Skip to content
Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic

The mission of yvfwc is to improve lives and strengthen the health of the communities we serve by providing quality and accessible health care to all regardless of ability to pay.

$22M
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$18M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$85MHealth$20MRecreation & Sports$186kHousing & Shelter$148kFood & Nutrition$59kInternational$25kCommunity Improvement$25kPublic Benefit$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $18,952,190, the rows itemized in this filing. The $21,940,308 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,988,118 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$18,000,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$336M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AGENA$18,000,000
MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$952,190
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $85.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AGENA: $21.0M → 17%AGENA: $18.0M → 17%AGENA: $18.0M → 17%AGENA: $15.0M → 17%AGENA: $13.0M → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$86M · 7 repeat orgs$19M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$86M
$19M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    AGENA
    6× · 2019–2025 · $85M · revenue +103% · 96% of their budget
  • TM
    THE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +45%
  • GC
    Grace City Outreach
    2× · 2021–2023 · $108k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • YH
    YVFWC HEALTHCARE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT II
    one grant, 2023 · $14M · 100% of their budget
  • YH
    YVFWC HEALTHCARE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $4.2M · 42% of their budget
  • YV
    YAKIMA VALLEY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic

The mission of yvfwc is to improve lives and strengthen the health of the communities we serve by providing quality and accessible health care to all regardless of ability to pay.

Health
2
Greater Yakima Chamber of Commerce

We exist to be an advocate for our members and our business community to strengthen the development of our economy.

—
3
Yelm Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote business, civic, social and cultural awareness that maintain or increase the positive economic climate and ethical values of the community.

—
4
Yakima Arboretum Foundation

Received funds and managed assets for the sole benefit of the yakima area arboretum, a washington nonprofit corporation and 501(c)(3) organization.

Environment
5
Yakima Neighborhood Health Services

To improve the quality of life in our communities by providing accessible and integrated health and social services, ending homelessness, and offering unique learning opportunities for students of health professions.

Health
6
Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Association

Partnering locally to support the communities we serve in the ways they need it most. because healthy communities need more than health care.

Health
7
Wenatchee Valley Hospital

We are dedicated to improving our patients' health by providing safe, high-quality care in a compassionate and cost-effective manner.

—
8
Whatcom Alliance for Healthcare Access C/O Chuckanut Health Fdn

Waha is a nonprofit organization based in bellingham, washington whose mission is to connect people to health care and facilitate transformation of the current system into one that improves health, reduces cost and improves the experience…

—
9
Young Womens Christian Association

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism and empowering women.

Human Services
10
Yakima County Development Association dba New Vision Foundation

Enhance the income, quality of life and employment stability of yakima county residents by retaining, expanding, and recruiting business and industry.

Community Improvement
11
Highline Medical Center Foundation

Highline Medical Center Foundation brings our community together to support exceptional health care, close to home, for all who need it. Thanks to the generosity of our caring neighbors and friends, we help ensure that St Anne Hospital has…

Health
12
Columbia Valley Community Health

The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yakima Valley Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Spokane District Dental Society Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AGENA: $85,000,000 · Human ServicesAGENAYVFWC HEALTHCARE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT II: $14,001,005 · HealthYVFWC HEALTHCARE FACI…YVFWC HEALTHCARE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT: $4,178,556 · HealthYVFWC HEALTHCARE FACI…THE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $1,095,124 · HealthTHE MEMORIAL FOUNDATI…+4 more: $235,362 · HealthGrace City Outreach: $108,000 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSION OF YAKIMA WASH: $40,000 · OtherYAKIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · OtherAREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER OF SOUTHWEST OREGON: $25,000 · OtherWASHINGTON ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH: $15,000 · OtherCITY OF TOPPENISH: $13,709 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $10,762 · OtherSUNRISE OUTREACH CENTER OF YAKIMA: $15,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherYAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $150,000 · PhilanthropyTOPPENISH COMMUNITY CHEST: $44,374 · Food & NutritionCENTRAL WASHINGTON FAIR ASSOCIATION: $36,000 · Recreation & SportsJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON: $25,000 · International
Human Services$85,000,000Health$19,510,047Other$257,471Philanthropy$150,000Food & Nutrition$44,374Recreation & Sports$36,000International$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAGENA: $85,000,000 over 6y, 96% of budgetYVFWC HEALTHCARE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT II: $14,001,005 over 1y, 100% of budgetYVFWC HEALTHCARE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT: $4,178,556 over 1y, 42% of budgetTHE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $1,095,124 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetYAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGrace City Outreach: $108,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetYAKIMA VALLEY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $100,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTOPPENISH COMMUNITY CHEST: $44,374 over 3y, 29% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION OF YAKIMA WASH: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL WASHINGTON FAIR ASSOCIATION: $36,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCLINICA MEDICAL NUESTRA SENORA DE GUADALUPE: $30,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON: $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER OF SOUTHWEST OREGON: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSUNRISE OUTREACH CENTER OF YAKIMA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSpokane District Dental Society Foundation: $5,362 over 1y, 14% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Yakima Valley Communi…Seattle FoundationUnited Way of Central…Delta Dental of Washi…Northwest Harvest EmmBnsf Railway Foundati…Morgan Stanley Global…Baird Foundation IncNetwork for GoodVanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…
Yakima Valley Community FoundationWA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Yakima Valley Community Foundation · Seattle Foundation · United Way of Central Washington · Delta Dental of Washington · Northwest Harvest Emm · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Clinica Medical Nuestra Senora De Guadalupe: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home