Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Woods Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$468k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$118k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Public Benefit$150kYouth Development$143kPhilanthropy$100kHuman Services$80kArts & Culture$61kEducation$57kReligion$51kHealth$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $328k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Girls Inc San Antonio$117,643
JEWISH SENIOR CITIZENS OF SAN ANTONIO$110,000
ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION$50,000
FREDERICKSBURG BIBLE CHURCH$50,000
CHILDREN'S SHELTER$30,000
UT HEALTH SAN ANTONIO$25,000
OUR DAILY BREAD$20,000
GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER$20,000
THRU PROJECT$10,000
Blood and Tissue Foundation$10,000
ISRAEL AM$10,000
HERITAGE FOUNDATION$10,000
1 W 54TH ST FOUNDATION$5,000
UTSA$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $193k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $30k → 16%THE CHILDRENS SHELTER: $15k → 16%Girls Inc San Antonio: $118k → 16%Girls Inc San Antonio: $25k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$444k · 8 repeat orgs$189k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$444k
$74k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+18%

Still filing today

38%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO
    2× · 2022–2024 · $143k · revenue -4%
  • JS
    JEWISH SENIOR CITIZENS OF SAN ANTONIO
    2× · 2023–2024 · $115k
  • AN
    ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $60k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • TS
    Texas State University
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • LL
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY OF TX
    one grant, 2021 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Metropolitan Ministries Inc

Provides short term shelter, housing and other services for the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless in bexar county.

2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
4
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
5
San Antonio Christian School

Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…

6
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
7
Austin Street Center

The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…

8
San Antonio Report

Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.

Arts & Culture
9
She Is Safe Inc

She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…

International
10
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
11
San Antonio Area Foundation

To serve as your most trusted and impactful philanthropic partner.

Philanthropy
12
The Montessori School of San Antonio

The montessori school of san antonio (mssa) guides children to be passionate learners, independent thinkers, and engaged citizens. through the guiding principles of montessori curriculum and the school culture, children develop critical…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Our Daily Bread Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH SENIOR CITIZENS OF SAN ANTONIO — $115,000 · OtherJEWISH SENIOR CITIZENS OF SAN ANTONIOFREDERICKSBURG BIBLE CHURCH — $50,000 · OtherFREDERICKSBURG BIBLE CHURCHTHE UNIV OF TX HEALTH SCIENCE CTR OF SA — $30,000 · OtherTHE UNIV OF TX HEALTH SCIENCE CTR OF SAHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $25,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYTexas State University — $25,000 · OtherTexas State UniversityHillsdale College — $20,000 · OtherHillsdale CollegeBlood and Tissue Foundation — $20,000 · OtherBlood and Tissue FoundationGOOD SAMARITAN CENTER — $20,000 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN CENTERLEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY OF TX — $15,000 · Other+7 more — $19,200 · Other+7 moreGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO — $142,643 · Human ServicesGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANT…THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER — $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO — $100,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATI…ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION — $60,000 · Arts & CultureADMIRAL N…OUR DAILY BREAD INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionTHRU PROJECT — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Public BenefitRBC MINISTRIES — $1,000 · Religion
Other$339,200Human Services$192,643Philanthropy$100,000Arts & Culture$60,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Youth Development$10,000Public Benefit$10,000Religion$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO — $142,643 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO — $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER — $45,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOUR DAILY BREAD INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHRU PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRespite Care of San Antonio Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRBC MINISTRIES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ART — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO
  • Who funds ADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER
  • Who funds OUR DAILY BREAD INC
  • Who funds THRU PROJECT
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Respite Care of San Antonio Inc
  • Who funds RBC MINISTRIES
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ART

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Nustar Foundation · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Woods Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Woods Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Woods Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph