· Public charity
Wright-Hennepin Electric Trust
The purpose of the trust shall be the accumulation and disbursement of funds for charitable and educational purposes primarily in the areas served by wright-hennepin cooperative electric association.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $140,583 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $245,340 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $104,757 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $97k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CROSS FOOD SHELF | $16,983 |
| LSS CRISIS NURSERY SERVING WRIGHT COUNTY | $10,000 |
| SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL - ST MICHAEL | $10,000 |
| WRIGHT COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION | $10,000 |
| SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES | $10,000 |
| TRUE FRIENDS | $10,000 |
| LOVE INC HEARTLAND | $10,000 |
| ROTARY CLUB OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SUBURBAN HENNEPIN | $10,000 |
| PARK VIEW CARE CENTER | $7,600 |
| ANGEL FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MN | $7,500 |
| WISHES & MORE | $7,500 |
| HOPE CHEST FOR BREAST CANCER | $7,500 |
| COMMUNITY TOYS FOR TOTS | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $306k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- C(CROSS (CHRISTIANS REACHING OUT IN SOCIAL SERVICES)8× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue +189%
- TFTRUE FRIENDS8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +14%
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF HENNEPIN COUNTY7× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- CDCOMMUNITY DENTAL CAREgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +37%
- LRLAKE RIDGE CARE CENTER OF BUFFALO INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +18%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ST CLOUDgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue +55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.
Connectability of mn, inc. works to advance the independence, productivity, and full citizenship of people experiencing physical or invisible barriers.
We empower individuals and families to confidently navigate aging so that it is a purposeful journey filled with dignity and support.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
As followers of christ, hope haven's mission is to empower individuals with disabilities through work and life skills so that they may enjoy a productive life in their community.
Improving access to and the effectiveness of services through facilitation and coordination of community services and provision of information and referral services.
The mission of community shares of minnesota is to create a fair, just and equitable minnesota. community shares of minnesota accomplishes its mission by: supporting collective action to eliminate root causes of inequality and injustice;…
Develop resources and opportunities which empower people and communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners and the most unlike its peers is Can Do Canines. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CROSS (CHRISTIANS REACHING OUT IN SOCIAL SERVICES) ↗
- Who funds TRUE FRIENDS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF HENNEPIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WRIGHT COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds ANGEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WESTERN COMMUNITIES ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE CHEST FOR BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc ↗
- Who funds CAN DO CANINES ↗
- Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds LOVE INC - HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds RIVERWORKS ↗
- Who funds NEXUS-KINDRED FAMILY HEALING ↗
- Who funds WISHES & MORE ↗
- Who funds RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARK VIEW CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds RIVERS OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds Cokato Charitable Trust ↗
- Who funds SECOND CHANCE FOR LIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY DENTAL CARE ↗
- Who funds LAKE RIDGE CARE CENTER OF BUFFALO INC ↗
- Who funds ANNANDALE YOUTH FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ST CLOUD ↗
- Who funds HAVEN HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds SPARE KEY ↗
- Who funds CHOICE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds YOUTH INVESTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Bame Foundation · Edina Realty Foundation · Mardag Foundation · Hunger Solutions Minnesota · Pohlad Family Foundation · Initiative Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wright-Hennepin Electric Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Wright-Hennepin Electric Trust?
Find your warmest path to Wright-Hennepin Electric Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.