· Public charity
Worthington Moose Lodge 1427
Worthington Moose Lodge 1427 unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence and charity through a year-round schedule of social, recreational and charitable activities for its members and families.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $412,427 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $429,831 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $17,404 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k8 grants · $231k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $181k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Ohio State Moose Association Museum | $181,468 |
| Lower Light Christian Health | $32,995 |
| Childrens Hunger Alliance | $32,994 |
| Lower Lights Ministries | $32,994 |
| Gracehaven Inc | $32,994 |
| MASH Pantry and Resource Center | $32,994 |
| Choices for Victims of Domestic Vio | $32,994 |
| Nationwide Childrens Hospital | $16,497 |
| Honor Flight Columbus Inc | $16,497 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OSOHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC3× · 2021–2025 · $242k · revenue +541%
- OSOHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOC2× · 2023–2024 · $198k · revenue +26% · 25% of their budget
- CHCHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE3× · 2023–2025 · $97k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- LSLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF CENTRAL OHIOone grant, 2024 · $23k · revenue +17%
- MMMAGICAL MOMENTS FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +53%
- HFHONOR FLIGHT COLUMBUS INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…
Recognizing that we are all created in god's image, the luther home of mercy foundation board's mission is to support the programs and services of luther home of mercy. we are dedicated to helping individuals with intellectual and…
Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
To align community resources and generate insights that strengthen central ohio.
To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…
To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…
To provide elderly or handicapped families and persons on a nonprofit basis, rental housing and related facilities and services.
To provide elderly or handicapped families and persons on a nonprofit basis, rental housing and related facilities and services.
None
The organization provides a comprehensive range of family focused services for lorain county, ohio victims of domestic violence. we endeavor to be a part of collaborative community
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio and the most unlike its peers is Westerville Central Athletic Boosters Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds OHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds MASH and Resource Center ↗
- Who funds GRACEHAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds LOWER LIGHT MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Nationwide Children's Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds LOWER LIGHTS CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHOICES FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF CENTRAL OHIO ↗
- Who funds MAGICAL MOMENTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HONOR FLIGHT COLUMBUS INC ↗
- Who funds WESTERVILLE CENTRAL ATHLETIC BOOSTERS CLUB INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Harry C Moores Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Worthington Moose Lodge 1427 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.