· Private foundation
Otto Schoitz Foundation
Improve the health and well-being of the community and its individual members within the greater cedar valley region, defined as the geographical area within 30 miles from the center of waterloo, iowa.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k28 grants · $631k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $724k
- $250k+5 grants · $2.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTHEAST IOWA FOOD BANK | $800,000 |
| WATERLOO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $500,000 |
| IOWA HEARTLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $365,000 |
| CITY OF WATERLOOLEISURE SERVICES | $333,334 |
| CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DBA HOUSE OF HOPE | $325,000 |
| CEDAR FALLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| SUCCESSLINK | $90,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CEDAR VALLEY | $75,000 |
| CEDAR VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY | $75,000 |
| GRIN AND GROW LTD DBA GROWING MINDS EARLY LEARNING CENTER | $63,750 |
| IOWA LEGAL AID | $62,500 |
| ONE CEDAR VALLEY | $57,500 |
| JESSE COSBY CENTER | $50,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY OF WATERLOOCEDAR FALLS | $50,000 |
| YWCA OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
76 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $611k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IHIOWA HEARTLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY7× · 2018–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +292% · 55% of their budget
- CVCEDAR VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC6× · 2020–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +83%
- CCCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT7× · 2018–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +109% · 61% of their budget
Funded once
- COCITY OF WATERLOO - WATERLOO LEISURE SERVICESone grant, 2019 · $331k
- COCITY OF WATERLOOWATERLOO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTone grant, 2021 · $310k
- FVFRIENDSHIP VILLAGE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue +215%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…
In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.
Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.
To provide advocacy and services for disadvantaged persons and bring about institutional change for the benefit of the people we serve and the community at large. (see schedule o).to achieve this mission, scicap operates programs to…
ICCJ assists children in custody disputes through child focused education and legal services. ICCJ provides education and legal services on a reduced fee or at no charge based on the ability to pay.
Through dynamic partnerships, quality family services, advocacy and education, neicac advances community development and improves social and economic conditions for individuals and families with limited resources.
Community action of eastern iowa respectfully partners with people to improve their health, finances, and education.
The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.
Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.
Child day care center
To promote the development, growth and utilization of childrens advocacy centers and multidisciplinary teams to better serve Iowas abused and neglected children and their families.
The community foundation for western iowa is dedicated to creating a lasting legacy in our region by engaging our citizens and communities for durable change and fostering a culture of philanthropy. this is where giving grows.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Four Oaks Family and Children's Services and the most unlike its peers is Black Hawk County 4H & Ffa Foundati. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IOWA HEARTLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds CEDAR VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST IOWA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CEDAR VALLEY ↗
- Who funds PEOPLES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds HAWKEYE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDN ↗
- Who funds SUCCESSLINK INC ↗
- Who funds GRIN & GROW LTD ↗
- Who funds WATERLOO COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WATERLOO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds COVENANT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CEDAR VALLEY HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT VOICES IN ACTION ↗
- Who funds Iowa Legal Aid ↗
- Who funds LEADER VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPERATION THRESHOLD INC ↗
- Who funds JESSE COSBY NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ONE CITY UNITED ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY YMCA OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Dubuque ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds 1619 FREEDOM SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NORTH STAR COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WATERLOO HOUSING TRUST FUND ↗
- Who funds YWCA BLACK HAWK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CEDAR FALLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Youth Art Team ↗
- Who funds Riverview Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Max and Helen Guernsey Charitable Foundation · Black Hawk County Gaming Association · Lsb Foundation · Cedar Valley United Way · R J McElroy Trust · Dupaco RW Hoefer Foundation · Van G Miller Family Charitable Foundation · Trustage Foundation Inc · Duroe Family Foundation · The Gallagher Family Foundation · The Accel Foundation · GreenState Credit Union
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Otto Schoitz Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.