Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Woodlawn United Inc

The foundation will serve as a catalyst and facilitator for the transformation and revitalization of the woodlawn community in birmingham, alabama into a vibrant and sustainable community in which its residents have an opportunity to thrive.

$95k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$2.0MCommunity Improvement$68kCrime & Legal$60kHealth$37kHuman Services$25kYouth Development$18kPhilanthropy$16kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $74,600 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $95,300 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,700 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$74,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
I3 ACADEMY - CONSTRUCTION EXPENSES$74,600
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHRISTIAN SERVICE MISSION: $15k → 16%GIRLS ON THE RUN: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 8 repeat orgs$159k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$2.1M
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+38%

Still filing today

88%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IA
    I3 ACADEMY
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue ×71
  • CH
    Christ Health Center Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $37k · revenue +60%
  • OH
    OPERATION HOPE INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $34k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEFFERSON CO DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
  • CS
    Christian Service Mission Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +19%
  • IA
    IGNITE ALABAMAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Birmingham Foundation
2
Birmingham Promise Inc

Birmingham Promise supports and prepares every Birmingham City School student in achieving economic security, mobility, and prosperity by providing connections to high-quality work experiences and last-dollar tuition scholarships

Education
3
Urban Impact Inc

Our mission is to develop, implement and drive creative community-based strategies and programs that enhance economic opportunity, builds inclusive and equitable ecosystems, facilitates historic preservation, and ensures a dynamic,…

Philanthropy
4
Breakthrough Birmingham

Breakthrough Birmingham works with highly motivated, traditionally underrepresented students in Alabama to achieve post-secondary success while empowering aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educators and advocates.

Education
5
Build Up

Empower youth to step out of generational poverty and tackle urban blight by earning the education, workforce skills, and multi-family homeownership to collectively lead long-term community revitalization.

Youth Development
6
Greater Birmingham Ministries

To serve people, build community, pursue justice.

7
Create Birmingham

To support workforce development, entrepreneurial ventures and job growth in non-profit and commercial creative industries.

Philanthropy
8
Momentum Alumnae Program Inc

To be alabama's premier women's leadership program which empowers a diverse group of promising women to develop leadership skills that positively impact business, culture, and politics in alabama.

Education
9
Bama Builds (formerly Bama Works Fund)

Beginning of Year- Serve as a Scholarship Granting Organization for low-to-moderate income children in the state of Alabama. However, the program went dormant during the 2022-2023 school year. We are now repurposing the program to serve…

Education
10
Flourish Alabama

The Flourish Alabama is a nonprofit organization dedicated to planting the seeds to help young artists bloom. We create and facilitate multi-medium programming and curriculum geared towards helping youth create collaborative art projects…

Arts & Culture
11
Urban Impact

Urban Impact cultivates thriving communities, by creating access, opportunity, and lasting change. Our vision is that all people and every neighborhood are rooted and thriving in community.

Religion
12
Peoples Budget Birmingham

Our mission is to empower people across Birmingham through community education and organizing, ensuring neighborhoods have direct and democratic control over local resources and municipal spending while holding our government accountable…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birmingham Education Foundation and the most unlike its peers is James Rushton I Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

I3 ACADEMY — $1,142,540 · EducationI3 ACADEMYJames Rushton I Foundation — $181,680 · EducationJames Rushton I Foundation+2 more — $15,000 · EducationBIRMINGHAM BOARD OF EDUCATION — $618,000 · OtherBIRMINGHAM BOARD OF EDUCATIONJEFFERSON CO DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE — $60,000 · OtherJEFFERSON CO DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICEOPERATION HOPE INC — $34,175 · OtherDESERT ISLAND SUPPLY CO — $30,000 · Other+3 more — $35,000 · OtherChrist Health Center Inc — $36,783 · HealthIGNITE ALABAMA — $15,000 · Community ImprovementCommunity Care Development Network — $10,000 · Community ImprovementChristian Service Mission Inc — $15,000 · Human ServicesGirls on the Run Birmingham — $7,500 · Human ServicesREV BIRMINGHAM INC — $19,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC — $11,250 · PhilanthropyEmily Bayless Graham Charitable Trust Courtney McGrath Spangler & T McGrath — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Education$1,339,220Other$777,175Health$36,783Community Improvement$25,000Human Services$22,500Arts & Culture$19,000Philanthropy$16,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetI3 ACADEMY — $1,142,540 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetJames Rushton I Foundation — $181,680 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetChrist Health Center Inc — $36,783 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION HOPE INC — $34,175 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT ISLAND SUPPLY CO — $30,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetREV BIRMINGHAM INC — $19,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetChristian Service Mission Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJONES VALLEY URBAN FARM — $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetIGNITE ALABAMA — $15,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC — $11,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Care Development Network — $10,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF BIRMING — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGirls on the Run Birmingham — $7,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetBIRMINGHAM EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEmily Bayless Graham Charitable Trust Courtney McGrath Spangler & T McGrath — $5,000 over 1y, 19% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Greater BirminghamAL29.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · Campbell Estelle S Char Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Protective Life Foundation · The Hugh Kaul Foundation · The Joseph S Bruno Charitable Foundation · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Orlean & Ralph W Beeson Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Woodlawn United Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph