Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wyant Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$114k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$382kRecreation & Sports$331kReligion$104kArts & Culture$79kHuman Services$59kHealth$41kPhilanthropy$13kEnvironment$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $87k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$775k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Church of the Redeemer$27,500
Various Small Charities$21,850
Cincinnati Parks Foundation$15,000
City Squash$12,500
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Denison University$9,000
Squash and Education Alliance$7,500
Cincinnati Opera$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%STRATEGIES TO END HOMELESSNESS: $1k → 16%CINCINNATI SQUASH ACADEMY: $12k → 16%CINCINNATI SQUASH ACADEMY: $10k → 16%CINCINNATI SQUASH ACADEMY: $10k → 16%CINCINNATI SQUASH ACADEMY: $10k → 16%CINCINNATI SQUASH ACADEMY: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$760k · 15 repeat orgs$440k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
29

Total granted

$760k
$410k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-3%

Still filing today

47%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DENISON UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2025 · $119k · revenue +20%
  • TS
    THE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL
    2× · 2018–2023 · $102k · revenue +47%
  • SA
    SQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $68k · revenue +503%

Funded once

  • SH
    Seven Hills School
    one grant, 2024 · $101k
  • US
    US SQUASH
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • HS
    Hearing Speech and Deaf
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cintrifuse

To empower Cincinnati entrepreneurs to launch bold, scalable startups; and we work to improve the odds of those startups growing into transformational companies.

Community Improvement
2
Cleveland Municipal School District Transformation

The cleveland transformation alliance (cta) is a trusted community partner working to ensure every student is engaged in a high-quality, equitable education. the cta gives families and students the information they need to commit to their…

Education
3
Capitol Squash Inc

To empower the youth of Hartford to reach their potential as athletes, scholars, and engaged citizens.

Recreation & Sports
4
Urban Squash Cleveland

Urban Squash Cleveland's mission is to promote the academic success and the physical and mental health of Cleveland youth through intensive educational and enrichment programming, training and competition in the sport of squash, and…

Recreation & Sports
5
Hillel the Foundation of Jewish Campus Life

The purpose of Hillel is to be a center for enriching the lives of Jewish students in the Greater Cincinnati area and to strengthen Jewish identity through social and a broad range of programs and services in an atmosphere that is…

—
6
Cincinnati Aquatic Club

To offer children and young adults a top quality program that develops, trains and competes as competitive swimmers year-round in a supportive and motivating enviroment that respects, challenges and nurtures them as athletes, students, and…

Recreation & Sports
7
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra

Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.

Arts & Culture
8
United States Tennis Association- Middle States Section

The org. is a section of the united states tennis assoc. and is dedicated to carrying out the goals of the national assoc. within its region, particularly with respect to promoting tennis opportunities for juniors and adults of all…

—
9
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber

To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.

—
10
INTERalliance of Greater Cincinnati

To inspire and assist young talent to pursue an IT career in Greater Cincinnati.

Youth Development
11
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
12
Cincinnati Scholarship Foundation

The mission of the organization is to connect students residing in greater cincinnati with post-high school scholarship opportunities to pursue their educational goals

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Greater Cincinnati Foundation; the most unlike its peers is David M Herskovits Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Seven Hills School: $101,000 · OtherSeven Hills SchoolUS SQUASH: $100,000 · OtherUS SQUASHCHURCH OF THE REDEEMER: $87,500 · OtherCHURCH OF THE REDEEMERVarious Small Charities: $83,490 · OtherVarious Small CharitiesSquash Education Alliance: $55,000 · OtherSquash Education AllianceCincinnati Opera: $54,820 · OtherCincinnati OperaVARIOUS SMALL DONATIONS: $48,471 · OtherVARIOUS SMALL DONATIONS+25 more: $234,353 · Other+25 moreDENISON UNIVERSITY: $119,000 · EducationDENISON UNIVERSITYTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL: $102,000 · EducationTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOLDAVID M HERSKOVITS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $6,000 · EducationSQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $67,700 · Recreation & SportsSQUASH AND E…METROSQUASH NFP: $24,500 · Recreation & SportsMETROSQUASH …Cincinnati Parks Foundation: $18,000 · Recreation & SportsCincinnati P…City Squash Inc: $12,500 · Recreation & SportsCity Squash …FC CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsFC CINCINNAT…Emanuel Community Center DBA Cincinnati Squash Academy: $47,500 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesGREEN UMBRELLA: $10,000 · EnvironmentCincinnati Playhouse in the Park: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION: $500 · Arts & CultureTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$764,634Education$237,000Recreation & Sports$132,700Human Services$48,500Environment$10,000Arts & Culture$6,500Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY: $119,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL: $102,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $67,700 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetEmanuel Community Center DBA Cincinnati Squash Academy: $47,500 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetMETROSQUASH NFP: $24,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCincinnati Parks Foundation: $18,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCity Squash Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFC CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDAVID M HERSKOVITS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetGREEN UMBRELLA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSQUASHDRIVE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCincinnati Playhouse in the Park: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKATHERINE DELMAR BURKE SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFOUNDRY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetStrategies to End Homelessness Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Emanuel Community Center DBA Cincinnati Squash Academy ↗
  • Who funds METROSQUASH NFP ↗
  • Who funds Cincinnati Parks Foundation ↗
  • Who funds City Squash Inc ↗
  • Who funds FC CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DAVID M HERSKOVITS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREEN UMBRELLA ↗
  • Who funds SQUASHDRIVE ↗
  • Who funds Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park ↗
  • Who funds THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vista Foundation · Maxwell C Weaver Foundation · Ruth J & Robert a Conway Foundation Inc · Ed & Joann Hubert Family Foundation Inc · William P Anderson Foundation Central Trust · Woodward Family Charitable Foundation · Louise Taft Semple Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wyant Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wyant Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wyant Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Wyant Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wyant Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph