Skip to content

Ohio · Public charity

Worthington Moose Lodge 1427

Worthington Moose Lodge 1427 unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence and charity through a year-round schedule of social, recreational and charitable activities for its members and families.

$430k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
9
Itemized grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
14%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$412k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$32,994
Largest grant, FY2025
$181,468
Organizations funded a year
1 to 9
FY2021 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$4.4M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 14% of the organizations Worthington Moose Lodge 1427 funded were first-time grantees, receiving 8% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving8$412k25%
FY20247$292k14%
FY20239$158k100%
FY20221$36k0%
FY20211$24kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Animals$416kFood & Nutrition$184kHuman Services$125kHousing & Shelter$87kHealth$74kMembership Benefit$24kArts & Culture$6kRecreation & Sports$6k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Worthington Moose Lodge 1427 supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 13 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOhio State Moose Association Museum Inc: $242,003 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetOhio State Moose Assoc: $197,834 over 2y, 25% of budgetChildren's Hunger Alliance: $97,135 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMASH and Resource Center: $86,949 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetGracehaven Inc: $86,949 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetLower Light Ministries Inc: $68,964 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetNationwide Children's Hospital Inc: $34,482 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetLower Lights Christian Health Center: $32,995 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChoices for Victims of Domestic Violence: $32,994 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLutheran Social Services of Central Ohio: $23,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMagical Moments Foundation Inc: $6,310 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetHonor Flight Columbus Inc: $6,310 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWesterville Central Athletic Boosters Club Inc: $6,310 over 1y, 1.6% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH18.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Harry C Moores Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Worthington Moose Lodge 1427 with peer funders

About Worthington Moose Lodge 1427

How much does Worthington Moose Lodge 1427 give?
Worthington Moose Lodge 1427 reported 9 itemized grants totaling $412,427, out of $429,831 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 9 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2024.
What does Worthington Moose Lodge 1427 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Animals (45%), Food & Nutrition (20%), Human Services (14%).
Who are Worthington Moose Lodge 1427's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: Ohio State Moose Association Museum Inc ($242k), Ohio State Moose Assoc ($198k), Children's Hunger Alliance ($97k).
Does Worthington Moose Lodge 1427 fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 14% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Worthington Moose Lodge 1427?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Columbus Foundation, Harry C Moores Foundation, Verizon Foundation.
Where is Worthington Moose Lodge 1427 based?
Worthington Moose Lodge 1427 is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Worthington Moose Lodge 1427’s filings →

More from the funding graph