Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Woodford Manufacturing Charities Inc

To collect contributions from woodford manufacturing company and employees, and to distribute all contributions to selected local tax-exempt charities that can be characterized in three distinct groups: basic needs, self-sufficiency, and child development.

$705k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Human Services$1.5MHousing & Shelter$644kHealth$470kFood & Nutrition$291kYouth Development$209kEducation$137kCrime & Legal$95k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $410k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $295k
$35,891
Median grant
1
States reached
$9k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TESSA$71,498
TRI-LAKES CARES$59,681
GRECCIO$55,365
SPECIAL KIDSSPECIAL FAMILIES$55,216
HOPE & HOME$53,504
SARAH'S HOME$46,735
MARIAN HOUSE KITCHEN$41,507
FAMILY LIFE SERVICES$37,785
THE PLACE$35,891
CHRISTMAS UNLIMITED$34,054
ARC OF PIKES PEAK$33,934
MT CARMEL VETERANS$29,703
CARE & SHARE$28,847
SALVATION ARMY$28,122
PARENTS CHALLENGE$27,321
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%The Place: $36k → 9%THE PLACE: $36k → 9%The Place: $34k → 9%Springs Rescue Mission: $28k → 9%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $24k → 9%Springs Rescue Mission: $22k → 9%Springs Rescue Mission: $14k → 9%The Place: $14k → 9%The Place: $13k → 9%Springs Rescue Mission: $10k → 9%Hope & Home: $61k → 9%Hope & Home: $59k → 9%Hope & Home: $57k → 9%HOPE & HOME: $54k → 9%Hope & Home: $53k → 9%CHRISTMAS UNLIMITED: $34k → 9%Christmas Unlimited: $33k → 9%Christmas Unlimited: $32k → 9%Christmas Unlimited: $31k → 9%Christmas Unlimited: $30k → 9%TESSA: $75k → 9%TESSA: $73k → 9%TESSA: $73k → 9%TESSA: $71k → 9%TESSA: $70k → 9%Tri-Lakes Cares: $62k → 9%Tri-Lakes Cares: $61k → 9%TRI-LAKES CARES: $60k → 9%Tri-Lakes Cares: $58k → 9%Tri-Lakes Cares: $58k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 18 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$3.2M
$95k

Still filing today

89%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentHealthFood & NutritionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TRI-LAKES CARES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $299k · revenue +62%
  • SK
    Special Kids-Special Families Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $293k · revenue +4%
  • SH
    SARAH'S HOME CORPORATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $212k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • EP
    El Paso County EZ Administrator
    one grant, 2022 · $95k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
2
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
3
Hope House of Colorado

Hope house colorado empowers parenting teenage moms to strive for personal and economic self-sufficiency and to understand their significance in god's sight, resulting in a healthy future for them, and for their children.

Human Services
4
Urban Peak Denver

Urban peak helps youth experiencing homelessness and youth at risk of becoming homeless overcome real life challenges by providing essential services and a supportive community, empowering them to become self-sufficient adults.

Housing & Shelter
5
Sunshine Home Share Colorado

Sunshine home share colorado ensures quality of life for older adults and strengthens communities through a safe home-sharing model, supportive economic empowerment, and connections to resources and services.

Housing & Shelter
6
Colorado Homeless Families Inc

CHF assists working families in their quest to go from homelessness to self-sufficiency for life.

Housing & Shelter
7
Tu Casa Incorporated

To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.

8
Fort Collins Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action; habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. fort collins habitat for humanity adheres…

Housing & Shelter
9
Catholic Charities & Community Serv of the Archdiocese of Denver

As the charitable arm of the archdiocese of denver and inspired by god's love and compassion, catholic charities extends the healing ministry of jesus christ to the poor and those in need. catholic charities of the archdiocese of denver…

Human Services
10
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
11
Julia Greeley Home Inc

Julia greeley home, inc. serves single unaccompanied women in the denver metro area between the ages of 18 and 64 who are struggling with chronic or repeated homelessness. the program fulfills existing gaps between overnight short term…

Housing & Shelter
12
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope and Home and the most unlike its peers is Christmas Unlimited Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TESSA — $362,583 · Human ServicesTESSATRI-LAKES CARES — $298,673 · Human ServicesTRI-LAKES CARESHOPE AND HOME — $282,449 · Human ServicesHOPE AND HOMECHRISTMAS UNLIMITED INC — $160,357 · Human ServicesCHRISTMAS UNLIMITED INCThe Place — $131,918 · Human ServicesThe PlaceTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION — $97,284 · Human ServicesTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSIONTHE ARC PIKES PEAK REGION — $177,023 · OtherTHE ARC PIKES PEAK REGI…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL COLORADO INC — $152,948 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF C…The Christian Home For Children Inc — $133,307 · OtherThe Christian Home For …THE SALVATION ARMY — $123,022 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYEl Paso County EZ Administrator — $94,730 · OtherEl Paso County EZ Admin…SARAH'S HOME CORPORATION — $211,656 · Housing & ShelterSARAH'S HOME C…GRECCIO HOUSING UNLIMITED INC — $205,366 · Housing & ShelterGRECCIO HOUSIN…Special Kids-Special Families Inc — $293,454 · HealthSpecial Ki…PATHWAY TO THE ROCKIES COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $124,189 · Youth DevelopmentJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA — $84,797 · Youth DevelopmentCare and Share Inc — $138,154 · Food & NutritionPARENTS CHALLENGE — $137,353 · EducationMT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICE CENTER — $103,550 · Employment
Human Services$1,333,264Other$681,030Housing & Shelter$417,022Health$293,454Youth Development$208,986Food & Nutrition$138,154Education$137,353Employment$103,550

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTESSA — $362,583 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetTRI-LAKES CARES — $298,673 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetSpecial Kids-Special Families Inc — $293,454 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetHOPE AND HOME — $282,449 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSARAH'S HOME CORPORATION — $211,656 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetGRECCIO HOUSING UNLIMITED INC — $205,366 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTHE ARC PIKES PEAK REGION — $177,023 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetCHRISTMAS UNLIMITED INC — $160,357 over 5y, 38% of budgetCare and Share Inc — $138,154 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPARENTS CHALLENGE — $137,353 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetThe Christian Home For Children Inc — $133,307 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetThe Place — $131,918 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPATHWAY TO THE ROCKIES COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $124,189 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetMT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICE CENTER — $103,550 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION — $97,284 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA — $84,797 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TESSA
  • Who funds TRI-LAKES CARES
  • Who funds Special Kids-Special Families Inc
  • Who funds HOPE AND HOME
  • Who funds SARAH'S HOME CORPORATION
  • Who funds GRECCIO HOUSING UNLIMITED INC
  • Who funds THE ARC PIKES PEAK REGION
  • Who funds CHRISTMAS UNLIMITED INC
  • Who funds Care and Share Inc
  • Who funds PARENTS CHALLENGE
  • Who funds The Christian Home For Children Inc
  • Who funds The Place
  • Who funds PATHWAY TO THE ROCKIES COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds MT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICE CENTER
  • Who funds THE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El Pomar FoundationCO29.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El Pomar Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Myron Stratton Home · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · Luther T McCauley Charitable Trust Xxxxx3001 · Pikes Peak United Way · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · The Marson Foundation · The Hester E & Edwin W Giddings Foundation · INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak · Ent Credit Union

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Woodford Manufacturing Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Woodford Manufacturing Charities Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Woodford Manufacturing Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph