Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Worklife Partnership

To build prosperity for individuals, business, families, and communities by unleashing the potential of front line workers through collaboration with their employers and other resources.

$320k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Employment$1.0MPhilanthropy$180kHuman Services$90kCommunity Improvement$66kEducation$10k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $10,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $319,978 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $309,978 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SAVINGS COLLABORATIVE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $180k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE SAVINGS COLLABORATIVE: $10k → 6%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 12%FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $30k → 12%CINCINNATI WORKS: $100k → 16%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSN: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
IL
MI
OH
CO
VA
LA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Nonprofit Association

Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.

Community Improvement
2
Goodwill Industries of North Central Wisconsin Inc

Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.

Human Services
3
Colorado Women's Employment & Education Inc

Cwee fosters personal and professional transformation for low-income families through confidence building, customized skills training, and career advancement.

Employment
4
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
5
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
6
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
7
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
8
Colorado Fiscal Institute

To provide timely, credible and accessible analyses of fiscal and economic issues facing colorado to inform public policy debates and promote economic prosperity

Community Improvement
9
Social Venture Partners Boulder County Inc

To harness the collective power of nonprofits and philanthropic changemakers to accelerate community impact.

Philanthropy
10
Goodwill Industries of Denver

Goodwill's mission is to provide education, career development, and employment opportunities to help coloradans in need achieve self-sufficiency, dignity, and hope through the power of work.

11
Colorado Jobs With Justice Inc

Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families

Employment
12
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Colorado Nonprofit Development Center and the most unlike its peers is Oai Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WORKING METRICS — $600,000 · OtherWORKING METRICS+1 more — $10,000 · OtherOAI Inc — $100,000 · EmploymentOAI IncGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER DETROIT — $100,000 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GR…CARES OF WASHINGTON — $53,000 · EmploymentCARES OF WASHINGTONSOUTHWEST ORGANIZATIONS UNIFYING RESOURCES FOR OUR COMMUNITY AND EMPLOYEE — $53,000 · EmploymentSOUTHWEST ORGANIZATIONS U…CINCINNATI WORKS — $100,000 · Human ServicesCINCINNATI WORK…FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $30,000 · Human ServicesFOCUS POINTS FA…SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesSISTER CARMEN C…EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY FAMIL…The Savings Collaborative — $10,000 · Human ServicesThe Savings Col…THE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER NEW…IMPACT CHARITABLE — $60,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACT CHARITAB…UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VERMONT INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF N…THE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $36,000 · Community ImprovementMOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER — $30,000 · Community ImprovementExecutives Partnering to Invest in Children (EPIC) — $10,000 · Education
Other$610,000Employment$306,000Human Services$180,000Philanthropy$180,000Community Improvement$66,000Education$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOAI Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER DETROIT — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetIMPACT CHARITABLE — $60,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetCARES OF WASHINGTON — $53,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST ORGANIZATIONS UNIFYING RESOURCES FOR OUR COMMUNITY AND EMPLOYEE — $53,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $36,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $30,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER — $30,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VERMONT INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Savings Collaborative — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetExecutives Partnering to Invest in Children (EPIC) — $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetCOLORADO AFRICAN ORGANIZATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rose Community FoundationCO15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Worklife Partnership funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 34%
  • United Way of Northwest Vermont Inc34% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph