and advocacy on important policy issues facing the commonwealth.

Public Benefit
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
9
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
10
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

12
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Local Initiatives Support Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Sarabande Books Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity College Foundatio…Community FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Environmental Conservation …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Independent K-12 SchoolsYouth Sports ProgramsJewish Community Organizati…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Christian Missionary Organi…Affordable Housing Developm…School Parent OrganizationsPublic Library OperationsCancer Support ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesSchool District FoundationsLocal History MuseumsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and AdvocacyUnited Way AffiliatesElementary Literacy TutoringCommunity Arts CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%45%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%11%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/127
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,438

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

119 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 119 of the 177 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
118/119
Grantees still filing
59/119
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC — $22,604,428 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION IN…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,000,000 · Human Services+10 more — $699,000 · Human ServicesYUM - Employee Medical Relief Fund — $6,461,478 · OtherYUM - Employee Medical Relief FundOneTen — $1,125,000 · OtherUK Online Giving Foundation — $1,055,968 · OtherAmerican Red Cross - Louisville KY — $1,030,000 · OtherLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $1,999,999 · OtherLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORAT…INITIATIVE FOR A COMPETITIVE INNER CITY INC — $1,880,000 · OtherINITIATIVE FOR A COMPETITIVE INNER…FUND FOR THE ARTS INC — $1,420,000 · OtherFUND FOR THE ARTS INC+111 more — $9,341,309 · Other+111 moreCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $8,811,534 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDA…THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC — $2,515,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GIVING KITCHEN I…AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $1,834,745 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONLINE GIVI…METRO UNITED WAY INC — $1,238,050 · PhilanthropyMETRO UNITED WAY INC+3 more — $275,500 · PhilanthropyASHOKA — $4,690,000 · InternationalGIVE2ASIA — $500,000 · International+1 more — $32,500 · InternationalHATCH INC — $2,125,485 · Food & NutritionDARE TO CARE INC — $2,002,477 · Food & Nutrition+5 more — $255,000 · Food & NutritionUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC — $2,280,000 · EducationSimmons College of Kentucky Inc — $651,000 · EducationFIRST BOOK — $250,000 · EducationPROLITERACY WORLDWIDE — $119,780 · Education+22 more — $287,359 · EducationONETEN COALITION INC — $2,625,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $500,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $150,000 · Civil Rights
Human Services$24,303,428Other$24,313,754Philanthropy$14,674,829International$5,222,500Food & Nutrition$4,382,962Education$3,588,139Civil Rights$3,475,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC — $22,604,428 over 6y, 10% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $8,811,534 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetASHOKA — $4,690,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetONETEN COALITION INC — $2,625,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC — $2,515,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC — $2,280,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetHATCH INC — $2,125,485 over 2y, 85% of budgetDARE TO CARE INC — $2,002,477 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $1,999,999 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetINITIATIVE FOR A COMPETITIVE INNER CITY INC — $1,880,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $1,834,745 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR THE ARTS INC — $1,420,000 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetMETRO UNITED WAY INC — $1,238,050 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVOLVE502 INC — $750,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetSimmons College of Kentucky Inc — $651,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetTACO BELL FOUNDATION INC — $560,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGIVE2ASIA — $500,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $500,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWest End Opportunity Partnership — $500,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $482,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetFIRST BOOK — $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE INC — $225,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNorton Healthcare Inc — $200,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF QUT IN AMERICA FOUNDATION — $180,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetGREATER LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC — $180,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROLITERACY WORLDWIDE — $119,780 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S BUREAU INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER LOUISVILLE PRIDE FOUNDATION INC — $87,500 over 2y, 26% of budgetCornell University — $75,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ORANGE COUNTY — $70,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY INC — $55,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVINEYARD CONSERVATION SOCIETY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetFEEDING TEXAS — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE RESEARCH — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KENTUCKIANA INC — $32,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPEED ART MUSEUM — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA
  • Who funds ASHOKA
  • Who funds ONETEN COALITION INC
  • Who funds THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HATCH INC
  • Who funds DARE TO CARE INC
  • Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION
  • Who funds INITIATIVE FOR A COMPETITIVE INNER CITY INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE ARTS INC
  • Who funds METRO UNITED WAY INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds EVOLVE502 INC
  • Who funds Simmons College of Kentucky Inc
  • Who funds TACO BELL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GIVE2ASIA
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC
  • Who funds West End Opportunity Partnership
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC
  • Who funds FIRST BOOK
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE INC
  • Who funds Norton Healthcare Inc
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Gheens Foundation IncKY67.6× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Cralle Foundation Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · James Graham Brown Foundation Inc · Brown-Forman Foundation · V V Cooke Foundation Corporation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Yum Brands Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc12% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Yum Brands Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Yum Brands Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 177 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph