Loading…
· Public charity
World Help
Faith-based humanitarian organization that serves impoverished communities around the world.
$31M
Granted FY2025
9
Grants
4
Communities
$376k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 76% of World Help’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
—
2020
—
2022
—
2023
—
2025
church
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 9 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $314k
- $250k+1 grant · $376k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
- Hearts with Hands$376,487
- Dream Center Los Angeles$135,948
- Trinity Baptist Church$108,130
- Shepherd Church$70,316
- Gulf Coast Church$30,000
- Christ Church Sierra Madre$25,000
- Community Church of Mount Pleasant$20,000
- Sunbury Bible Church$15,380
- The Gathering Church of Asheville$6,151
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $136k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Lord's Pantry of Shinnston
The organization's mission is to help alleviate hunger in west virginia by operating a local food pantry.
—
2
Lubbock Dream Center
The dream center's mission is to bring people from a state of dependency to a place of independency by restoring hope and dignity and to provide with a food pantry.
Human Services
3
Faith Food Pantry
Provide food security to families in lee and monroe counties
Food & Nutrition
4
Loc Food Pantry Inc
LOC Food Pantry Inc. uses God's blessings and servants to feed those in need and provide clothing to those in need and share the Love of Christ. Donations of food and clothing are distributed free of charge to members of the community.
Food & Nutrition
5
Daily Bread Ministries Inc
To provide free food and poverty alleviation training to faith-based organizations seeking to lift people out of poverty.
Food & Nutrition
6
Victory Life Church International
Church, religious
Religion
7
Our Daily Bread Christian Food Ministry Inc
The purpose of this company is to provide food to homeless and indigent families in our area.
Human Services
8
Liberty Ministries
The ministry existes to serve offenders in prison and ex-offenders in the community by showing god's love, providing practical assistance, and supporting biblical standardsof justice.
—
9
Rva Hope Center Inc
Organization provides an outreach ministry serving individuals struggling with homelessness, inner city children and families, as well as survivors of sex trafficking.
Religion
10
Bread of Life Food Pantry Inc
Operate a food pantry in rural west virginia
Food & Nutrition
11
Lumberton Christian Care Center Inc
To provide free meals and temporary shelter for the needy of robeson county.
—
12
Family First Ministries Inc
Providing emergency food boxes and clothing
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agape Center Corporation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Liberty University Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$658,340Human Services$135,948Public Safety & Disaster$68,052
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL9.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation World Help funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: God's Pit Crew.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 541974979 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on God's Pit Crew, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to World Help?
Find your warmest path to World Help through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines