Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yagan Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.4MPublic Benefit$1.3MHealth$733kHuman Services$716kCivil Rights$618kScience & Tech$600kCommunity Improvement$534kCrime & Legal$524kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+2 grants · $550k
$79,921
Median grant
7
States reached
$51M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Chicago Center for Free Expression$300,000
The Institute for Political Innovation$250,000
Harvard University-Opportunity Insights$200,000
Yale University$200,000
Lawndale Christian Legal Center$150,000
The Honeycomb Project$128,820
Urban Initiatives$100,000
Represent US$100,000
Unite America Institute Inc$100,000
Start Early FKA Ounce of Prevention$100,000
Fund for Constitutional Government$100,000
Overdose Crisis Response Fund$79,921
One Goal$50,000
Invest for Better$50,000
Rush University Medical Center$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Overdose Crisis Response Fund: $80k → 7%Metropolitan Family Services: $250 → 14%Urban Initiatives: $100k → 14%Urban Initiatives: $100k → 14%Urban Initiatives: $100k → 14%Urban Initiatives: $10k → 14%Urban Initiatives: $3k → 14%Urban Initiatives: $1k → 14%A Better Chicago: $500 → 14%Honeycomb Project: $150k → 14%Honeycomb Project: $102k → 14%Honeycomb Project: $100k → 14%The Honeycomb Project: $100k → 14%The Honeycomb Project: $22k → 14%The Honeycomb Project: $20k → 14%The Honeycomb Project: $129k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
MD
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.1M · 34 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
62

Total granted

$6.1M
$858k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+63%

Still filing today

65%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $542k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesPublic BenefitHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HONEYCOMB PROJECT INC NFP
    7× · 2017–2024 · $623k · revenue +32% · 45% of their budget
  • LC
    LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN LEGAL CENTER
    6× · 2017–2024 · $495k · revenue +173%
  • O
    ONEGOAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $335k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • CC
    Chicago Community Trust Donor Advised Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $160k
  • UO
    University of Chicago Center for Free Enterprise
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
3
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
6
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
7
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
8
Chief Executives for Corporate Purpose Inc

Chief executives for corporate purpose (cecp) is the only business counsel and network dedicated to driving measurable returns on purpose. we promote responsible purpose-driven business as it increases customer loyalty, builds employee…

Philanthropy
9
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
10
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
11
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
12
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Nature Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
73/75
Grantees still filing
51/75
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Harvard University-Opportunity Insights: $600,000 · OtherHarvard University-Opportunity InsightsUniversity of Chicago Center for Free Expression: $600,000 · OtherUniversity of Chicago Center for Free ExpressionStart Early FKA Ounce of Prevention: $520,000 · OtherStart Early FKA Ounce of PreventionBoys Hope Girls Hope International: $350,000 · OtherBoys Hope Girls Hope InternationalHarvard University-Faculty of Arts & Sciences: $204,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · OtherChicago Community Trust Donor Advised Fund: $160,000 · OtherUniversity of Chicago Center for Free Enterprise: $150,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR POLITICAL INNOVATION INC: $250,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR POLITICAL INNOVATION INC+69 more: $730,388 · Other+69 moreTHE HONEYCOMB PROJECT INC NFP: $622,758 · Human ServicesTHE HONEYCOMB P…URBAN INITIATIVES INC: $313,500 · Human ServicesURBAN INITIATIV…OVERDOSE CRISIS RESPONSE FUND: $79,921 · Human ServicesOVERDOSE CRISIS…+3 more: $3,750 · Human ServicesRepresentUs: $415,000 · Public BenefitRepresentUsUNITE AMERICA INSTITUTE INC: $300,000 · Public BenefitUNITE AMERICA I…FUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT: $200,000 · Public BenefitFUND FOR CONSTI…ISSUE ONE: $100,000 · Public BenefitISSUE ONE+1 more: $1,000 · Public BenefitLAWNDALE CHRISTIAN LEGAL CENTER: $495,000 · Crime & Legal+3 more: $13,500 · Crime & LegalKARAM FOUNDATION: $140,100 · PhilanthropySOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS CHICAGO INC: $105,000 · PhilanthropyBoston Foundation Inc: $30,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACTASSETSINC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Philanthropy+5 more: $19,500 · PhilanthropyMETROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $261,545 · Community ImprovementINVEST FOR BETTER INC: $100,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $6,000 · Community ImprovementONEGOAL: $335,250 · Youth Development+1 more: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,964,388Human Services$1,019,929Public Benefit$1,016,000Crime & Legal$508,500Philanthropy$369,600Community Improvement$367,545Youth Development$336,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HONEYCOMB PROJECT INC NFP: $622,758 over 7y, 45% of budgetLAWNDALE CHRISTIAN LEGAL CENTER: $495,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetRepresentUs: $415,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetONEGOAL: $335,250 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetURBAN INITIATIVES INC: $313,500 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetUNITE AMERICA INSTITUTE INC: $300,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetMETROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $261,545 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR POLITICAL INNOVATION INC: $250,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetFUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT: $200,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetKARAM FOUNDATION: $140,100 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS CHICAGO INC: $105,000 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetISSUE ONE: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERS IN TECH INC: $100,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetINVEST FOR BETTER INC: $100,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetOVERDOSE CRISIS RESPONSE FUND: $79,921 over 1y, 54% of budgetNATIONAL HARM REDUCTION COALITION: $70,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBoston Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACTASSETSINC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFreedmen Heirs Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVocal Justice: $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetJERSEY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $14,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetVILCAP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPitch In: $10,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLEXINGTON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISTRICT 100 FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROOT & REBOUND: $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSTART EARLY: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $5,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IMPACT SOCIETY: $5,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARCHCITY DEFENDERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORWARD THROUGH FERGUSON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPWARDLY GLOBAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILYFARMED DBA GOOD FOOD CATALYST: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Alliance Against Sexual Exploitation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTONIIC INSTITUTE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTE EDUCATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HONEYCOMB PROJECT INC NFP ↗
  • Who funds LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN LEGAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RepresentUs ↗
  • Who funds ONEGOAL ↗
  • Who funds URBAN INITIATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITE AMERICA INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR POLITICAL INNOVATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT ↗
  • Who funds KARAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds ISSUE ONE ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds LEADERS IN TECH INC ↗
  • Who funds INVEST FOR BETTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OVERDOSE CRISIS RESPONSE FUND ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL HARM REDUCTION COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds IMPACTASSETSINC ↗
  • Who funds Freedmen Heirs Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Vocal Justice ↗
  • Who funds JERSEY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John D and Catherine T Macarthur FoundationIL29.2× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Fifth Third Chicagoland Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · The Rockefeller Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yagan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yagan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Boston Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Yagan Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Yagan Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 111 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Yagan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph