· Private foundation
Max and Helen Guernsey Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of MAX AND HELEN GUERNSEY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k38 grants · $173k
- $10k–50k87 grants · $2.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRANSFORMATIONS BY CEDAR VALLEY ANGELS | $35,000 |
| SUCCESSLINK INC | $35,000 |
| CEDAR VALLEY PRESCHOOL & CHILDCARE CENTER | $35,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $35,000 |
| UNI FOUNDATION | $33,000 |
| CEDAR VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY | $30,000 |
| RIYO REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT & YOUTH ORGANIZATION | $30,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $30,000 |
| YWCA OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY | $30,000 |
| WATERLOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| FRIENDS OF NATIONAL CATTLE CONGRESS | $30,000 |
| DUNKERTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $30,000 |
| CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEV DBA HOUSE OF HOPE | $30,000 |
| WAYPOINT SERVICES | $30,000 |
| GROUT MUSEUM INC | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
119 repeat relationships — 78 still active in FY2025, 41 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $563k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CEDAR VALLEY6× · 2020–2025 · $300k · revenue +20%
- SISUCCESSLINK INC6× · 2020–2025 · $260k · revenue +119%
- GMGROUT MUSEUM INC6× · 2020–2025 · $200k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- CCCHRISTIAN COMM DEV DBA HOUSE OF HOPEone grant, 2024 · $61k
- CFCOMMUNITY FDN OF NE IA - B H COUNTY COVID-19 FUNDone grant, 2020 · $50k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue -13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…
In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.
Child day care center
ICCJ assists children in custody disputes through child focused education and legal services. ICCJ provides education and legal services on a reduced fee or at no charge based on the ability to pay.
The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.
Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.
To provide advocacy and services for disadvantaged persons and bring about institutional change for the benefit of the people we serve and the community at large. (see schedule o).to achieve this mission, scicap operates programs to…
To promote the development, growth and utilization of childrens advocacy centers and multidisciplinary teams to better serve Iowas abused and neglected children and their families.
Community action of eastern iowa respectfully partners with people to improve their health, finances, and education.
The community foundation for western iowa is dedicated to creating a lasting legacy in our region by engaging our citizens and communities for durable change and fostering a culture of philanthropy. this is where giving grows.
Facilitate economic opportunity, business success, community engagement, prosperity, and quality of life for rural western iowa
To provide leadership in our communities to 1) identify our most pressing human care needs, 2) to work together to direct the time, energy and resources towards addressing those needs to improve our quality of life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waypoint Services and the most unlike its peers is Waverly Public Library Founation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 55. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 9% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 5% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
107 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 107 of the 250 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CEDAR VALLEY ↗
- Who funds SUCCESSLINK INC ↗
- Who funds WATERLOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GROUT MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds CEDAR VALLEY PRESCHOOL & CHILD CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CEDAR VALLEY HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds TRANSFORMATIONS BY CEDAR VALLEY ANGELS ↗
- Who funds GRIN & GROW LTD ↗
- Who funds HAWKEYE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDN ↗
- Who funds IOWA HEARTLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds CEDAR VALLEY ARBORETUM & BOTANIC GARDENS ↗
- Who funds YWCA BLACK HAWK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CEDAR BEND HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Youth Art Team ↗
- Who funds CEDAR VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH STAR COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds JESSE COSBY NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC ↗
- Who funds CEDAR FALLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds VISION TO LEARN ↗
- Who funds MARCHING AGAINST THE DARKNESS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST IOWA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE LARRABEE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Riverview Center Inc ↗
- Who funds WATERLOO COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CEDAR FALLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CEDAR FALLS COMMUNITY THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds ALL IN MENTORING ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds BREMER COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Maroon & White Inc ↗
- Who funds Iowa Legal Aid ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Otto Schoitz Foundation · Lsb Foundation · Black Hawk County Gaming Association · Cedar Valley United Way · R J McElroy Trust · Van G Miller Family Charitable Foundation · The Gallagher Family Foundation · Dupaco RW Hoefer Foundation · Duroe Family Foundation · GreenState Credit Union · Trustage Foundation Inc · Pauline R Barrett Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Max and Helen Guernsey Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.