Skip to content

Delaware · Private foundation

Wrethinking the Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$629k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
9
Grants FY2024
6
Organizations funded FY2023
33%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$470,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 10
FY2019 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$8.5M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 33% of the organizations Wrethinking the Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 82% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
EducationPublic BenefitSocial ScienceYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving7$629k0%
FY20236$610k33%
FY202210$694k50%
FY20215$1.1M60%
FY20202$750k100%
FY20191$540kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Science & Tech$1.5MCommunity Improvement$1.4MEducation$1.3MSocial Science$100kYouth Development$40kArts & Culture$40kFood & Nutrition$10kHuman Services$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Wrethinking the Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Uc San Diego Foundation$1,255,00050%
Internet Safety Labs$960,000272%
Innovative Engineering Consortium$540,0001n/a
Don Norman Design Award$100,000144%
Illinois Institute of Technology$60,00030%
Girl Scouts San Diego-Imperial Council Inc$40,00040%
Ocean Discovery Institute$30,00030%
San Diego Youth Symphony & Conservatory$30,00030%
Wireless History Foundation$17,50022%
ProduceGood$10,00012%
Del Mar Community Connections Dmcc$10,00021%
Cinequest Inc$10,00011%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($1.3M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Wrethinking the Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 2 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 11 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUc San Diego Foundation: $1,255,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetInternet Safety Labs: $960,000 over 2y, 72% of budgetDon Norman Design Award: $100,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetIllinois Institute of Technology: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGirl Scouts San Diego-Imperial Council Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOcean Discovery Institute: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSan Diego Youth Symphony & Conservatory: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWireless History Foundation: $17,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetProduceGood: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetDel Mar Community Connections Dmcc: $10,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCinequest Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Conrad Prebys FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Wrethinking the Foundation with peer funders

About Wrethinking the Foundation

How much does Wrethinking the Foundation give?
Wrethinking the Foundation reported 9 grants totaling $629,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 10 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.
What does Wrethinking the Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2024, its largest causes are Science & Tech (35%), Community Improvement (31%), Education (29%).
Who are Wrethinking the Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2024: Uc San Diego Foundation ($1.3M), Internet Safety Labs ($960k), Innovative Engineering Consortium ($540k).
Does Wrethinking the Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Wrethinking the Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Wrethinking the Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Conrad Prebys Foundation, Sempra Foundation, The Cushman Foundation.
Where is Wrethinking the Foundation based?
Wrethinking the Foundation is based in DE.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wrethinking the Foundation’s filings →

More from the funding graph