Skip to content

Florida · Private foundation

Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2025
2
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$50,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 10
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$776k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18) funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving2$55k0%
FY20242$61k0%
FY202310$52k60%
FY20228$67k38%
FY20216$33k17%
FY202010$56k60%
FY20197$39kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$117kHealth$87kEducation$45kEnvironment$27kRecreation & Sports$10kYouth Development$9kAnimals$7kCommunity Improvement$3kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 14 grantees
All grantees of Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18) by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Salvador Dali Museum Inc$102,50030%
St Petersburg Historical Society$43,00042%
Academy Prep Center of St Petersburg$36,50051%
Tampa Bay Watch Inc$25,00020%
Gulfport Historical Society$9,5001n/a
Shorecrest Preparatory School Inc$8,00030%
Infinite Potential Learning Academy Inc$5,0001n/a
National Society Daughters of the American Revolution$5,00010%
St Petersburg Audubon Society Inc$4,00037%
Birds in Helping Hands$3,0001n/a
The Rotary Club of St Petersburg Inc$2,50023%
Save Crystal River Inc$2,00010%
First Baptist Church of St Petersburg$1,5001n/a
The American Stage Company Inc$1,40010%

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($114k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18) supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSalvador Dali Museum Inc: $102,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSt Petersburg Historical Society: $43,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetAcademy Prep Center of St Petersburg: $36,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTampa Bay Watch Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetShorecrest Preparatory School Inc: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNational Society Daughters of the American Revolution: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Petersburg Audubon Society Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetThe Rotary Club of St Petersburg Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetSave Crystal River Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Stage Company Inc: $1,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Margaret and David Perry Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18)FL24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Margaret and David Perry Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18) · Duke Energy Foundation · Francis and Gertrude Levett Foundation · Raymund Foundation Inc · Pinellas Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Hough Family Foundation Inc · Life's Requite Inc · Milkey Family Foundation Inc · Westphal Family Foundation Inc · J Crayton Pruitt Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18) with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18)?

Find your warmest path to Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18)

How much does Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18) give?
Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18) reported 2 grants totaling $55,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 10 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18) fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (38%), Health (28%), Education (14%).
Who are Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18)'s largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: Salvador Dali Museum Inc ($103k), St Petersburg Historical Society ($43k), Academy Prep Center of St Petersburg ($37k).
Does Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18) fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18) accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18)?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Margaret and David Perry Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18), Duke Energy Foundation, Francis and Gertrude Levett Foundation.
Where is Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18) based?
Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18) is based in FL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Woodnote Foundation (T/U/A 2/14/18)’s filings →

More from the funding graph