· Private foundation
Woodside Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Travis Mills Foundation | $2,500 |
| Good Shepherd Food Bank | $2,500 |
| Portland Community Squash | $2,500 |
| Freeport Community Services | $2,500 |
| Cradles to Crayons Inc | $2,250 |
| Maine Right to Life Committee Educational Fund | $2,250 |
| Steamboat Springs Winter Sports Club Inc | $2,000 |
| The Center for Grieving Children | $2,000 |
| Freeport Conservation Trust | $1,500 |
| Waldo Community Action Partners | $1,000 |
| Best Buddies International Inc | $1,000 |
| Genius Recovery Foundation Inc | $1,000 |
| Capital Area New Mainers Project | $1,000 |
| UBR (fka Unity Barn Raisers) | $1,000 |
| Immigrant Legal Advocacy Project | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
47 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPortland Community Squash6× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +74%
TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +128%- SSSTEAMBOAT SPRINGS WINTER SPORTS CLUB INC6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +62%
Funded once
- SSSEE SCIENCE CENTER INCone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
- SHSTEAMBOAT HEALTH & RECREATION ASSOCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +75%
- WAWATERFALL ARTSone grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue -31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Maine Rivers is a statewide advocacy organization. Our mission is to protect, restore and enhance the ecological health of Maine's river systems. We support and direct efforts to conserve and improve the health of Maine's rivers and…
The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.
The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…
Maine Historical Society, founded in 1822, is a private non-profit whose mission is to preserve and share Maine's story. Based in Portland, we work closely with communities and partners throughout the state, and serve a statewide and…
To conserve lands with significant ecological or cultural resources and manage them in a sustainable way for public benefit.
To illuminate and advance greater understanding of and support for Wabanaki Nations' heritage, living cultures, and homelands.
To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.
Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.
Maine Media Workshops & College educates and inspires visual artists and storytellers to achieve their creative potential. We provide lifelong learning opportunities for those pursuing the fine arts and media-related professions. We are…
The mission of the 30 Mile River Watershed Association (30 Mile) is to work as a community for clean and healthy lakes, ponds and streams in our watershed. Since 2008, 30 Mile has led efforts to protect these waters from the growing…
We conserve land permanently to benefit the natural and human communities of western the Penobscot Bay region.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Grieving Children and the most unlike its peers is Italian Greyhound Rescue Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Portland Community Squash ↗
- Who funds TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE OF PERU PROJECT ↗
- Who funds STEAMBOAT SPRINGS WINTER SPORTS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds The Washington-Waldorf School Inc ↗
- Who funds MAINE ORGANIC FARMERS AND GARDENERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Cornerspring Montessori School ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SEE SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds STEAMBOAT HEALTH & RECREATION ASSOC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds FREEPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Good Shepherd Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust ↗
- Who funds Freeport Conservation Trust ↗
- Who funds Maine Farmland Trust ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WATERFALL ARTS ↗
- Who funds HIPPOCRATES HEALTH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL REFUGE LEAGUE OF GREATER PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds WALDO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds PROPRIETORS OF THE BOSTON ATHENAEUM ↗
- Who funds UBR ↗
- Who funds Small Woodland Owners Association of Maine ↗
- Who funds MAINE RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE EDUCTIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
- Who funds GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
- Who funds MAINE STATE SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
- Who funds MOOSEHEAD HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Maine Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds UNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds Maine Needs Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Onion Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Sam L Cohen Foundation · John T Gorman Foundation · Simmons Foundation - PerkinsThompson · Saco & Biddeford Savings Charitable Foundation · Vincent B and Barbara G Welch Supporting Organization · Maine Health Access Foundation Inc · Lennox Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Woodside Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Proprietors of the Boston Athenaeum — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.