Skip to content

· Private foundation

WW & JJ Choi Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$537k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$204k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.9MReligion$1.3MHuman Services$292kPhilanthropy$190kCommunity Improvement$170kFood & Nutrition$33kArts & Culture$18kHealth$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $54k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $415k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Graceland Bible Church$204,000
Messengers of Mercy$60,000
New Life Mission Church$51,100
My Hometown Heroes Inc$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Nuguna Mission International$36,000
Pioneer$18,000
Eden Church$8,300
Build Up Foundation$5,000
Asian Pacific Islander Legal Outrea$5,000
Ablecloset$5,000
City Team Ministires$5,000
Samaritan House$5,000
Milal Mission In Northern CA$5,000
Second Harvest Food Bank$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $267k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Global Children Foundation: $1k → 10%United Korean Association of Hawaii: $5k → 9%My Hometown Heroes Inc: $50k → 10%My Hometown Heroes Inc: $50k → 10%My Hometown Heroes Inc: $40k → 10%Next Door Solutions: $200 → 8%My Hometown Heroes Inc: $30k → 10%My Hometown Heroes Inc: $20k → 10%My Hometown Heroes Inc: $20k → 10%My Hometown Heroes Inc: $14k → 10%My Hometown Heroes Inc: $10k → 10%My Hometown Heroes Inc: $10k → 10%Pomeroy Recreation Reabilitation: $10k → 10%Pomeroy Recreation Reabilitation: $5k → 10%Tall Trees Foundation: $1k → 8%Tall Trees Foundation: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NV
CA
CO
VA
AR
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of WW & JJ Choi Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

WW & JJ Choi Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 27 repeat orgs$470k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
19

Total granted

$4.0M
$450k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+26%

Still filing today

48%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionEducationHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    Immanuel Cambodia
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +990% · 100% of their budget
  • EF
    E3EM FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $300k · revenue +12% · 99% of their budget
  • MH
    MY HOMETOWN HEROES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $244k · revenue +52% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • NL
    New Life Mission Association
    one grant, 2018 · $400k
  • KE
    Korean Emmanuel Presbyterian Church
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • K
    KACS
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Korean World Mission Council
Religion
2
K J Choi Foundation
—
3
The Korean Library Foundation
Education
4
Korean Senior Citizens Association of San Fernando Valley
Recreation & Sports
5
Joyful Korean Community Church

The mission of the church is to go into the world and make disciples by declaring the gospel of Jesus Christ in the power of the Spirit and gathering these disciples into churches, that they might worship the Lord and obey his commands now…

Religion
6
Korean American Network International

To spread the gospel to the underserved countries

International
7
Korean American United Foundation
—
8
Korean Community Center of the East Bay

The mission of KCCEB is to empower the Korean American and other communities of the Bay Area through education, advocacy, service and the development of community-based resources.

—
9
Asian Childrens Mission

Asian Children's Mission, ACM, exists to care, protect, and educate, vulnerable children in Myanmar (Burma).

Human Services
10
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
11
The Korean Church of Ann Arbor

To fullfil our mission we embrace the following purpose to bring believers to spritual maturity through Fellowship with other Christian, Learing and living Christs teachings, Outreach to all people, Worshipping Him alone and doing and…

Religion
12
San Francisco & Bay Area Korea Center

The mission of the korean american community center of san francisco and bay area (kaccsf) is to build community and enhance the quality of life for the korean american residents in the san francisco and bay area. we are a place-based…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cityteam Ministries; the most unlike its peers is E3EM Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW LIFE MISSION CHURCH: $463,700 · OtherNEW LIFE MISSION CHURCHGraceland Bible Church: $411,000 · OtherGraceland Bible ChurchNew Life Mission Association: $400,000 · OtherNew Life Mission AssociationE3EM FOUNDATION: $300,000 · OtherE3EM FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $220,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEmpower Renew Foundation: $165,000 · OtherEmpower Renew FoundationEden Church: $147,400 · OtherEden Church+24 more: $251,600 · Other+24 moreImmanuel Cambodia: $1,439,696 · EducationImmanuel Cambodia+2 more: $18,000 · EducationMY HOMETOWN HEROES: $244,000 · Human ServicesPomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center: $15,000 · Human Services+4 more: $7,700 · Human ServicesNUGUNA MISSION INTERNATIONAL: $149,000 · ReligionCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $42,000 · ReligionKPAM FOUNDATION: $16,000 · Religion+2 more: $9,000 · ReligionMESSENGERS OF MERCY: $180,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMELP - ABLECLOSET: $10,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 · HealthDISABILITY RIGHTS CALIFORNIA: $5,000 · Civil RightsKQED INC: $1,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,358,700Education$1,457,696Human Services$266,700Religion$216,000Philanthropy$190,000Health$11,000Civil Rights$5,000Arts & Culture$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetImmanuel Cambodia: $1,439,696 over 6y, 100% of budgetE3EM FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 6y, 99% of budgetMY HOMETOWN HEROES: $244,000 over 9y, 29% of budgetMESSENGERS OF MERCY: $180,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetNUGUNA MISSION INTERNATIONAL: $149,000 over 7y, 60% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $42,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKPAM FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetPomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSilicon Valley Korean School: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMELP - ABLECLOSET: $10,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISABILITY RIGHTS CALIFORNIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOREA CHRISTIAN GOSPEL MISSION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSouth of Market Child Care Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE VOICE ETHNIC MISSIONS: $4,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetKQED INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTALL TREES FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetKorean American Community Services Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Immanuel Cambodia ↗
  • Who funds E3EM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MY HOMETOWN HEROES ↗
  • Who funds MESSENGERS OF MERCY ↗
  • Who funds NUGUNA MISSION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CITYTEAM MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds KPAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Pomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center ↗
  • Who funds Looking Glass Korean School ↗
  • Who funds Silicon Valley Korean School ↗
  • Who funds MELP - ABLECLOSET ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds DISABILITY RIGHTS CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds KOREA CHRISTIAN GOSPEL MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF HAWAII ↗
  • Who funds South of Market Child Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds ONE VOICE ETHNIC MISSIONS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN5.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization WW & JJ Choi Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from WW & JJ Choi Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on WW & JJ Choi’s filings →

    More from the funding graph