Skip to content

· Public charity

World Help

WORLD HELP is a 501(c)(3) christian humanitarian organization that exists to serve the physical and spiritual needs of people in impoverished communities around the world.

$27M
Granted FY2026still arriving
3
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$658kHuman Services$136kPublic Safety & Disaster$68k
02FY2026 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $65,798, the rows itemized in this filing. The $27,167,194 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $27,101,396 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,045
Median grant
3
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISLEGO MISSIONS$35,753
HILL COUNTRY FELLOWSHIP$20,045
GOD'S PIT CREW$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–26, $156k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HILL COUNTRY FELLOWSHIP: $20k → 6%Dream Center Los Angeles: $136k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $27M on the FY2026 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$16M · 60% · 21 grants

Stated purpose: PROJECT/PROGRAM · PROJECT · PROJECT/PROGRAM/SCHOLARSHIP

Russia and Neighboring States$2.5M · 9% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: PROJECT · PROJECT/PROGRAM · PROGRAM

Middle East and North Africa$2.1M · 8% · 9 grants

Stated purpose: PROJECT/PROGRAM · PROJECT

Central America and the Caribbean$2.1M · 8% · 14 grants

Stated purpose: PROJECT · PROJECT/PROGRAM/SCHOLARSHIP · PROJECT/PROGRAM

South America$1.6M · 6% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: PROJECT · PROJECT/PROGRAM

South Asia$1.5M · 6% · 15 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM/PROJECT/SCHOLARSHIP · PROJECT/PROGRAM · PROJECT

East Asia and the Pacific$900k · 3% · 7 grants

Stated purpose: PROJECT/PROGRAM/SCHOLARSHIP · PROJECT/PROGRAM · PROJECT/SCHOLARSHIP

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$23k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROJECT/PROGRAM

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Victory Life Church International

Church, religious

Religion
2
Our Daily Bread Christian Food Ministry Inc

The purpose of this company is to provide food to homeless and indigent families in our area.

Human Services
3
The Lord's Pantry of Shinnston

Provide food to needy individuals & families - food is puchased from several sources, donated from serveral sources. costs include renting u-haul trucks to picking up truck loads of food from the mountaineer food bank. we also provide…

—
4
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
5
Veritas Foundation

The Foundation's mission is to provide financial, material, and spiritual support to feed the hungry, shelter the poor, clothe the destitute, and bring God's Word to all parts of the World.

Philanthropy
6
Serving With Love Ministry and Food Bank Inc

Food bank ministry

Human Services
7
God Provides Ministry

To provide free food to homeless, veterans, and others

Food & Nutrition
8
Messengers of Hope Mission Inc

mobile food pantry

Food & Nutrition
9
Everything Laid Down Ministries

To give the gospel of Jesus Christ of Nazareth to the poor and dejected of the world. We do this by caring for widows, orphans, and broken people around the world. We care for hem by feeding, clothing, and encouraging them in Jesus by His…

Religion
10
Pin Ministry

Pin ministry exists to connect people experiencing homelessness to a loving god who will heal and restore hope.

Human Services
11
Faith Crusades Ministries Home

Provide housing, food and rehabilitation

Religion
12
Loaves & Fishes the Church Without Walls

Community outreach and church services

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gods Pit Crew Inc; the most unlike its peers is Soonae Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREG LENTZ MINISTRIES: $376,487 · OtherGREG LENTZ MINISTRIESTrinity Baptist Church: $108,130 · OtherTrinity Baptist ChurchSHEPHERD OF THE HILLS-HILLCREST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $70,316 · OtherSHEPHERD OF THE HILLS-HILLCREST CHRISTIAN CHURCHGulf Coast Church: $30,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CHURCH OF MT PLEASANT INC: $26,876 · OtherCHRIST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF SIE RRA MADRE: $25,000 · Other+2 more: $21,531 · OtherDREAM CENTER FOUNDATION: $135,948 · Human ServicesDREAM CENTER FOUNDA…SOONAE FOUNDATION: $20,045 · Human ServicesSOONAE FOUNDATIONGODS PIT CREW INC: $78,052 · Public Safety & DisasterGODS PIT …Islego Missions Inc: $35,753 · Religion
Other$658,340Human Services$155,993Public Safety & Disaster$78,052Religion$35,753

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDREAM CENTER FOUNDATION: $135,948 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGODS PIT CREW INC: $78,052 over 6y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DREAM CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GODS PIT CREW INC ↗
  • Who funds Islego Missions Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOONAE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foster FoundationVA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foster Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization World Help funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from World Help. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on World Help’s filings →

    More from the funding graph