Skip to content

· Private foundation

Young Family Foundation of Waterloo

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$500k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$1.4MAnimals$1.0MEducation$341kEnvironment$271kCommunity Improvement$210kPhilanthropy$162kPublic Benefit$60kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNI FOUNDATION$150,000
WATERLOO DEVELOPMENT CORP$100,000
WARTBURG COLLEGE$50,000
CEDAR VALLEY MONARCH PROJECT$30,000
CITY OF WATERLOO LEISURE SERVICES$30,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY-IOWA CHAPTER$20,000
DUCKS UNLIMITED - IOWA CHAPTER$20,000
IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION$20,000
PHEASANTS FOREVER-IOWA CHAPTER$20,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$15,000
GABLE MUSEUM NT'L WRESTLING$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF NE IOWA$5,000
BOY SCOUTS WINNEBGO COUNCIL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DUCKS UNLIMITED - IOWA CHAPTER: $20k → 6%PHEASANTS FOREVER-IOWA CHAPTER: $20k → 14%WARTBURG COLLEGE: $50k → 7%MONARCH RESEARCH PROJECT: $50k → 9%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $156k → 17%DUCKS UNLIMITED - IOWA CHAPTER: $20k → 6%PHEASANTS FOREVER-IOWA CHAPTER: $20k → 14%WARTBURG COLLEGE: $50k → 7%IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $52k → 10%CITY OF WATERLOO LEISURE SERVICES: $100k → 17%DUCKS UNLIMITED - IOWA CHAPTER: $20k → 6%WARTBURG COLLEGE: $25k → 7%NATURE CONSERVANCY-IOWA CHAPTER: $52k → 10%BLACK HAWK CO CONSERVATION: $76k → 17%IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $35k → 10%CITY OF WATERLOO LEISURE SERVICES: $70k → 17%IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $32k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $56k → 17%IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $32k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $56k → 17%CITY OF WATERLOO LEISURE SERVICES: $50k → 17%CITY OF WATERLOO LEISURE SERVICES: $50k → 17%BLACK HAWK CO CONSERVATION: $40k → 17%CITY OF WATERLOO LEISURE SERVICES: $30k → 17%CITY OF WATERLOO: $30k → 17%CITY OF WATERLOO: $30k → 17%CITY OF WATERLOO LEISURE SERVICES: $30k → 17%CITY OF WATERLOO LEISURE SERVICES: $28k → 17%BLACK HAWK COUNTY CONSERVATION: $25k → 17%WATERLOO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $210k → 17%WATERLOO DEVELOPMENT CORP: $100k → 17%CEDAR VALLEY MONARCH PROJECT: $83k → 17%CEDAR VALLEY MONARCH PROJECT: $75k → 17%CEDAR VALLEY MONARCH PROJECT: $75k → 17%GABLE MUSEUM NT'L WRESTLING: $75k → 17%CEDAR VALLEY ARBORETUM: $75k → 17%CEDAR VALLEY MONARCH PROJECT: $75k → 17%NATIONAL WRESTLING HALL OF FAME: $75k → 17%WATERLOO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $52k → 17%WATERLOO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $52k → 17%WATERLOO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $52k → 17%WATERLOO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $52k → 17%WATERLOO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%CEDAR VALLEY MONARCH PROJECT: $40k → 17%CEDAR VALLEY MONARCH PROJECT: $30k → 17%GROUT MUSEUM: $25k → 17%NATIONAL WRESTLING HALL OF FAME: $25k → 17%CEDAR FALLS IOWA SCHOOLS: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 20 repeat orgs$261k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$3.6M
$241k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+10%

Still filing today

30%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UNI FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $400k
  • CO
    CITY OF WATERLOO LEISURE SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $398k
  • CV
    CEDAR VALLEY MONARCH PROJECT
    6× · 2020–2025 · $378k

Funded once

  • CF
    CEDAR FALLS IOWA SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • MR
    MONARCH RESEARCH PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +156%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Waterfowl Association Inc

The purpose of the association shall be to restore and conserve wisconsin's waterfowl and wetland resources; to educate state waterfowlers during their progression from natural resource consumer to steward; and to promote governmental…

Environment
2
Grow Cedar Valley

Working to increase the economic vitality and wealth in the waterloo/cedar falls area and surrounding economic region.

—
3
Iowa College Foundation

The foundation is organized to further the growth and development of private colleges and universities of higher education in iowa.

—
4
Community Foundation for Western Iowa

The community foundation for western iowa is dedicated to creating a lasting legacy in our region by engaging our citizens and communities for durable change and fostering a culture of philanthropy. this is where giving grows.

Philanthropy
5
Watertown Development Company

Economic development in the watertown, south dakota area.

—
6
The Foundation for the Iowa City Community School District

The foundation for the iowa city community school district connects the community with our schools to ensure every student has extraordinary learning experiences. together we empower teachers and district staff and inspire students to…

—
7
Waterbury Development Corporation

To stimulate and support economic and housing development within the communities of the city of waterbury.

Community Improvement
8
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—
9
Waukesha County Community Foundation

Wccf is a pool of permanent endowment and project funds created primarily by and for the people of waukesha county to provide grant support to charitable organizations. the intent of the foundation is to serve a broad spectrum of the…

Philanthropy
10
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
11
Des Moines Water Works Park Foundation

The des moines water works park foundation is dedicated to developing and executing the master plan created for water works park. the plan turns the park into a national model incorporating recreation, education and conservation within the…

Recreation & Sports
12
Western Dakota Regional Water System

To provide a source of water from the missouri river or any other feasible source to its members to construct, build and own plats, facilities and pipelines for the transporting of said water to its members.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waterloo Community Schools Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Monarch Research Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNI FOUNDATION: $400,000 · OtherUNI FOUNDATIONCITY OF WATERLOO LEISURE SERVICES: $398,000 · OtherCITY OF WATERLOO LEISURE SERVICESCEDAR VALLEY MONARCH PROJECT: $377,500 · OtherCEDAR VALLEY MONARCH PROJECTBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $358,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBNATURE CONSERVANCY-IOWA CHAPTER: $181,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY-IOWA CHAPTERDUCKS UNLIMITED - IOWA CHAPTER: $146,000 · OtherPHEASANTS FOREVER-IOWA CHAPTER: $141,000 · OtherBLACK HAWK CO CONSERVATION: $131,735 · OtherGABLE MUSEUM NT'L WRESTLING: $125,000 · OtherNATIONAL WRESTLING HALL OF FAME: $100,000 · Other+16 more: $471,820 · Other+16 moreWATERLOO COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $239,500 · EducationWATERLOO C…WARTBURG COLLEGE: $125,000 · EducationWARTBURG C…+1 more: $10,000 · EducationWATERLOO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $310,000 · Community ImprovementIOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $236,000 · EnvironmentWATERLOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $162,300 · PhilanthropyMONARCH RESEARCH PROJECT: $50,000 · AnimalsGROUT MUSEUM INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCEDAR VALLEY SOCCER CLUB: $6,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,830,055Education$374,500Community Improvement$310,000Environment$236,000Philanthropy$162,300Animals$50,000Arts & Culture$25,000Recreation & Sports$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWATERLOO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $310,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetWATERLOO COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $239,500 over 6y, 18% of budgetIOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $236,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWATERLOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $162,300 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetWARTBURG COLLEGE: $125,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMONARCH RESEARCH PROJECT: $50,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetWINNEBAGO COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #173: $30,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetGROUT MUSEUM INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCEDAR FALLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCEDAR VALLEY SOCCER CLUB: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WATERLOO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WATERLOO COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WATERLOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WARTBURG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MONARCH RESEARCH PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds WINNEBAGO COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #173 ↗
  • Who funds GROUT MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR FALLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR VALLEY SOCCER CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Otto Schoitz FoundationIA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Otto Schoitz Foundation · Max and Helen Guernsey Charitable Foundation · Black Hawk County Gaming Association · Lsb Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Young Family Foundation of Waterloo funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Young Family Foundation of Waterloo. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Young Family Foundation of Waterloo?

    Find your warmest path to Young Family Foundation of Waterloo through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Young Family Foundation of Waterloo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph