· Private foundation
Yt Hwang Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k14 grants · $152k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE KOREA SOCIETY | $80,000 |
| HUFS FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFOR | $50,000 |
| CITY HARVEST | $16,500 |
| MARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS | $15,000 |
| METROPOLITAN OPERA | $10,000 |
| HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| KJ CHOI FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| YOUTH AMERICA GRAND PRIX | $10,000 |
| MINKWON CENTER | $10,000 |
| KOREAN AMERICAN YOUTH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| BELLA MUSIC FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| ENGLEWOOD HEALTH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| KAFSC | $10,000 |
| KAYAC | $10,000 |
| BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TKTHE KOREA SOCIETY8× · 2018–2025 · $257k · revenue +44%
- COCOUNCIL OF KOREAN AMERICANS INC7× · 2017–2023 · $110k · revenue +83%
CITY HARVEST INC7× · 2019–2025 · $91k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- UJUPENN JUTTA DORSCHER-KIM FUNDone grant, 2019 · $10k
- GCGIVE CHANCES INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +203%
- TJTHE JUDITH EHM FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The foundation's mission is to promote the cultural understanding and cultural exchange through artistic endeavors, with a focus on creating bridges between the global arts community and the korean people in south korea and abroad.
Comparative studies and research concerning the political, economic, social, and cultural barriers and ties among the usa,south korea and north korea.
The mission of korean culture center of new york, inc. is to promote and organize korean cultural, arts, educational, and social activities. it aims to establish a venue where all korean americans and other groups can participate in…
The mission of the korean american community center of san francisco and bay area (kaccsf) is to build community and enhance the quality of life for the korean american residents in the san francisco and bay area. we are a place-based…
To promote and strengthen our diverse community by educating present and future generations in the evolving korean-american experience in hawaii.
Founded in 2009, global peace foundation (gpf) works domestically and internationally to promote sustainable peace, social cohesion, and compassionate development. we believe a peaceful future is within our reach, and that our shared…
To promote cultural exchange and mutual understanding for international friendship and goodwill.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Korean-American Youth Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is K J Choi Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE KOREA SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HUFS FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL OF KOREAN AMERICANS INC ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY TOUCH INC ↗
- Who funds BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH AMERICA GRAND PRIX INC ↗
- Who funds FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE KOREAN-AMERICAN YOUTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds KJ CHOI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOORI SHOW INC ↗
- Who funds KOREAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BELLA MUSIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GIVE CHANCES INC ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC ARTS MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds K J CHOI FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Csk Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Yt Hwang Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Give Chances Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.