Loading…
· Public charity
Hearts to Homes Furnishings Inc
At hearts to homes, our core mission is to empower individuals aging out of foster care by transforming empty living spaces into a place they can call home.
$173k
Granted FY2020
6
Grants
1
Communities
$51k
Largest
01What you fund
01beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
household furniture
2021
sheltering armschildrensaint dominic'sidentifiesspecialskillsevery
2022
sheltering armsnaficonsultationchildrenidentifiessaint dominic'sften
2023
naficonsultationidentifieschildrenrocklandcardinal mccloskeyften
2024
jewish boardlargestchildrensaint dominic'sidentifiesprofessionallive
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
02FY2020 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- $10k–50k5 grants · $91k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$18,198
Median grant
1
States reached
$335k
Total assets
Largest grants
- Catholic Guardian Services$50,719
- Rising Ground$31,639
- MercyFirst$18,198
- The Children's Village$17,707
- JCCA$11,817
- Graham Windham$11,404
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 9%. 60% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Families Together in New York
Establish a unified voice for children and youth with emotional, behavioral, and social challenges. the organizational mission is to ensure that every family has access to needed information, support and services.
Human Services
2
Jewish Family and Children's Service
To support people of all backgrounds to reach their full potential.
Human Services
3
1199SEIUGREATER New York Child Care
To establish child care youth programs and related services for fund eligible 1199 members in order to increase their access to high quality, affordable child care and youth related services and information. to assist parents reconciling…
Membership Benefit
4
Family & Children Services Inc
Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive program of critical human services.
Human Services
5
United Children's Services of
Children's services
Human Services
6
Alternatives for Children
To provide quality programs for young children with special needs.
—
7
Klingberg Comprehensive Family
To provide in-home and community-based professional services as well as therapeutic counseling to children and families with the intent of preventing out-of-home placement of abused and neglected children
—
8
Family and Children's Service Inc
Family and children's service provides compassionate care, intervention and education to support people during challenging times in their lives
Human Services
9
Child Care Council of Westchester Inc
Westchester County's leading authority on child care, the Child Care Council of Westchester, Inc. is one of the largest child care resource and referral agencies in the state of New York. A nonprofit, 501(c)(3) agency, the Council plays a…
Human Services
10
Childnet Youth & Family Services
To provide safe homes, education and counseling to vulnerable children and families.
Human Services
11
Family Health Network of Central
Family health network of central new york, inc. operates free standing diagnostic and treatment centers, licensed under article 28 of new york state law, located in the counties of cortland and cayuga. the family health network of central…
Health
12
Jewish Family and Children's Service
Provide behavioral health and social services to children, families and adults of all ages.
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundling and the most unlike its peers is Jewish Board of Family & Children's. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 77 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
7%
2/29
the rest of the field
9%
5,622/59,753
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
04the grantee network
27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2018–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/27
Grantees still filing
22/27
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$90,765Other$50,719
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Dave Thomas Foundation for AdoptionOH35.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption · Robin Hood Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Workforce Professionals Training · The New York Community Trust · Pinkerton Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · New Yorkers for Children Inc · Good Plus Foundation Inc · United Way of Westchester and Putnam
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Hearts to Homes Furnishings Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Catholic Guardian Services.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~0 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 135562186 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Catholic Guardian Services, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Hearts to Homes Furnishings Inc?
Find your warmest path to Hearts to Homes Furnishings Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines