Skip to content
Workforce Professionals Training Institute at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Workforce Professionals Training Institute

Wpti's mission is to build the capacities of people, programs, and organizations that provide job training, placement, and career guidance for individuals and to advocate for policies that promote economic opportunities for all.

$115k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$599kHealth$47kInternational$11kArts & Culture$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$810k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC GUARDIAN SERVICES$11,000
FORESTDALE INC$11,000
GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES$11,000
CHILDRENS' AID SOCIETY$11,000
JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK$11,000
THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE$10,000
THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING$10,000
HEARTSHARE ST VINCENT'S SERVICES$10,000
RISING GROUND$10,000
SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES$10,000
GRAHAM WINDHAM$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $522k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SCO: $10k → 6%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $10k → 9%FORESTDALE INC: $11k → 13%THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $10k → 17%SCO: $10k → 6%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $10k → 9%FORESTDALE INC: $10k → 13%THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $10k → 17%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $10k → 28%SCO: $10k → 6%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $10k → 9%FORESTDALE INC: $10k → 13%THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $10k → 17%SCO: $10k → 6%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $10k → 9%FORESTDALE INC: $10k → 13%THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $10k → 17%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $10k → 9%FORESTDALE INC: $10k → 13%THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $10k → 17%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $8k → 9%FORESTDALE INC: $8k → 13%SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $10k → 20%RISING GROUND: $10k → 17%JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $11k → 20%HEARTSHARE ST VINCENT'S SERVICES: $10k → 20%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $10k → 20%RISING GROUND: $10k → 20%HEARTSHARE HUMAN SERVICES OF NEW YORK: $10k → 20%CHILDRENS' AID SOCIETY: $11k → 17%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $10k → 20%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $11k → 17%HEARTSHARE HUMAN SERVICES OF NEW YORK: $10k → 20%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $10k → 17%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $10k → 20%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $10k → 17%RISING GROUND: $10k → 20%HEARTSHARE HUMAN SERVICES OF NEW YORK: $10k → 20%RISING GROUND: $10k → 20%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $10k → 17%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $10k → 20%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $10k → 17%RISING GROUND: $10k → 20%HEARTSHARE HUMAN SERVICES OF NEW YORK: $10k → 20%CHILDRENS' AID: $10k → 17%CHILDRENS' AID: $10k → 17%CHILDRENS' AID: $10k → 17%CHILDRENS' AID: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 86% of Workforce Professionals Training Institute’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 14%.

Workforce Professionals Training Institutelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$627k · 12 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$627k
$15k

Still filing today

92%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $58k · revenue +88%
  • FI
    FORESTDALE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $58k · revenue +108%
  • CG
    CATHOLIC GUARDIAN SERVICES
    6× · 2019–2024 · $58k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • S
    SCO
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • J
    JCAA
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cardinal Mccloskey School and Home for Children

The organization strives to protect, empower and promote independence for at-risk children and families and those with developmental disabilities through quality community based services.

—
2
Children's Home of Poughkeepsie Inc

The children's home of poughkeepsie is one of the oldest child welfare agencies in the nation. on january 21, 1847, a group of poughkeepsie women met to form the female guardian society to care for the poor, abandoned and neglected in…

Human Services
3
Under 21

Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…

Human Services
4
Nysarc Inc New York City Chapter

We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.

Human Services
5
Northside Center for Child Development Inc

To foster the healthy development of children and families and seek to empower them to respond constructively to negative societal factors including racism and its related consequences. through comprehensive, high quality mental health and…

Education
6
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services Inc

Cases' mission is to increase public safety through innovative services that reduce crime and incarceration, improve behavioral health, promote recovery and rehabilitation, and create opportunities for success in the community. we believe…

—
7
Family Services of Westchester Inc

Family services of westchester offers a broad range of social and mental health services to strengthen and support families, children and individuals at every stages of the life cycle from infancy to adulthood.

—
8
Children's Friend and Service

The mission of children's friend and service (the organization) is to be the innovative leader in improving the well-being and healthy development of rhode island's most vulnerable young children. they accomplish this by providing flexible…

Human Services
9
Center for Developmental Disabilities

The center's mission is to help children and adults with differing abilities achieve their dreams by overcoming barriers to living, working, learning & enjoying recreational opportunities in the community of their choice.

Human Services
10
Julia Dyckman Andrus Memorial Inc

Through our proven care models, innovative programs, professional training, influential research and determined advocacy, andrus aims to be a national leader in shaping policies and practices that prevent and overcome the effect of…

Unclassified
11
Preferred Behavioral Health of Nj Inc

To deliver quality and compassionate behavioral health services to individuals and families all the time through a trauma informed care philosophy and approach.

Health
12
The Center for Discovery Inc

The center for discovery offers individuals with a range of disabilities and medical frailties - and their families - innovative educational, clinical, residential, social and creative arts experiences designed to enrich their lives…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Village Inc; the most unlike its peers is Candid. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $58,325 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETYGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $58,325 · Human ServicesGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICESFORESTDALE INC: $58,325 · Human ServicesFORESTDALE INCRISING GROUND INC: $57,325 · Human ServicesRISING GROUND INCNEW YORK FOUNDLING: $57,325 · Human ServicesNEW YORK FOUNDLINGGRAHAM WINDHAM: $57,325 · Human ServicesGRAHAM WINDHAMSCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $49,625 · Human ServicesSCO FAMILY OF SERVICESHEARTSHARE HUMAN SERVICES OF NEW YORK: $47,325 · Human ServicesHEARTSHARE HUMAN SERVICES OF NEW YORKTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $47,325 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC+3 more: $31,000 · Human Services+3 moreCATHOLIC GUARDIAN SERVICES: $58,325 · OtherCATHOLIC GUARDIAN …SHELTERING ARMS CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $37,325 · OtherSHELTERING ARMS CH…SCO: $7,700 · OtherSCOJCAA: $7,700 · OtherJCAACANDID: $39,625 · Philanthropy
Human Services$522,225Other$111,050Philanthropy$39,625

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $58,325 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $58,325 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFORESTDALE INC: $58,325 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC GUARDIAN SERVICES: $58,325 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRISING GROUND INC: $57,325 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDLING: $57,325 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGRAHAM WINDHAM: $57,325 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $49,625 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTSHARE HUMAN SERVICES OF NEW YORK: $47,325 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $47,325 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCANDID: $39,625 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERING ARMS CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $37,325 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FORESTDALE INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC GUARDIAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds RISING GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDLING ↗
  • Who funds GRAHAM WINDHAM ↗
  • Who funds SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HEARTSHARE HUMAN SERVICES OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CANDID ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERING ARMS CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hearts to Homes Furni…Dave Thomas Foundatio…Mother Cabrini Health…Pinkerton FoundationRobin Hood FoundationGood Plus Foundation …The Hyde and Watson F…Mutual of America Fou…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…The Blackbaud Giving …
Hearts to Homes Furnishings IncNY17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hearts to Homes Furnishings Inc · Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Pinkerton Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Good Plus Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Mutual of America Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Workforce Professionals Training Institute funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Workforce Professionals Training Institute. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Workforce Professionals Training Institute?

    Find your warmest path to Workforce Professionals Training Institute through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Workforce Professionals Training Institute’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home