· Private foundation
Vista Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $71k
- $10k–50k35 grants · $593k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $55,000 |
| KEY WEST LITERARAY SEMINAR | $45,000 |
| CAM | $30,000 |
| PRAYING FOR CHANGE FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| MANIFEST CREATIVE RESEARCH GALLERY | $25,000 |
| AFGHAN SCOUT RELIEF FUND | $25,000 |
| CAM FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| CAMPING & EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN | $25,000 |
| CINCINNATI ZOO | $20,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| CINCINNATI CARE | $20,000 |
| CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND | $20,000 |
| SITE SANTE FE | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $101k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
98 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2024, 61 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KWKEY WEST LITERARY SEMINAR INC6× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +175%
- SSSITE SANTA FE8× · 2017–2024 · $83k · revenue +65%
- CCCINCINNATI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL8× · 2017–2024 · $82k · revenue +20%
Funded once
NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESSone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +15%- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $30k
- AAART ACADEMYone grant, 2023 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.
California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…
Ccad fosters a diverse community that educates students so they can unleash their creative power to shape culture and commerce.
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.
Our mission is to operate, maintain, and oversee an independent college of art and design.
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
As a trusted and connected partner, we inspire generous people to invest in a more equitable and vibrant region now and for generations to come.
The mission statement of the cleveland institute of art is as follows: to cultivate creative leaders who inspire people, strengthen communities, and contribute to a thriving and sustainable economy through an innovative education in art…
The mission of The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati (TCT) is to educate, entertain and engage audiences of all ages through professional theatrical productions and arts education programming. Our vision is to awaken a lifelong love of…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Museum Association and the most unlike its peers is The Ladd Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 197 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHATFIELD EDGE ↗
- Who funds NEURO-ACUPUNCTURE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds KEY WEST LITERARY SEMINAR INC ↗
- Who funds SITE SANTA FE ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds LA SOUPE INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds TSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds CISE ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds CAMPING AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OUR DAILY BREAD ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
- Who funds PLAYING FOR CHANGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE JOE BURROW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEECHWOOD HOME ↗
- Who funds Living Arrangements for the Developmentally Disabled Inc ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds The Contemporary Arts Center ↗
- Who funds THE HILLSIDE TRUST ↗
- Who funds TAFT MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds REGIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI NATURE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER ↗
- Who funds ART OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park ↗
- Who funds MONROE COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Louise Taft Semple Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Earthward Bound Foundation · Williams Foundation · The Wohlgemuth Herschede Foundation Co Fifth Third Bank Na Agent · Robert a & Marian K Kennedy Charitable Trust · L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phd · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Vista Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.