Skip to content
Woodland Park Zoological Society at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Woodland Park Zoological Society

Woodland park zoo saves wildlife and inspires everyone to make conservation a priority in their lives.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$5.1MEnvironment$98kArts & Culture$68k
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $1,010,390, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,458,424 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $448,034 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $986k
$60,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$102M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$120,000
INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION$119,941
THE SEATTLE AQUARIUM$98,311
MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION$80,000
ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE COUNTY$75,000
ARROWHEAD ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$73,452
NORTHWEST TREK WILDLIFE PARK$60,000
GRIZZLY AND WOLF DISCOVERY$60,000
RACINE ZOO$60,000
POINT DEFIANCE ZOO & AQUARIUM$60,000
DAKOTA ZOOLOGICAL SOCETY$60,000
TAUTPHAUS PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$59,894
COMO FRIENDS$59,242
ZOO MONTANA$15,000
HENRY VILAS ZOO EDUCATION$9,550
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 43% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%IDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $317k → 8%MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION: $80k → 6%COMO ZOO: $240k → 14%ARROWHEAD ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $190k → 15%ZOO MONTANA: $67k → 9%GRIZZLY AND WOLF DISCOVERY CENTER: $134k → 10%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $28k → 28%INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION: $221k → 9%RACINE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $160k → 10%HENRY VILAS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $162k → 10%ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE COUNTY: $224k → 17%SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $104k → 9%NORTHWEST TREK WILDLIFE PARK: $60k → 9%ALASKA SEALIFE CENTER: $50k → 11%GREATER MINOT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $49k → 10%DAKOTA ZOOLOGICAL SOCETY: $60k → 10%RED RIVER ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $57k → 12%IDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $120k → 8%MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION: $57k → 6%COMO FRIENDS: $136k → 14%ARROWHEAD ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $166k → 15%GRIZZLY AND WOLF DISCOVERY: $60k → 10%PANTHERA: $100k → 17%INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION: $120k → 9%RACINE ZOO: $95k → 10%HENRY VILAS ZOO EDUCATION: $88k → 10%ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE COUNTY: $82k → 17%THE SEATTLE AQUARIUM: $98k → 9%NORTHWEST TREK WILDLIFE PARK: $50k → 9%DAKOTA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $56k → 10%ZOO BOISE: $49k → 8%MINNESOTA ZOO: $50k → 6%COMO FRIENDS: $59k → 14%ARROWHEAD ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $73k → 15%GRIZZLY AND WOLF DISCOVERY CENTER: $123k → 10%PANTHERA: $100k → 17%INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION: $29k → 9%RACINE ZOO: $60k → 10%ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE COUNTY: $75k → 17%SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $33k → 9%IDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $39k → 8%LAKE SUPERIOR ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $51k → 15%ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE COUNTY: $29k → 17%SNOW LEOPARD TRUST: $30k → 9%ZOO SOCIETY: $176k → 9%SNOW LEOPARD TRUST: $30k → 9%POINT DEFIANCE ZOO & AQUARIUM: $80k → 9%POINT DEFIANCE ZOO & AQUARIUM: $60k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
WI
NY
MA
MO
MD
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $404k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$290k · 72% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Sub-Saharan Africa$62k · 15% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Russia and Neighboring States$25k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION PROGRAM

South America$17k · 4% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION PROGRAM

South Asia$10k · 2% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CONSERVATION PROGRAM

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 23 repeat orgs$257k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
9

Total granted

$5.0M
$257k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+34%

Still filing today

91%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IZ
    IDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $526k · revenue +100%
  • AZ
    ARROWHEAD ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $494k · revenue +81%
  • CF
    COMO FRIENDS
    3× · 2021–2024 · $435k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • NZ
    NEW ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $57k · revenue -16%
  • RR
    RED RIVER ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2022 · $57k · revenue +7%
  • SA
    SEWARD ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MARINE SCIENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oak Creek Zoological Conservatory
Animals
2
Zoo Outreach Organisation

Wildlife conservation, research and education.

Environment
3
Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals
4
Zoological Society of Milwaukee Cty

The mission of the zoological society is to conserve wildlife and endangered species, to educate people about the importance of wildlife and the environment, and to support the milwaukee county zoo.

Animals
5
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
6
Alaska Zoo

To promote the conservation of arctic, sub-arctic and like-climate species through education, research and community enrichment. the zoo provides rehabilitation and shelter for injured and abandoned animals. the facility is open to the…

Animals
7
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
8
Zoological Society of Milwaukee Endowment Trust

To provide support & funding for the mission of the zoological society of milwaukee & the milwaukee county zoo.

Animals
9
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
10
Friends of the Zoo of Springfield Mo Inc

Support the operation of the dickerson park zoo including caring for animals, constructing new exhibits and providing fun, meaningful education experiences.

Animals
11
San Francisco Zoological Society

To connect all people with wildlife, inspire caring for nature, and advance conservation action.

Animals
12
North Carolina Zoological Society Inc

To champion our zoo and its initiatives, wildlife and wild places, with an emphasis on the future.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idaho Zoological Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cultural Access Washington. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
20/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $525,542 · AnimalsIDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INCARROWHEAD ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $494,102 · AnimalsARROWHEAD ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYCOMO FRIENDS: $434,848 · AnimalsCOMO FRIENDSINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $409,759 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INCZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE CTY: $409,599 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE CTYPOINT DEFIANCE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $316,601 · AnimalsPOINT DEFIANCE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYGRIZZLY DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $316,600 · AnimalsGRIZZLY DISCOVERY CENTER INCRACINE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $315,328 · AnimalsRACINE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INCTautphaus Park Zoological SocietyInc: $265,320 · AnimalsTautphaus Park Zoological SocietyIncTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $234,898 · AnimalsPANTHERA CORPORATION: $200,000 · AnimalsMINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION: $186,410 · Animals+13 more: $741,605 · Animals+13 moreGREATER MADISON CONSERVATION SOCIETY INC: $279,081 · OtherWASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE: $30,000 · OtherLION COUNTRY SAFARI: $17,512 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $15,000 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOO KEEPERS: $15,000 · OtherCultural Access Washington: $67,958 · Arts & CultureAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $10,000 · Education
Animals$4,850,612Other$356,593Arts & Culture$67,958Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $525,542 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetARROWHEAD ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $494,102 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetCOMO FRIENDS: $434,848 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $409,759 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE CTY: $409,599 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetPOINT DEFIANCE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $316,601 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetGRIZZLY DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $316,600 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetRACINE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $315,328 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetTautphaus Park Zoological SocietyInc: $265,320 over 3y, 19% of budgetTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $234,898 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION: $186,410 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetNORTHWEST TREK FOUNDATION: $116,208 over 3y, 30% of budgetDAKOTA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $115,600 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetZooMontana Inc: $89,540 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetGREATER MINOT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $61,868 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SNOW LEOPARD TRUST: $59,950 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNEW ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $56,600 over 1y, 11% of budgetRED RIVER ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $56,600 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $54,305 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEWARD ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MARINE SCIENCE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGunung Palung Orangutan Conservation Program Inc: $24,967 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetREWILD: $21,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOOLOGICAL PARKS AND AQUARIUMS INC: $14,967 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Association …Mightycause Charitabl…Baird Foundation IncAmerican Endowment Fo…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for Good
American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums IncMD17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Woodland Park Zoological Society funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Woodland Park Zoological Society. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 27%
  • Gunung Palung Orangutan Conservation Program Inc: 27% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Woodland Park Zoological Society’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home